Testing the Effectiveness of an Occupation-based Cultural Intervention in Long-term Care

NCT ID: NCT03009851

Last Updated: 2017-01-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

21 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-09-30

Study Completion Date

2016-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goals of the proposed research were to:

1. describe the person and environment characteristics and activity patterns of residents in long-term care (LTC) facilities;
2. modify the evidence-based, occupation-based cultural heritage intervention (OBCHI) grounded on the results of Aim 1;
3. test the effectiveness of the OBCHI intended to facilitate adaptation to relocation into LTC facilities relative to a usual activities group;
4. determine the cost-effectiveness of the intervention conducted by in-house staff compared to the control group; and
5. examine person and environment factors as potential moderators of the relationship between treatment condition and adaptation outcomes.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Specific Aims

Primary Aims

1. Describe the person and environment characteristics and activity patterns of residents in LTC facilities.
2. Modify the OBCHI grounded on the evidence-based results of Aim 1 specific to these facilities and residents.
3. Test the effectiveness of the OBCHI conducted by activity department staff, relative to usual activities, as measured by quality of life, activity engagement, and social participation.

H1a-c: Those receiving OBCHI will have significantly greater improvement in

a) quality of life, b) activity engagement, and c) social participation at post-intervention relative to those receiving usual activities.

H2a-c: Those receiving OBCHI will have greater maintenance of improvements in a) quality of life, b) activity engagement, and c) social participation at 1-month follow-up, relative to those receiving usual activities.
4. Determine the cost-effectiveness of the intervention in terms of quality adjusted life year (QALY) and other health factors.

H3: When OBCHI is proven to be more effective in promoting quality of life than usual activities, the investigators will expect the OBCHI to produce a higher QALY at a lower cost per QALY.

H4: Between these two mutually exclusive treatments, the OBCHI intervention will be more efficient (more effective and less costly) or cost saving with a negative incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) when compared to those receiving usual activities.

Exploratory Aim
5. Examine person characteristics (i.e. cultural heritage, life experiences social support, resilience, depression, and resident demographics \[age, gender, ethnicity\]) and select environment characteristics (i.e., participant perceptions of the intervention and facility) as potential moderators of the relationship between treatment condition (OBCHI versus usual care) and change in adaptation outcomes from pre- to post-intervention.

Table 1. Timeline of Person/Environment Factors, Outcomes and Tools

Person Characteristics Tools Baseline 1 wk. post 1 m. follow-up

Cognitive Screen SPMSQ x

Life Experience Interview x

Social Support Yesterday Interview x x x

Resilience Resilience Scale x

Depression GDS-15 x x x

Environment Characteristics

LTC Facility Setting Site Demographics x

Resident Perceptions SCES x x x Intervention Evaluation (midway) x

Staff Perceptions Questionnaire x x

Outcomes

QoL QOLI/SF-12 x x x

Cost Effectiveness SF-12 x x x

Activity Engagement and Social Participation Yesterday Interview x x x

Significance

As the need for LTC increases with the steady growth of older adults, relocation into residential settings will grow. About 70 percent of persons over 65 will require spending time in LTC services, with 40 percent requiring nursing home care for a period of time. Relocation is moving from one permanent home to another permanent home which is sometimes precipitated by an illness and considered a significant life event. Skinner noted a forced relocation could have disturbing effects upon the elderly including loss of social and community connections. However, even with a planned relocation, encountering this new and unfamiliar environment requires the older person to rethink the ways in which his or her life will differ with adjustment duration of a few weeks to several years. Many factors determine the ways in which this 'new life' will evolve including: past adaptive strategies and life experiences, family support systems, socioeconomic resources, and cultural values.

Moving from a familiar environment to an unfamiliar one involves adaptation, regardless of age. Adaptation is a process involving interaction between the person and environment. Indicators of successful adaptation to LTC have included: developing a sense of identity and place, having care needs met, knowing and being known to other residents, maintaining or developing social networks, continuity of lifestyle, and maintaining control over life situations. As defined for this study, adaptation is a normal process by which a person encounters a perceived challenge in the environment and is able to successfully manage that challenge as measured by increased quality of life, activity engagement and social participation. Central to adaptation is the cultural heritage that an individual brings to the LTC facility upon relocation. Because culture is the learned beliefs, values, customs, actions, communication, and life ways of an individual, it can be expected to permeate all aspects of life in a residential facility. Attention to an individual's cultural heritage has begun to make in-roads to the daily life routines encountered in these facilities.

Acknowledgement of the resident's culture is a major contributing factor to his/her quality of life (QOL). However, QOL is a complex construct and has been used synonymously with terms like well-being, life satisfaction, and functional health. Lawton asserted that QOL is a collection of dimensions comprised of both objective and subjective factors which may include all or some of the following: behavioral competence, objective environment, perceived QOL, psychological well-being, and health-related status. Other factors associated with QOL include: interaction with family and friends, personal qualities, room and meal items, number of health problems, staff-resident ratios and continuity of care. These findings attest to the importance of a person-environment 'match' when QOL issues for residents are considered.

Incorporating meaningful activity and social connections into the lives of elders that have been circumscribed by illness and disability is particularly important to QOL. Gerontological literature concerning the activities of elders has concentrated upon personal care and instrumental activities and how they contribute to health and functional status. These obligatory tasks are essential to one's survival, but perhaps even more significant to an elder's well-being are those discretionary activities involving social and meaningful occupations; such findings support the proposition that activity and social support systems are important in mediating the impact of illness on well-being.

In summary, the relationship of relocation, culture, adaptation, QOL, activity engagement, and social participation is reflected in outcomes where failure to provide culturally competent and culturally sensitive care have occurred. With increasing diversity of the US population, practitioners are challenged to deliver culturally competent services and to improve the QOL for diverse LTC residents.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Fragility

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

OBCHI

This small group process intervention focuses upon the cultural heritage of the residents in LTC settings measuring quality of life, activity engagement and social participation.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

OBCHI

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Occupation-based cultural heritage intervention emphasizing the cultural background of residents in LTC settings.

Control

The control group only received the typical activities conducted in LTC facilities.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

OBCHI

Occupation-based cultural heritage intervention emphasizing the cultural background of residents in LTC settings.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

occupation-based cultural heritage intervention

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* English speaking, less than one year from admission, cognitive level of 4/5 on SPMSQ

Exclusion Criteria

* non English speaking, more than one year in LTC, and less than cut off score on SPMSQ
Minimum Eligible Age

55 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Retirement Research Foundation

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Texas Woman's University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Donna Tilley, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Texas Woman's University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Texas Woman's University

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RRF 2014-090

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.