Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE1
10 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-02-28
2021-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Dorsal vs. Ventral Buccal Graft Dorsal vs. Ventral Buccal Graft
NCT02551783
A Study of Dorsal Versus Ventral Buccal Mucosa Graft Onlay for Bulbar Urethroplasty
NCT02634619
Small Intestinal Submucosa Graft for Repair of Anterior Urethral Strictures
NCT06192654
Safety and Feasibility Study of Autologous Engineered Urethral Constructs for the Treatment of Strictures
NCT03258658
Treating Stress Urinary Incontinence: Laparoscopic Obturator Urethropexy vs Burch Urethropexy
NCT04133935
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
DVIU involves passing a cystoscope into the urethra to the level of stricture and incising the stricture longitudinally to create a wide passage to the level of normal urethra on the proximal side. The hope is to cut through the scar to the level of healthy underlying tissue and in the process of healing to populate the cut surface with healthy urethral epithelium (or at least to stabilize the scar in open configuration). In most cases, the scarring recurs faster than epithelization and most strictures recur after DVIU within 7-8 months. Studies show the strictures after traditional repeat DVIU are longer and require more involved reconstruction than strictures in patients without prior instrumentation.
Open urethroplasty for urethral strictures or bladder neck contractures usually involves longitudinal incision of the urethra (from outside in) and augmentation of the incised part with a strip of harvested Buccal Mucosal Graft (BMG). The goal of the operation is to create a wide urethral lumen for the patient to be able to pass urine without obstruction.
The first step of the procedure for DVIU and open reconstruction are nearly the same: a longitudinal incision of the scarred portion of the urethra. The difference is in the second part: covering the defect with buccal mucosal graft as in open urethroplasty vs leaving the incision uncovered and exposed to passage of urine.
Investigators of this study hereby propose to combine the minimally invasive technique of the DVIU with the technique of augmenting the incised stricture (or bladder neck contracture) using buccal mucosal graft placed endoscopically by means of application of liquid suspended graft. A similar, but more invasive technique was reported by Seith et al in 2012 performed in 12 patients with the exception of need for small open perineal incision for graft fixation. A purely endoscopic skin graft placement into urethra was reported by Naude in 1998 in 53 patients with 95% success rate at 2 years follow up. While he has not made actual incisions, his approach required percutaneous perineal needle placement for graft delivery and a specialized device for graft delivery and graft fixation. The procedure proposed for current trial is purely endoscopic with buccal graft placement and fixation augmented by fibrin glue. This type of fibrin glue sealant is readily available and widely used in General Surgery, Plastic Surgery and in Urology specifically for urethral reconstruction). This will allow for significantly less invasive procedure, shorter procedure time, absence of traditional perineal incision or needle puncture, and earlier return home (same day vs 1-3 days), earlier catheter removal (5-7 days vs 21 days) and earlier return to regular activities (1 week vs 6 weeks).
Overall, the aim is to improve the outcomes of traditional endoscopic procedure while eliminating morbidity of the open reconstruction with added benefits of earlier convalescence and health care savings from decreased surgical morbidity and shortened hospital stay.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
liquid buccal mucosa graft
DVIU treated with liquid buccal mucosal graft; endoscopic injection of morcellated buccal mucosal graft mixed with fibrin glue
DVIU treated with liquid buccal mucosal graft
DVIU treated with liquid buccal mucosal graft; internal urethrotomy for urethral stricture followed by injection of morcellated buccal mucosal graft mixed with fibrin glue (Tisseel, Baxter)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
DVIU treated with liquid buccal mucosal graft
DVIU treated with liquid buccal mucosal graft; internal urethrotomy for urethral stricture followed by injection of morcellated buccal mucosal graft mixed with fibrin glue (Tisseel, Baxter)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* bulbar urethral stricture
* bladder neck contracture
Exclusion Criteria
* developmental delay
* incarcerated individuals,
* history of prior urethroplasty
* history of cerebrovascular diseases (prior stroke, MI)
* history of deep vein thrombosis
* history of pulmonary embolism
* history of clotting disorders
* factor 5 Leiden
* antiphospholipid antibody syndrome
* prothrombin gene mutation
* protein S deficiency
* protein C deficiency
* dysfibrinogenemia
* polycythemia vera
* essential thrombocytosis
* untreated malignancy
* hypercoagulable state
18 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
State University of New York - Upstate Medical University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dmitriy Nikolavsky
Assistant Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Dmitriy Nikolavsky, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
State University of New York - Upstate Medical University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
SUNY Upstate Medical University
Syracuse, New York, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SUNYUpstateMU
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.