A Study of MOXR0916 in Combination With Atezolizumab Versus Atezolizumab Alone in Participants With Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Who Are Ineligible for Cisplatin-Based Therapy

NCT ID: NCT03029832

Last Updated: 2019-05-31

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

5 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-04-27

Study Completion Date

2018-04-25

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a Phase II, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of MOXR0916 in combination with atezolizumab versus placebo and atezolizumab in participants with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC) who have not received prior systemic therapy in the locally advanced/metastatic setting and who are ineligible to receive cisplatin-based therapy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The study design has been amended after the decision to prematurely stop patient accrual due to enrollment challenges. As only 5 participants were enrolled, the study blinding will not be maintained, and placebo infusions will not be administered. Patients assigned to the MOXR0916 arm may continue study treatment with the combination of atezolizumab and MOXR0916 or with atezolizumab alone based on a discussion of benefit and risk with the treating investigator.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Urothelial Carcinoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

The study design has been amended in that the study blinding will not be maintained.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

MOXR0916 plus Atezolizumab

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

MOXR0916

Intervention Type DRUG

MOXR0916, 300 milligram (mg) by intravenous (IV) infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle.

Atezolizumab

Intervention Type DRUG

Atezolizumab, 1200 mg by intravenous (IV) infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle.

Atezolizumab

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Atezolizumab

Intervention Type DRUG

Atezolizumab, 1200 mg by intravenous (IV) infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

MOXR0916

MOXR0916, 300 milligram (mg) by intravenous (IV) infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle.

Intervention Type DRUG

Atezolizumab

Atezolizumab, 1200 mg by intravenous (IV) infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age \>= 18 years
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of \<= 2
* Life expectancy \>= 12 weeks
* Histologically or cytologically confirmed locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC)
* Availability of a representative formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor specimen
* No prior systemic therapy for inoperable locally advanced or metastatic UC
* Ineligible for cisplatin-based chemotherapy as defined by any one of the following criteria: Impaired renal function (glomerular filtration rate \[GFR\] \> 30 but \< 60 milliliter/minute \[mL/min\]); National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) version (v) 4.0 Grade \>= 2 audiometric hearing loss (of 25 Decibel at two contiguous frequencies or more severe); NCI CTCAE v 4.0 Grade \>= 2 peripheral neuropathy; ECOG Performance Status of 2
* Measurable disease according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1
* Adequate hematologic and end-organ function

Exclusion Criteria

* Significant cardiovascular disease
* Known clinically significant liver disease
* Any approved anti-cancer therapy, including chemotherapy or hormonal therapy, within 3 weeks prior to initiation of study treatment
* Prior treatment with CD137 or OX40 agonists, anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein (CTLA4), anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1), anti- programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), anti-CD-27, anti- glucocorticoid-induced tumor necrosis factor receptor (GITR) therapeutic antibody or pathway-targeting agents
* Untreated central nervous system (CNS) metastases or active (progressing or requiring corticosteroids for symptomatic control) CNS metastases
* Any history of leptomeningeal disease
* Malignancies other than UC within 5 years prior to Cycle 1, Day 1
* History of autoimmune disease
* History of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, pneumonitis, organizing pneumonia, or evidence of active pneumonitis on screening chest computed tomography scan
* Active hepatitis B and C virus infection
* Positive HIV test at screening
* Active tuberculosis
* Prior allogeneic stem cell or solid organ transplantation
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Genentech, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Clinical Trials

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Hoffmann-La Roche

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Arizona Oncology - HOPE Wilmot

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

University of Colorado

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Yale University

New Haven, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Miami Cancer Institute of Baptist Health, Inc.

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

University of Chicago; Hematology/Oncology

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Kansas City - Menorah Medical Center

Kansas City, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Maryland Oncology Hematology, P.A.

Columbia, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Nebraska Methodist Hospital; Cancer Center

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

New York Oncology Hematology, P.C.

Albany, New York, United States

Site Status

Columbia University Medical Center; Clinical Research Management Office

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Onc/Hem Care Clin Trials LLC

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

SCRI Tennessee Oncology Chattanooga

Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Sarah Cannon Research Inst.

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Texas Oncology-Baylor Sammons Cancer Center

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Virginia Oncology Associates - Lake Wright Cancer Center

Norfolk, Virginia, United States

Site Status

GasthuisZusters Antwerpen

Wilrijk, , Belgium

Site Status

Princess Margaret Cancer Center

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Seoul National University Hospital

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Asan Medical Center - Oncology

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Leicester Royal Infirmary NHS Trust

Leicester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Barts and the London NHS Trust.

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Belgium Canada South Korea United Kingdom

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2016-004165-58

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

GO39590

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.