The Comparison of Postoperative Pain After Lumbar Fusion Surgery in Intravenous Patient-controlled Analgesia Between Conventional Mode and Optimizing B.I Mode With 'PAINSTOP' Equipment
NCT ID: NCT03047044
Last Updated: 2019-02-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
58 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-07-01
2019-01-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Multimodal Analgesia vs. Routine Care Pain Management for Lumbar Spine Fusion Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Study
NCT02202369
Oral Versus Intravenous Acetaminophen in Lumbar Spine Surgery
NCT07203079
The Analgesic Effect of Nefopam on the Fentanyl Based PCA (Patient-controlled Analgesia) After Lumbar Spinal Surgery
NCT01808014
Assessing Efficacy of Intravenous Acetaminophen for Perioperative Pain Treatment in Spinal Surgery
NCT05764707
Comparison of Patient-Controlled Analgesia With Different Background Infusion
NCT03221491
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Conventional PCA mode
(Mode setting; total volume: 140 ml, flow rate: 2 ml, bolus volume: 0.5 ml, and LOT: 15 minutes)
Conventional PCA mode
Mode setting; total volume: 150 ml, flow rate: 2 ml, bolus volume: 0.5 ml, and LOT: 10 minutes
Optimizing B.I (New) PCA mode
(Mode setting; total volume: 140 ml, flow rate: changable by patients' requirement, bolus volume: 0.5 ml, and LOT: 15 minutes)
Optimizing basal infusion (B.I)
In the intervention group, the optimizing B.I PCA mode will be setted. This mode is setted that the amount of administered drug per hour will be increased by 0.3 ml by pressing bolus button (The interval: \~ 8 hr: 2 - 4 ml, 8-24 hr: 1 - 3 ml, 24 hours \~ : 0.5 - 2.5 ml). Conversely, if the bolus button is not used for 90 minutes, the administered amount of drug per hour is setted to be reduced by 0.1 ml, and the maximum (or minimum) allowable flow rate is 4 ml (or 0.5 ml).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Optimizing basal infusion (B.I)
In the intervention group, the optimizing B.I PCA mode will be setted. This mode is setted that the amount of administered drug per hour will be increased by 0.3 ml by pressing bolus button (The interval: \~ 8 hr: 2 - 4 ml, 8-24 hr: 1 - 3 ml, 24 hours \~ : 0.5 - 2.5 ml). Conversely, if the bolus button is not used for 90 minutes, the administered amount of drug per hour is setted to be reduced by 0.1 ml, and the maximum (or minimum) allowable flow rate is 4 ml (or 0.5 ml).
Conventional PCA mode
Mode setting; total volume: 150 ml, flow rate: 2 ml, bolus volume: 0.5 ml, and LOT: 10 minutes
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. ASA class Ⅰ-Ⅲ
3. Written consents obtained to participate voluntarily in this clinical trial
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patients who have the hypersensitivity to the pain killers including narcotics
3. Patients who are unable to express the degree of pain
20 Years
70 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Yonsei University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Anesthesia and Pain Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine
Seoul, , South Korea
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
4-2016-1079
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.