Electric-Acoustic Stimulation Extended Follow-up Post Approval Study
NCT ID: NCT03031678
Last Updated: 2020-09-10
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-12-31
2019-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Safety and Effectiveness of the MED-EL Electric-Acoustic System
NCT00747435
Combined Electric and Acoustic Hearing (EAS) in Children and Adults
NCT05923203
Place-based Mapping in EAS Listeners
NCT04722042
Outcomes in Children With Pre-operative Residual Hearing
NCT03379870
Implantation of the HiRes90K™ Advantage Cochlear Implant With HiFocus™ Mid-Scala and Development of a Combined Electric and Acoustic Stimulation Technology in Adults With Partial Deafness
NCT02189798
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Study procedures
Electric-Acoustic Stimulation (EAS) Cochlear Implant System
Combination of a cochlear implant and a hearing aid
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Electric-Acoustic Stimulation (EAS) Cochlear Implant System
Combination of a cochlear implant and a hearing aid
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss for frequencies greater than 1500 Hz (i.e., threshold no better than 70 dB HL at 2000-8000 Hz)
* Low-frequency thresholds up to and including 500 Hz no poorer than 65 dB HL
* CNC word recognition score less than or equal to 60% in the ear to be implanted
* CNC word recognition score less than or equal to 60% in the contralateral ear
* English spoken as the primary language
Exclusion Criteria
* Hearing loss in the ear to be implanted that has demonstrated a recent fluctuation at two or more frequencies of 15 dB in either direction in the last 2 years
* Any physical, psychological, or emotional disorder that interferes with surgery or the ability to perform on test and rehabilitation procedures
* Developmental delays or organic brain dysfunction
* Unrealistic expectations on the part of the subject, regarding the possible benefits, risks, and limitations
* Unwillingness or inability of the candidate to comply with all investigational requirements
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Med-El Corporation
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Stanford Unversity
Palo Alto, California, United States
University of Miami
Miami, Florida, United States
University of Kansas University Medical Center
Kansas City, Kansas, United States
University of North Carolina
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
The Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, United States
Medical College of Wisconsin
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Skarzynski H, van de Heyning P, Agrawal S, Arauz SL, Atlas M, Baumgartner W, Caversaccio M, de Bodt M, Gavilan J, Godey B, Green K, Gstoettner W, Hagen R, Han DM, Kameswaran M, Karltorp E, Kompis M, Kuzovkov V, Lassaletta L, Levevre F, Li Y, Manikoth M, Martin J, Mlynski R, Mueller J, O'Driscoll M, Parnes L, Prentiss S, Pulibalathingal S, Raine CH, Rajan G, Rajeswaran R, Rivas JA, Rivas A, Skarzynski PH, Sprinzl G, Staecker H, Stephan K, Usami S, Yanov Y, Zernotti ME, Zimmermann K, Lorens A, Mertens G. Towards a consensus on a hearing preservation classification system. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 2013;(564):3-13. doi: 10.3109/00016489.2013.869059.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
P000025/PAS001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.