Maxillary Expansion Effects in Children With Upper Airway Obstruction

NCT ID: NCT03004300

Last Updated: 2019-10-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-07-13

Study Completion Date

2020-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The most frequent causes of mouth breathers are the adenotonsillar hypertrophy. Adenotonsillectomy is the main choice for the elimination of the obstruction. However, this surgical treatment does not have its effect well elucidated and apnea has been cited in the literature as a residual outcome. Other types of supporting treatment may also been involved such as the use of corticosteroids, physiotherapy and orthodontic-orthopedic treatment, among them rapid maxillary expansion (RME).

RME corrects the morphological constriction of the upper arch caused by buccal breathing and also reduce the airway resistance. Despite reports of RME influencing volume enhancement in pharyngeal airway, there are still few three-dimensional studies following the post-expansion effects. In addition, these changes are doubtful due postural changes of the tongue during the tomography exam. Conflicts of results are also present for changes in the nasal septum of children. The main alteration mentioned is the increase in the length of the lower third of the septum.

The investigators propose a randomized, prospective, controlled clinical trial in patients with atresic maxilla with or without adenotonsillar hypertrophy. The patients will be treated with RME and adenotonsillectomy when the obstruction is present. The purpose of this study is elucidate if there is different outcomes considering the moment of RME treatment before or after the adenotonsillectomy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Airway Obstruction

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

group 1

Patients with atresic maxilla without upper airway obstruction submitted to rapid maxillary expansion

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Rapid maxillary expansion

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Device

group 2

Patients with atresic maxilla and adenotonsillar hypertrophy submitted to rapid maxillary expansion before adenotonsillectomy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Rapid maxillary expansion

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Device

Adenotonsillectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Surgery

group 3

Patients with atresic maxilla and adenotonsillar hypertrophy submitted to rapid maxillary expansion after adenotonsillectomy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Rapid maxillary expansion

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Device

Adenotonsillectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Surgery

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Rapid maxillary expansion

Device

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Adenotonsillectomy

Surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

maxillary expansion

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Children (boys and girls) between 5 and 9 years of age.
* Atresic maxilla.
* Skeletal Class I
* With or without Adenotonsillar hypertrophy
* Parents or tutors sign Informed Consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* Craniofacial syndromes or neurologic disease diagnosis.
* History of adenotonsillectomy and orthodontic treatment
* History of facial trauma
* Morbid obesity
* Premature loss of posterior teeth
Minimum Eligible Age

5 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

9 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universidade Federal de Goias

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

José Valladares Neto

PHD Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jose Valladares Neto, PHD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Universidade Federal de Goiás

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Faculdade de Odontologia

Goiás, Goiás, Brazil

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Brazil

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Guilleminault C, Monteyrol PJ, Huynh NT, Pirelli P, Quo S, Li K. Adeno-tonsillectomy and rapid maxillary distraction in pre-pubertal children, a pilot study. Sleep Breath. 2011 May;15(2):173-7. doi: 10.1007/s11325-010-0419-3. Epub 2010 Sep 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20848317 (View on PubMed)

de Castilho LS, Abreu MH, de Oliveira RB, Souza E Silva ME, Resende VL. Factors associated with mouth breathing in children with -developmental -disabilities. Spec Care Dentist. 2016 Mar-Apr;36(2):75-9. doi: 10.1111/scd.12157. Epub 2016 Jan 13.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26763202 (View on PubMed)

Caprioglio A, Meneghel M, Fastuca R, Zecca PA, Nucera R, Nosetti L. Rapid maxillary expansion in growing patients: correspondence between 3-dimensional airway changes and polysomnography. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Jan;78(1):23-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2013.10.011. Epub 2013 Oct 25.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24231036 (View on PubMed)

Chang Y, Koenig LJ, Pruszynski JE, Bradley TG, Bosio JA, Liu D. Dimensional changes of upper airway after rapid maxillary expansion: a prospective cone-beam computed tomography study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Apr;143(4):462-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.11.019.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23561406 (View on PubMed)

Varni JW, Seid M, Kurtin PS. PedsQL 4.0: reliability and validity of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory version 4.0 generic core scales in healthy and patient populations. Med Care. 2001 Aug;39(8):800-12. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200108000-00006.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11468499 (View on PubMed)

Bruni O, Ottaviano S, Guidetti V, Romoli M, Innocenzi M, Cortesi F, Giannotti F. The Sleep Disturbance Scale for Children (SDSC). Construction and validation of an instrument to evaluate sleep disturbances in childhood and adolescence. J Sleep Res. 1996 Dec;5(4):251-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2869.1996.00251.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9065877 (View on PubMed)

Fernandes FM, Teles Rda C. Application of the Portuguese version of the Obstructive Sleep Apnea-18 survey to children. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Nov-Dec;79(6):720-6. doi: 10.5935/1808-8694.20130132.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24474484 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

044029

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.