Pilot Feasibility Study of a Cognitive Behavioral Coping Skills (CBCS) Group Intervention for Hep C Therapy Patients

NCT ID: NCT03057236

Last Updated: 2017-02-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-03-01

Study Completion Date

2014-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a pilot feasibility study of a small randomized controlled trial (RCT)design to evaluate participation in a Cognitive Behavioral Coping Skills (CBCS) group intervention versus standard of care in patients with hepatitis C undergoing antiviral treatment. The primary objectives are to (1) examine effect size (ES) estimates of key outcomes to provide essential data to inform a larger efficacy trial, (2) determine whether clinically significant improvements occurred in any key outcomes, and (3) evaluate study feasibility and patient acceptability. Study findings will inform a larger efficacy study of the CBCS-HCV.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a pilot feasibility study of a Cognitive Behavioral Coping Skills (CBCS) Group Intervention with a representative sample of patients with Hepatitis C viral (HCV)undergoing standard antiviral treatment in a small RCT to examine (1) study feasibility, (2) effect size estimates, and (3) whether clinically significant improvements occurred in key outcomes. This pilot study will allow the investigators to test the hypotheses that the study procedures are feasible and that participation in the CBCS-HCV group is acceptable and useful to participants. Furthermore, effect size estimates of key outcome variables will determine which outcomes appear to improve as a result of the intervention and should potentially be evaluated in a future efficacy study. Several patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are evaluated: health-related quality of life (HrQOL), perceived stress, depression, anxiety, anger, fatigue, sleep, pain and medication adherence. The investigators will also determine if group participation affects viral cure rate. Change scores that have an effect size d\> .35 are considered potentially clinically significant and reasonable to evaluate in a larger efficacy study. Study feasibility elements evaluated included: feasibility of a RCT study design, intervention delivery, patient acceptability, therapist protocol fidelity, recruitment, enrollment, attendance, retention and data collection.

The investigators planned to enroll and evaluate the intervention in two waves of study participants (Wave 2, Wave 3). When a block of 12 patients is consented for Wave 2, participants will be randomized to standard of care (SC; n=6) or the CBCS-HCV group intervention (n=6). The same procedure will be used to consent and randomize 12 patients in Wave 3 to SC vs CBCS-HCV. Patients randomized to CBCS will participate in 4 weekly CBCS sessions prior to starting HCV treatment, and 5 more sessions during HCV treatment, on the same day they attend follow-up treatment visits at weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12. Outcome data will be collected at baseline (T1), just prior to HCV treatment starting (T2); at week 8 of HCV treatment (T3), at end of CBCS intervention/ HCV treatment at week 12 (T4), and 1-month post-CBCS intervention/ HCV treatment (T5). The primary outcome is change in total HrQOL score. Secondary outcomes are change in other PROs noted above. Additional secondary outcomes are group differences in medication adherence and viral cure rate. Elements of study feasibility are also evaluated.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hepatitis C Hepatitis C, Chronic

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Participants are assigned to Standard of Care group or the Intervention (CBCS) group.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Standard of Care

This arm does not receive the behavioral intervention. Participants will complete HCV treatment per standard of care.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Cognitive Behavior Coping Skills

The CBCS intervention is a structured module-based group intervention involving 9, 2-hour sessions. Participants will participate in 4 weekly sessions before HCV treatment to learn and practice new cognitive behavioral skills, and 5 sessions during HCV treatment at weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Cognitive Behavior Coping Skills

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The CBCS-HCV is a psychosocial intervention delivered in group format. Through 9 group sessions, patients will learn coping skills, relaxation techniques and other new cognitive and behavioral skills based on several empirically-supported cognitive behavioral interventions.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Cognitive Behavior Coping Skills

The CBCS-HCV is a psychosocial intervention delivered in group format. Through 9 group sessions, patients will learn coping skills, relaxation techniques and other new cognitive and behavioral skills based on several empirically-supported cognitive behavioral interventions.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

CBCS-HCV

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All English -speaking adult patients (age 21 or older) with HCV;
* Treatment-naïve or treatment experienced;
* Deemed eligible for standard antiviral therapy for HCV by the clinical providers by standard clinical criteria;
* Referred by HCV clinician or on "Treatment Waitlist" ready to start a 12-week prescribed course of antiviral therapy.

Exclusion Criteria

* Prescribed a 24-week antiviral treatment regimen;
* Inability to provide written informed consent;
* Currently participating in another pharmaceutical clinical trial of hepatitis C therapeutics;
* Evidence of use of illicit substances (excluding marijuana) reported in the last 6 months by patient during screening or noted in patient's medical record
* Current significant suicidal ideation reported during Screening or noted in patient's medical record
* Current significant personality disorder or features reported during Screening or noted in patient's medical record that is clinically judged to be detrimental to the group therapeutic setting for other group participants
* Cannot make personal commitment to attend study visits and/or intervention sessions
* Is medically or psychiatrically contraindicated to proceed with HCV antiviral therapy at the time of study enrollment.
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Donna Evon, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of North Carolina

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Evon DM, Golin CE, Ruffin R, Ayres S, Fried MW. Novel patient-reported outcomes (PROs) used in a pilot and feasibility study of a Cognitive Behavioral Coping Skills (CBCS) group intervention for patients with chronic hepatitis C. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2018 Jun 27;4:92. doi: 10.1186/s40814-018-0285-5. eCollection 2018.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29983993 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

K23DK089004

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

K24DK066144

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

12-2323

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

HCV-Smoking Cessation Study
NCT05466981 COMPLETED NA