Liquid Buccal Mucosa Graft Urethroplasty

NCT ID: NCT03061344

Last Updated: 2017-02-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE1

Total Enrollment

10 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-02-28

Study Completion Date

2021-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Study Objectives The current definitive treatment options for urethral stricture disease include endoscopic urethrotomy known as Direct Vision Internal Urethrotomy (DVIU) or open reconstruction known as urethroplasty (1-6). The purpose of this study is to determine feasibility of endoscopic-only repair of urethral stricture or bladder neck contracture using a combination of existing surgical techniques of internal urethrotomy (or bladder neck incision) augmented by buccal mucosal graft.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background and Rationale There are two definitive treatment options for urethral strictures: DVIU and open urethroplasty. DVIU is an endoscopic procedure considered to be minimally invasive, but also with a high failure rate of 60-92%. The repeated DVIUs are reported to have even higher failure rates. On the other hand, open urethroplasty, considered a gold standard for reconstruction, is invasive, requires incision of the perineum or urethra, leaves a life-long scar, and has long term success rates of 74-95%. The details of DVIU and open urethroplasty are discussed below.

DVIU involves passing a cystoscope into the urethra to the level of stricture and incising the stricture longitudinally to create a wide passage to the level of normal urethra on the proximal side. The hope is to cut through the scar to the level of healthy underlying tissue and in the process of healing to populate the cut surface with healthy urethral epithelium (or at least to stabilize the scar in open configuration). In most cases, the scarring recurs faster than epithelization and most strictures recur after DVIU within 7-8 months. Studies show the strictures after traditional repeat DVIU are longer and require more involved reconstruction than strictures in patients without prior instrumentation.

Open urethroplasty for urethral strictures or bladder neck contractures usually involves longitudinal incision of the urethra (from outside in) and augmentation of the incised part with a strip of harvested Buccal Mucosal Graft (BMG). The goal of the operation is to create a wide urethral lumen for the patient to be able to pass urine without obstruction.

The first step of the procedure for DVIU and open reconstruction are nearly the same: a longitudinal incision of the scarred portion of the urethra. The difference is in the second part: covering the defect with buccal mucosal graft as in open urethroplasty vs leaving the incision uncovered and exposed to passage of urine.

Investigators of this study hereby propose to combine the minimally invasive technique of the DVIU with the technique of augmenting the incised stricture (or bladder neck contracture) using buccal mucosal graft placed endoscopically by means of application of liquid suspended graft. A similar, but more invasive technique was reported by Seith et al in 2012 performed in 12 patients with the exception of need for small open perineal incision for graft fixation. A purely endoscopic skin graft placement into urethra was reported by Naude in 1998 in 53 patients with 95% success rate at 2 years follow up. While he has not made actual incisions, his approach required percutaneous perineal needle placement for graft delivery and a specialized device for graft delivery and graft fixation. The procedure proposed for current trial is purely endoscopic with buccal graft placement and fixation augmented by fibrin glue. This type of fibrin glue sealant is readily available and widely used in General Surgery, Plastic Surgery and in Urology specifically for urethral reconstruction). This will allow for significantly less invasive procedure, shorter procedure time, absence of traditional perineal incision or needle puncture, and earlier return home (same day vs 1-3 days), earlier catheter removal (5-7 days vs 21 days) and earlier return to regular activities (1 week vs 6 weeks).

Overall, the aim is to improve the outcomes of traditional endoscopic procedure while eliminating morbidity of the open reconstruction with added benefits of earlier convalescence and health care savings from decreased surgical morbidity and shortened hospital stay.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Urethral Stricture

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

liquid buccal mucosa graft

DVIU treated with liquid buccal mucosal graft; endoscopic injection of morcellated buccal mucosal graft mixed with fibrin glue

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

DVIU treated with liquid buccal mucosal graft

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

DVIU treated with liquid buccal mucosal graft; internal urethrotomy for urethral stricture followed by injection of morcellated buccal mucosal graft mixed with fibrin glue (Tisseel, Baxter)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

DVIU treated with liquid buccal mucosal graft

DVIU treated with liquid buccal mucosal graft; internal urethrotomy for urethral stricture followed by injection of morcellated buccal mucosal graft mixed with fibrin glue (Tisseel, Baxter)

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male \>18 years of age
* bulbar urethral stricture
* bladder neck contracture

Exclusion Criteria

* \<18 years old
* developmental delay
* incarcerated individuals,
* history of prior urethroplasty
* history of cerebrovascular diseases (prior stroke, MI)
* history of deep vein thrombosis
* history of pulmonary embolism
* history of clotting disorders
* factor 5 Leiden
* antiphospholipid antibody syndrome
* prothrombin gene mutation
* protein S deficiency
* protein C deficiency
* dysfibrinogenemia
* polycythemia vera
* essential thrombocytosis
* untreated malignancy
* hypercoagulable state
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

State University of New York - Upstate Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dmitriy Nikolavsky

Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Dmitriy Nikolavsky, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

State University of New York - Upstate Medical University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

SUNY Upstate Medical University

Syracuse, New York, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Dmitriy Nikolavsky, MD

Role: CONTACT

315-464-1500

Janice Sell

Role: CONTACT

315-464-6114

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SUNYUpstateMU

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Urethral Vascularization and Urodynamics
NCT07185698 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA