Cold Versus Hot Adenoidectomy for Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Pediatric Patients
NCT ID: NCT03760341
Last Updated: 2019-09-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
80 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-10-01
2019-03-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Objective: To compare the advantages using the hot method compared to the cold method adenoidectomy in the long term follow up.
Methods: A prospective, randomized, single blinded study of children undergoing adenoidectomy between the years 2014-2017. Patients were randomized to hot or cold adenoidectomy techniques. The primary outcome was change of the Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire Score (PSQ) scores one month and one year after surgery.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Adeno-tonsillectomy in Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea
NCT03475329
Effect of CPAP and Adenotonsillectomy in Upper Airway Volume of Children With OSAS
NCT03169491
Coblation Versus Cold Adenoidectomy -Safety and Efficiency
NCT02312947
Surgical Versus Nonsurgical Treatment on Quality of Life for Children With Controversial OSA Diagnoses
NCT03370731
Inferior Turbinate Reduction in Pediatric Population Failing Surgery for Sleep Disordered Breathing
NCT00936494
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Obstructive sleep apnea could cause pulmonary and cardiovascular complications, and could influence negatively the l quality of life of the child. Adenoidectomy with or without tonsillectomy is one of the most common procedures done by the otolaryngologist. Adenoidectomy is performed under general anesthesia .The main indications for the procedure include adenoid hypertrophy, obstructive sleep apnea, chronic adenoiditis, and chronic otitis media (ref 1).
Historically recommended instrumentation for performing adenoidectomy has varied from a steel nail, cutting or biting forceps, adenotomes and adenoid curettes.
In 2009 the National institute for health and clinical excellence has published guidelines on the use of suction diathermia adenoidectomy which showed that the method is as effective as or even more than cold method, the method is considered more secure with some advantage in terms of complications of adenoidectomy2, Several studies compared different surgical methods for adenoidectomy. Usually the parameters for comparison were : surgery time, amount of bleeding, complications and regrowth rate (ref 2). None of them examined long term clinical outcome.
The GOLD STANDARD in terms of evaluation of sleep apnea in children is PSG (Polysomnography). However, due to the availability and cost of this test, new methods for assessing these children are studied. Alternatively, some questionnaires were prepared in order to evaluate obstructive sleep apnea in children. One of these questionnaires is the PEDIATRIC SLEEP QUESTIONNARE that contains 22 easy to understand questions which should be answered by YES/NO/IDONT KNOW (ref 3). A result of \>0.33 (more than 7 questions answered by yes) should be taken to PSG . In the year 2000 the same group that created the questionnaire published an article in the Sleep Medicine Journal that showed high sensitivity and high validity for sleep apnea diagnosis. The conclusion was that this questionnaire can replace the PSG in clinical trials (ref 3). In 2007 the same group released another study which demonstrates the advantage of the questionnaire compared to PSG evaluation in terms of cognitive and behavioral morbidity of in OSA (Obstructive Sleep Apnea) (ref 4).
In this study the investigators aim to investigate whether there any advantages using SUCTION DIATHERMY in adenoidectomy versus Cold method adenoidectomy in terms of sleep questionnaire score.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
cold adenoidectomy group
this group of patient will undergo adenoidectomy by the cold method intervention: adenoidectomy - cold method
adenoidectomy - cold method
a surgery for adenoid removal or reduction under general anesthesia using surgical curretes
hot method adenoidectomy
this group of patient will undergo adenoidectomy by the cold method intervention: adenoidectomy - hot method
adenoidectomy - hot method
a surgery for adenoid removal or reduction under general anesthesia using suction diathermy
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
adenoidectomy - cold method
a surgery for adenoid removal or reduction under general anesthesia using surgical curretes
adenoidectomy - hot method
a surgery for adenoid removal or reduction under general anesthesia using suction diathermy
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Children with obstructive sleep apnea
3. Children whose parents agreed to be enrolled in the research
Exclusion Criteria
2. Refusal for participation by the parent.
3. a diagnosis of malignancy
4. Unable to adhere follow up
1 Year
15 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Rambam Health Care Campus
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Arie Gordin, MD
Head of pediatric otolaryngology division
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
0087-14-RMB
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.