Evaluation of an Active Decision Support System for Hemodynamic Optimization During High Risk Vascular Surgery
NCT ID: NCT03012919
Last Updated: 2017-06-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
31 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-02-28
2016-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The investigators developed an active clinical decision support system based on an institutional GDT-protocol using fluid, vasopressors and inotropes using the LiDCOrapid device.
The goal of the study was to check the feasibility of an active clinical decision support system to optimize hemodynamics during high risk vascular surgery based on the principles of GDT implementing fluid, vasopressors and inotropes.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effects of GDHT (Goal Directed Hemodynamic Therapy) Using a Non-invasive Hemodynamic Monitoring in Elective Neurosurgery
NCT07101991
Intraoperative Haemodynamic Optimization Comparing Flow and Pressure Parameters
NCT02104687
The Effect of Perioperative Cardiac Output-guided GDT on Oxygen Delivery, Consumption, and Microcirculatory Perfusion
NCT05090254
Assisted Fluid Management vs Manual GDFT
NCT03141411
Goal-directed Hemodynamic Therapy in Patiens Undergoing Major Hepatic Resection
NCT04517409
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
active decision support system (GDT protocol)
The active decision support system in this study is a goal directed therapy (GDT) protocol where threshold hemodynamic values are defined when to give fluid, vasopressors and inotropes. Hemodynamic values are measured with the LiDCOrapid device, which uses pulse contour analysis to continuously monitor cardiac output and respiratory variations in stroke volume (SVV).
active decision support system
The active decision support system in this study is a goal directed therapy (GDT) protocol where threshold hemodynamic values are defined when to give fluid, vasopressors and inotropes. Hemodynamic values are measured with the LiDCOrapid device, which uses pulse contour analysis to continuously monitor cardiac output and respiratory variations in stroke volume (SVV).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
active decision support system
The active decision support system in this study is a goal directed therapy (GDT) protocol where threshold hemodynamic values are defined when to give fluid, vasopressors and inotropes. Hemodynamic values are measured with the LiDCOrapid device, which uses pulse contour analysis to continuously monitor cardiac output and respiratory variations in stroke volume (SVV).
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* absence of cardiac sinus rhythm at induction of anesthesia
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Medical University of Vienna
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Arabella Fischer, MD
Dr.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Martin Dworschak, Prof. Dr.
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Medical University of Vienna
Michael Hiesmayr, Prof. Dr.
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Medical University of Vienna
Johannes Menger, Dr.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Medical University of Vienna
Arabella Fischer, Dr.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Medical University of Vienna
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Fitzgerald M, Cameron P, Mackenzie C, Farrow N, Scicluna P, Gocentas R, Bystrzycki A, Lee G, O'Reilly G, Andrianopoulos N, Dziukas L, Cooper DJ, Silvers A, Mori A, Murray A, Smith S, Xiao Y, Stub D, McDermott FT, Rosenfeld JV. Trauma resuscitation errors and computer-assisted decision support. Arch Surg. 2011 Feb;146(2):218-25. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2010.333.
Feldheiser A, Conroy P, Bonomo T, Cox B, Garces TR, Spies C; Anaesthesia Working Group of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(R)) Society; Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society. Development and feasibility study of an algorithm for intraoperative goaldirected haemodynamic management in noncardiac surgery. J Int Med Res. 2012;40(4):1227-41. doi: 10.1177/147323001204000402.
Sondergaard S, Wall P, Cocks K, Parkin WG, Leaning MS. High concordance between expert anaesthetists' actions and advice of decision support system in achieving oxygen delivery targets in high-risk surgery patients. Br J Anaesth. 2012 Jun;108(6):966-72. doi: 10.1093/bja/aes037. Epub 2012 Mar 16.
Sahota N, Lloyd R, Ramakrishna A, Mackay JA, Prorok JC, Weise-Kelly L, Navarro T, Wilczynski NL, Haynes RB; CCDSS Systematic Review Team. Computerized clinical decision support systems for acute care management: a decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review of effects on process of care and patient outcomes. Implement Sci. 2011 Aug 3;6:91. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-91.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1967/2014
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.