The Effectiveness of IV/PO Acetaminophen in the Perioperative Period in Reducing Opiate Use After Lumbar Spine Fusion

NCT ID: NCT03104816

Last Updated: 2019-10-08

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

28 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-10-31

Study Completion Date

2017-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Simple explanation and rationale:

Recovery after spine surgery is usually accompanied by severe pain which has traditionally been managed with opioids. It is common practice to supplement opioid treatment with different classes of analgesics which work through alternative pain pathways and receptors in order to achieve an additive or synergistic effect while reducing the amount of opioids necessary for pain control.

Acetaminophen can be a beneficial supplemental analgesic to opioids for postoperative pain relief.

Intervention:

Patients will be randomized to either the treatment with IV acetaminophen (A), PO acetaminophen (B), or hydromorphone control group (C).

Objective/Purpose:

Primary objective is to determine the impact of administering a supplemental non-opioid analgesic drug such as IV or PO acetaminophen on total opioid dose administered over the postoperative period.

Secondary objectives include investigating the impact of IV/PO acetaminophen on the level of postoperative pain, patient satisfaction, and side effects secondary to opioids such as nausea, vomiting, pruritus, sedation, respiratory depression, ileus, and urinary retention, and PACU (postoperative care unit) discharge time.

Study population:

126 patients will be enrolled in the study (42 for group A, 42 for group B, and 42 for control group C).

Follow-up and Endpoints / Outcomes:

Postoperative assessments will be done at 0, 30, and 60 minutes, 6 hours, 12 hours and 24 hours after surgery. Patients will be evaluated for pain (using a numeric rating scale), total opioid consumption, and for opioid side effects including drowsiness (using the Ramsey sedation scale and the Aldrete score at the time of arrival to and discharge from recovery room), respiratory depression, nausea, vomiting, and pruritus. Patient satisfaction will also be assessed using a numeric rating scale.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Simple explanation and rationale:

Recovery after spine surgery, especially spinal fusion surgery, is usually accompanied by severe pain which has traditionally been managed with opioids. While opioids have been proven effective, they are associated with undesirable side effects including nausea, vomiting, pruritus, sedation, respiratory depression, ileus, and urinary retention leading to increased time required in recovery and a decrease in patient satisfaction. For this reason, it is common practice to supplement opioid treatment with different classes of analgesics which work through alternative pain pathways and receptors in order to achieve an additive or synergistic effect while reducing the amount of opioids necessary for pain control.

Acetaminophen is a centrally-acting cyclooxygenase inhibitor nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medication that has minimal, if any, gastrointestinal and platelet-inhibiting side effects, and is better tolerated by patients than other cyclooxygenase inhibitors. This medication can be a beneficial supplemental analgesic to opioids for postoperative pain relief. Previously conducted studies demonstrate a rationale for the use of intravenous/PO acetaminophen in a multimodal analgesic regimen to reduce postoperative analgesia.

Intervention:

Patients will be randomized to either the treatment with IV acetaminophen (A), PO acetaminophen (B), or hydromorphone control group (C). Patients who are randomized to group A will receive 1 g of IV acetaminophen during the wound closure and every 4 to 6 hours postoperatively for a total of 4 g in 24 hours. Patients who are randomized to group B will receive 1 g of PO acetaminophen before surgery and every 4 to 6 hours postoperatively for a total of 4 g in 24 hours. Patients who are randomized to control group C will not receive acetaminophen. Post-operatively, patients in both groups will also receive IV hydromorphone PCA (patient-controlled analgesia) only for 24 hours for pain.

Objective/Purpose:

Primary objective is to determine the impact of administering a supplemental non-opioid analgesic drug such as IV or PO acetaminophen on total opioid dose administered over the postoperative period.

Secondary objectives include investigating the impact of IV/PO acetaminophen on the level of postoperative pain, patient satisfaction, and side effects secondary to opioids such as nausea, vomiting, pruritus, sedation, respiratory depression, ileus, and urinary retention, and PACU discharge time.

Study population:

126 patients will be enrolled in the study (42 for group A, 42 for group B, and 42 for control group C).

Follow-up and Endpoints / Outcomes:

Postoperative assessments will be done at 0, 30, and 60 minutes, 6 hours, 12 hours and 24 hours after surgery. Patients will be evaluated for pain (using a numeric rating scale), total opioid consumption, and for opioid side effects including drowsiness (using the Ramsey sedation scale and the Aldrete score at the time of arrival to and discharge from recovery room), respiratory depression, nausea, vomiting, and pruritus. Patient satisfaction will also be assessed using a numeric rating scale.

Statistics:

All sample size calculations with reference to:

* Specific Aim 1 reduction of opioid intake by at least 25% between the Control (Group C) and Intervention Groups A and B, and
* Specific Aim 2 improvement of Pain Score by at least 25% between the Control (Group C) and the Intervention Groups A and B,

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Fusion of Spine, Lumbar Region

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Acetaminophen IV Soln 10 MG/ML (A)

Patients in group A will receive 1 g of IV acetaminophen 15 minutes prior to wound incision, and every 4 to 6 hours postoperatively for a total of 4 grams in 24 hours.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Acetaminophen IV Soln 10 MG/ML

Intervention Type DRUG

Hydromorphone

Intervention Type DRUG

PO acetaminophen (B)

Patients in group B will receive 1 g of PO acetaminophen prior to surgery, and 1 g of oral acetaminophen every 4 to 6 hours postoperatively for a total of 4 grams in 24 hours.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Acetaminophen

Intervention Type DRUG

Hydromorphone

Intervention Type DRUG

Hydromorphone (control arm) (C)

Patients in the control arm (Group C) will not receive acetaminophen for 24 hours.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Hydromorphone

Intervention Type DRUG

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Acetaminophen IV Soln 10 MG/ML

Intervention Type DRUG

Acetaminophen

Intervention Type DRUG

Hydromorphone

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Ofirmev Tylenol Dilaudid

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) I-III patients scheduled for elective one or two level minimally invasive lumbar fusions

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients requiring surgery for neoplastic processes
* Allergy to acetaminophen
* Liver dysfunction and elevated Liver Function Tests (LFTs)
* Alcohol or drug dependency
* Mental retardation
* Less than 50 kg of weight
* regnant women
* Patients requiring long-acting opioid pain management (including fentanyl patch, oxycontin, etc) for over 3 weeks immediately prior to surgery
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Southern California

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Eugenia Ayrian

Associate Professor of Clinical Anesthesiology;Chief of Neuro Anesthesiology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Eugenia Ayrian

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Southern California

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Keck Hospital of USC

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Cakan T, Inan N, Culhaoglu S, Bakkal K, Basar H. Intravenous paracetamol improves the quality of postoperative analgesia but does not decrease narcotic requirements. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2008 Jul;20(3):169-73. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0b013e3181705cfb.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18580346 (View on PubMed)

Devin CJ, McGirt MJ. Best evidence in multimodal pain management in spine surgery and means of assessing postoperative pain and functional outcomes. J Clin Neurosci. 2015 Jun;22(6):930-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2015.01.003. Epub 2015 Mar 9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25766366 (View on PubMed)

Korkmaz Dilmen O, Tunali Y, Cakmakkaya OS, Yentur E, Tutuncu AC, Tureci E, Bahar M. Efficacy of intravenous paracetamol, metamizol and lornoxicam on postoperative pain and morphine consumption after lumbar disc surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010 May;27(5):428-32. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32833731a4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20173643 (View on PubMed)

Garcia RM, Cassinelli EH, Messerschmitt PJ, Furey CG, Bohlman HH. A multimodal approach for postoperative pain management after lumbar decompression surgery: a prospective, randomized study. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2013 Aug;26(6):291-7. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318246b0a6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23887076 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HS-15-00615

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

IV vs Oral Acetaminophen in Spine Fusion Perioperative Care
NCT03020875 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION PHASE4
Methadone for Spinal Fusion Surgery.
NCT04764825 TERMINATED PHASE4
Opioid Tapering After Spine Surgery
NCT04140955 COMPLETED NA