Precision of the Icare200 for Measuring Intraocular Pressure

NCT ID: NCT05147610

Last Updated: 2022-07-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

171 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-12-01

Study Completion Date

2022-07-21

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In adult patients, intraocular pression readings are often taken with an air puff tonometer or goldmann tonometer. The current gold standard for IOP measurement is the Goldmann Applanation Tonometry (GAT). In some patients, measurement of intraocular pressure taken by applanation or by air puff may prove to be impossible for various reasons (obesity, handicap, mental disorder, blindness for Air Puff Tonometry, Anxiety, etc).

There are also many other devices that can be used to measure IOP, including those using rebound tonometry like the Icare 200.

The rebound tonometer would systematize IOP screening because of its ease of use, provided its measurements are reliable. In this prospective study, investigators will be measuring participant's IOP with Goldmann Applanation Tonometry, Icare 200 Tonometer and Air Puff Tonometry to see if there is an agreement in IOP between the different devices. Investigators will also look if there is a concordance between central corneal thickness and IOP. Moreover, investigators will look if there is a IOP concordance between the 3 different devices for hight BMI people. Indeed, higher body mass index tend to have difficulties with proper positioning at the slit lamp that may lead to inaccurate GAT measurements. Additionally, stress level of the patients with different tonometry devices will be recorded using a visual analog scale.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Goldmann applanation tonometry remains the gold standard for intraocular pressure measurement in 2021. It provides the most exact approximation of true intraocular pressure based on Imbert Fick's law. The statistical normal (Gaussian distribution) of IOP is 15.8 plus or minus 5.14mmHg (2 standard deviations). Thus, an IOP value is considered to be pathological if it is greater than 21mmHg. In practice, the measurement with the Goldmann tonometer is done in a seated position due to the need to be installed behind a slit lamp. An anesthetic drop such as oxybuprocaine or tetracaine is instilled onto the ocular surface followed by a fluorescein drop. GAT may be associated with discomfort due to the need for topical anaesthesia which causes a burning sensation during about 30 secondes. Moreover, the patient must be compliant and the need to be seated makes measurement very difficult for some patients: pediatric, dementia, hight BMI or elderly people.

Rebound tonometers determine intraocular pressure by bouncing a small plastic tipped metal probe against the cornea.

As IOP increases, impact time decreases and rebound increases. It is portable, does not require the use of eye drops and is particularly suitable for children and non-cooperative patients. The examination is painless and can be performed without contact anesthesia. Different versions of tonometer using this principle exist. With the Icare 200 six measurements are taken. The 2 extreme values are eliminated and the average of the 4 remaining values gives the IOP.

In healthy subjects, the Icare tonometer gives results comparable to those of the Goldmann tonometer (1) with differences of less than 3 mmHg in 80% of cases (2).

In the literature, the type of rebound tonometer differs from that used in our study. Most of the previous studies compare the Icare RT01i, the Icare PRO, the Icare ONE, the Icare HOME or even the Icare 100 which are much older versions.

The Icare 200, the most recent model dating from 2018, has benefited from technical improvements. Intraocular pressure can be taken in any position.

Only one article in the literature has studied the diagnostic performance of Icare200 to date. In this study, Icare200 was compared with the Perkins tonometer in 2 groups of people, one group of healthy subjects and one group of patients with congenital glaucoma.

To date, we have no studies investigating the diagnostic performance of the iCare200 compared to the Goldmann tonometer. It is the interest of this study to compare the relationship of the IOP measurements obtained by Icare 200, Air Puff Tonometer and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry.

For this we have chosen to carry out a prospective study. We have chosen to include consenting adult patients consulting in ophthalmology consultation at Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital. This results in a large panel of patients with different IOP in order to observe enough IOP variability.

IOP measurements appear to correlate with corneal pachymetry (3). So, we chose to organize 4 subgroups according to pachymetry estimated by TONOREF III (high pachymetry, i.e. corneal thickness greater than 560um; low pachymetry, i.e. corneal thickness less than 500um; normal pachymetry, i.e. corneal thickness between 500 and 560um and subnormal pachymetry, i.e. corneal thickness between 500 and 520um).

Patient anxiety during tonometry will be measured using a visual analogue scale.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Glaucoma Eye

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

all participants receive the same intervention
Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

patients requiring an IOP (intra-Ocular Pression) measurement

group representing adults patients in ophthalmologic consultation requiring an IOP measurement

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Intraocular pression

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

First, measurement of the eye pressure by air-puff tonometry and estimation of the pachymetries with the TONOREF III.

Secondly, measurement of the eye pressure by GAT. Thirdly, measurement of the eye pressure by Icare 200.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Intraocular pression

First, measurement of the eye pressure by air-puff tonometry and estimation of the pachymetries with the TONOREF III.

Secondly, measurement of the eye pressure by GAT. Thirdly, measurement of the eye pressure by Icare 200.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult man ou woman who consults in ophthalmology for a reason justifying an IOP measurement
* Able to give informed consent
* Being affiliated with a social security system

Exclusion Criteria

* Participants who are unable to have IOP measured by Goldmann Tonometry
* Participants who are unable to have IOP measured by air puff Tonometry
* Age younger than 18 years
* Inability to sit
* Corneal ulcer
* Refractive surgery
* Corneal Astigmatism \>3D
* Participants who wear contact lenses
* Pregnancy
* Unable to give consent
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Adrien Coutu

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CHU de Clermont-Ferrand

Clermont-Ferrand, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2021-A00556-35

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

RBHP 2021 COUTU

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

aICP in Glaucoma and Papilledema
NCT02410148 UNKNOWN NA