Water Drinking Test and Its Reproducibility in Goldmann Applanation Tonometry and Pneumatic Tonometry

NCT ID: NCT03014349

Last Updated: 2017-01-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-01-31

Study Completion Date

2016-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the reproducibility of tonometry in the Goldmann applanation apparatus and pneumatic in the water drinking test.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Glaucoma consists of a multifactorial disease caused by a deficiency in drainage of the aqueous humor, which may cause an increase in intraocular pressure (IOP), an impairment of the optic nerve and visual field changes. According to the most recent data , this disease is the second cause of blindness in the world (12.3%). An estimate indicates that, by 2020, there will be 79.6 million glaucomatous individuals in the world. The estimated prevalence of primary glaucoma in the Brazilian population was 3.4%, consisting of 2.4% open angle and 0.7% closed angle.

Glaucoma can be: open angle, angle-closure, congenital or secondary. Increased IOP is the major risk factor for glaucoma progression as well as its fluctuation (difference between the highest and lowest IOP measure) in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). In addition, age, family history, central corneal thickness, race, high myopia, hypermetropia, diabetes mellitus, hypertension and hypotension, gender, optic disc hemorrhages, suspected optic nerve excavation, and cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases.

The treatment depends on the classification of glaucoma, since in the POAG, the initial treatment is with topical monotherapy (ocular hypotensors). However, in some situations, drug treatment is not enough to stabilize the process of glaucomatous progression. In these cases, incisional surgery or laser treatment is necessary.

Trabeculectomy consists of an intervention to increase drainage of the aqueous humor, in order to control the IOP and prevent the progression of the disease. However, due to its complications, such as atalamia, hypotonia, the development of cataract and the risk of endophthalmitis, this procedure is indicated in the refractory cases to clinical and/or laser treatment. Thus, clinical treatment and trabeculoplasty are the treatments of choice. Trabeculoplasty is indicated in the cases of POAG, pseudoexfoliative, pigmented and in some cases of secondary and trabecular glaucoma visible to the gonioscopy.

The tonometer is the device used to detect IOP increase. Despite the existence of several models, Goldmann's applanation is considered the gold standard for this measurement, since it evaluates the force necessary to deform the surface of the cornea. This method is quite accurate, however, errors may occur in the result due to fluorescein patterns, very thick corneas, excessive pressure on the eyeball when holding the patient's eyelids or elevated corneal astigmatism without the adequate compensatory positioning of the planer.

The measurement of IOP can also be performed through another type of tonometer: non-contact, pneumatic or blow. It was first used in 1973 by Forbes and its advantages are: 1) no need for the use of eye drops, 2) it can be performed by people who are not doctors, 3) it has a low risk of contamination and 4) it can be used for screening programs. However, a study by Britt et al. showed the presence of lachrymal film dehiscence and the existence of microaerosol with the air blow, which would make this method not so aseptic.

According to the study, where the pneumatic tonometer was compared with that of Goldmann, the results obtained were: 50% of the evaluated eyes showed no differences between the two devices and in 85% they were between approximately 2 mmHg. In another study which compared the IOP values measured by the mentioned tonometers, it was verified that the pneumatic tonometer underestimates the IOP values, compared to Goldmann, in thin corneas; however, there is no significant difference between the measurements of the two tonometers in thick corneas.

The Water Drinking Test (WDT) is a propaedeutic widely used to evaluate the maximum intraocular pressure (IOP) and its fluctuation. These data are extremely important for the expected result in relation to the reproducibility of the exams, since in the study , showed that the WDT can be used to estimate the peak and diurnal fluctuation of supine IOP in the simplified daily stress curve (another method for the same purpose of the WDT) in patients under treatment for glaucoma.

Glaucoma is a serious eye health problem, as it has a high incidence and prevalence worldwide and is the leading cause of irreversible blindness in the world. Therefore, it is extremely important to perform tests that will detect altered IOP values.

The IOP values obtained over a 24 hour period are important data, since they are required to control and conduct the treatment of glaucoma. In the past, the WDT has often been used to diagnose patients with this pathology. Due to a series of studies,it was found that the WDT can not be used as a diagnostic test, but as a tool to evaluate changes in IOP peaks. In addition, a comparison of reproducibility between devices will facilitate a better evaluation, speed, safety and efficacy in the treatment, contributing to increase the quality of life of the patient and also to guide other studies in this area.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Glaucoma Suspect

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

primary open-angle glaucoma and/or glaucoma suspects

Individuals with primary open-angle glaucoma and/or glaucoma suspects, selected from the electronic records of the VER Hospital. The following variables will be observed: gender, age, race, systemic diseases, intraocular pressure, type of glaucoma, complementary exams and degree of evolution. All patients were given a complete ophthalmologic examination, including Goldmann and pneumatic tonometry.

Analysis of medical records

Intervention Type OTHER

Individuals with primary open-angle glaucoma and/or glaucoma suspects, selected from the electronic records of the VER Hospital. The following variables will be observed: gender, age, race, systemic diseases, intraocular pressure, type of glaucoma, complementary exams and degree of evolution. All patients were given a complete ophthalmologic examination, including Goldmann and pneumatic tonometry.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Analysis of medical records

Individuals with primary open-angle glaucoma and/or glaucoma suspects, selected from the electronic records of the VER Hospital. The following variables will be observed: gender, age, race, systemic diseases, intraocular pressure, type of glaucoma, complementary exams and degree of evolution. All patients were given a complete ophthalmologic examination, including Goldmann and pneumatic tonometry.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Older than 18 years
* Intraocular pressure greater than 21 mmhg
* Optic neuropathy more than 0.5
* CampimetryPerimetric suggestive of glaucoma

Exclusion Criteria

* Were patients under 18 years of age
* Incomplete data in electronic records
* Had previous ophthalmologic surgeries or other non-glaucoma-related ophthalmic diseases.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

VER Excelência em Oftalmologia

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Rodrigo Egidio da Silva

ophthalmologist

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Wachtl J, Toteberg-Harms M, Frimmel S, Kniestedt C. [Evaluation of correction formulas for tonometry : The Goldmann applanation tonometry in approximation to dynamic contour tonometry]. Ophthalmologe. 2017 Aug;114(8):716-721. doi: 10.1007/s00347-016-0409-3. German.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27921133 (View on PubMed)

Sakata R, Aihara M, Murata H, Saito H, Iwase A, Yasuda N, Araie M. Intraocular pressure change over a habitual 24-hour period after changing posture or drinking water and related factors in normal tension glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Aug 7;54(8):5313-20. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-11792.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23821194 (View on PubMed)

Medina FM, Rodrigues FK, Filho Pde T, Matsuo T, Vasconcellos JP, Costa VP. Reproducibility of water drinking test performed at different times of the day. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2009 May-Jun;72(3):283-90. doi: 10.1590/s0004-27492009000300002.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19668954 (View on PubMed)

Meirelles SH, Yamane R, Alvares RM, Botelho PB, Morais FB, Moreira PB, Dantas AM, de Moraes Junior HV. [Comparative study between diurnal intraocular pressure curve and the association of ambulatory intraocular pressure curve with the water-drinking test in open angle glaucoma, normal tension glaucoma and normal eyes]. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2007 May-Jun;70(3):471-9. doi: 10.1590/s0004-27492007000300015. Portuguese.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17768555 (View on PubMed)

Medeiros FA, Sample PA, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, Aihara M, Weinreb RN. Corneal thickness as a risk factor for visual field loss in patients with preperimetric glaucomatous optic neuropathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003 Nov;136(5):805-13. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(03)00484-7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14597030 (View on PubMed)

Caiado RR, Badaro E, Kasahara N. Intraocular pressure fluctuation in healthy and glaucomatous eyes: a comparative analysis between diurnal curves in supine and sitting positions and the water drinking test. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2014 Oct;77(5):288-292. doi: 10.5935/0004-2749.20140073. Epub 2014 Sep 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25494373 (View on PubMed)

Regev G, Harris A, Siesky B, Shoshani Y, Egan P, Moss A, Zalish M, WuDunn D, Ehrlich R. Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry are not correlated with central corneal thickness in primary open angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2011 Jun-Jul;20(5):282-6. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181e66498.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20577097 (View on PubMed)

Guler M, Bilak S, Bilgin B, Simsek A, Capkin M, Hakim Reyhan A. Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements Obtained by Icare PRO Rebound Tonometer, Tomey FT-1000 Noncontact Tonometer, and Goldmann Applanation Tonometer in Healthy Subjects. J Glaucoma. 2015 Oct-Nov;24(8):613-8. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000132.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25264986 (View on PubMed)

Quaranta L, Konstas AG, Rossetti L, Garcia-Feijoo J, O'Brien C, Nasr MB, Fogagnolo P, Demos CM, Stewart JA, Stewart WC. Untreated 24-h intraocular pressures measured with Goldmann applanation tonometry vs nighttime supine pressures with Perkins applanation tonometry. Eye (Lond). 2010 Jul;24(7):1252-8. doi: 10.1038/eye.2009.300. Epub 2009 Dec 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19960033 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

VEREO

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Outflow Facility AIT vs Microshunt
NCT05548959 COMPLETED NA