Sleep Disordered Breathing, Adenotonsillectomy, Cognition and Pre-school Age Children
NCT ID: NCT02945306
Last Updated: 2018-05-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
4 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-12-31
2018-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
There is no set treatment in the UK today. Children may be offered adenotonsillectomy or watchful waiting; it is not know which, long term, is the right thing to do. Therefore the investigators wish to do a study looking at these two different treatments to see if there is a difference in children's learning over time between the two different treatments. The investigators will look at children with SDB, measure their learning (and behaviour) and then randomly select which children get one treatment or the other. They will then re-measure learning (and behaviour) 7 months later to see if there is any difference between the two groups. The investigators will also scientifically measure their sleep. This is possibly quite a difficult study to do, the investigators are unsure whether families will agree to take part and how easy it will be to measure learning with such young children (aged 2:6 - 5).
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Adenotonsillectomy for Obstructive Sleep-Disordered Breathing in Childhood:The Chania Community Oximetry-Based Study
NCT01918007
Outcomes of Partial Versus Complete Tonsillectomy for Obstructive Sleep Disordered Breathing
NCT00519402
Effect of Adenotonsillectomy on Spinal Curve Magnitude in Children With Sleep-Disordered Breathing
NCT07332780
High Blood Pressure in Paediatric Patients With Sleep Disorder Breathing.
NCT03696654
Brain Changes in Pediatric OSA
NCT05368077
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
More than 60% of children who snore regularly at 3 years of age have stopped regularly snoring by 7 years of age. They grow out of SDB with no active treatment. If their tonsils and adenoids are removed 80% will immediately stop snoring (and will be cured). Research shows that if tonsils and adenoids are removed at 6-8 years old, there is no difference in cognitive abilities between the group who had adenotonsillectomy and those that did not.
It is not known if several years of habitual snoring, sleep fragmentation and recurrent short-lived episodes of hypoxia cause minor changes to the developing brain causing cognitive weakness. Therefore it is not known if taking tonsils and adenoids out at a young age (2-4 years) when they first start snoring, thus avoiding several years of habitual snoring, sleep fragmentation and recurrent mild hypoxia, makes a difference to cognition in the future. It is not known if a period of a number of years of habitual snoring (with possible sleep fragmentation and recurrent episodes of hypoxia) causes irreversible cognitive weakness, reversible cognitive weakness or no cognitive weakness at all.
35,000 children undergo adenotonsillectomy in England and Wales per year with the second most common indication being SDB (habitual snoring and other features of recurrent upper airway obstruction).
The balance of benefits versus detrimental effects of adenotonsillectomy in children with SDB is not accurately known. The detrimental effects are well known. They include significant pain for at least 7 days for most children, bleeding after the operation in 1%, and very, very rarely death. The benefits are less clear. Adenotonsillectomy in pre-school age children with SDB results in improved behaviour and quality of life scores in the short term but it is not known if there is an effect on cognition. The effect of adenotonsillectomy on cognitive development versus the effect of watchful waiting with supportive care (treatment of associated conditions such as chronic otitis media with effusion and rhinitis) needs investigation, if clinicians are to give families a true description of advantages and disadvantages of surgery for SDB.
The investigators therefore need to ask the question - Does adenotonsillectomy in preschool age children alter future cognitive development? Answering this question will require a large, multicentre randomised controlled study.
This study aims to assess the feasibility of carrying out this large randomised control trial. It will try to answer the following questions:
1. Can the investigators effectively measure cognition in preschool age children?
2. Will parents be prepared to take part in such a study?
3. Can the investigators obtain useful sleep studies in these young children at home?
4. Will children stay in the study long enough to allow follow up?
5. Can the investigators define values allowing us to power a larger randomised control trial?
6. Does the SRBD scale work as a pragmatic screening tool for SDB in a UK population? Although numbers in this study will be small, the investigators may find a large difference in outcomes between the two groups making a larger randomised control trial unnecessary. Data from this study will therefore be analysed.
Recruitment:
All children between 2.6 years and 5 years, referred to two ENT surgeons in Middlesbrough by General Practitioners in the Teesside geographical area with possible SDB will be considered for recruitment into the trial. They will be offered entry into the trial if they meet inclusion and exclusion criteria. The aim of these criteria is to have a study population of children with the typical clinical features of SDB that would be actively considered by informed ENT surgeons as possibly being offered adenotonsillectomy as a treatment in typical UK practice.
Clear inclusion and exclusion criteria will be in place to delineate this population.
Randomisation:
Participants will be randomised to one of two treatments, either early removal of tonsils and adenoids under general anaesthesia or watchful waiting, to allow the child to potentially grow out of the condition without surgical intervention.
Consent:
Clear unambiguous information will be provided to the parents/guardians of prospective participants at the time that they receive their outpatient appointment letter. This information will be provided in the form of the patient information sheet.Treatment decisions for SBD are made at the time of the ENT outpatient clinic. Therefore receiving this information before the outpatient appointment allows the parent/guardian adequate time to consider the study fully before they're asked whether or not they wish to participate. The participants being recruited are children too young to provide consent or assent; it is therefore important that the parents of the participants are well informed and have time to consider the information fully. Parents/guardians will be offered the opportunity to ask any questions that they may have at the time of the outpatient clinic and will also be made aware that participation is voluntary and can be withdrawn at any time. The consent form will be completed with the research psychologist to ensure that the parent/guardian is fully aware of what the trial involves and is therefore making an informed choice. The research psychologist has had training in mental capacity assessment and is competent in assessing and ensuring comprehension and reasoned decision making. If eligible the participant will be offered entry into the study and parents will provide informed consent at the time of their clinic attendance. This will avoid delay in the assessment or treatment process and is in line with the treatment format of the clinic.
Risks, burdens and benefits:
The investigators do not know what is the best course of treatment for young children with SDB. There is a single study of preschool age children with SDB with a low follow up rate (Biggs. PLoS One 2015). This study found no difference in cognitive development or behaviour at 3 years post diagnosis irrespective of whether the child had undergone adenotonsillectomy or not. These children had cognitive weakness compared to non-snoring controls, and this got worse whether they received surgical treatment or were just observed. Current practice of offering adenotonsillectomy may be subjecting children to a painful operation which offers them no long term benefit. Set against this, adenotonsillectomy is known to immediately improve quality of life in older children but it is not know if the difference seen at 7 months post randomisation is still present 2-3 years later if children have grown out of SDB. This study therefore has equipoise.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Adenotonsillectomy
Removal of tonsils and adenoids under a general anaesthetic
Adenotonsillectomy
Watchful waiting with supportive care
Reassurance with active medical treatment of conditions associated with Sleep Disordered Breathing such as otitis media with effusion and allergic rhinitis
Watchful waiting with supportive care
Use of widely prescribed medicines to treat associated conditions
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Adenotonsillectomy
Watchful waiting with supportive care
Use of widely prescribed medicines to treat associated conditions
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. A diagnosis of SDB based on clinical criteria.
3. Enlarged tonsils on examination (2 or more on standard Brodsky scale)
Exclusion Criteria
2. Known genetic, cranio-facial or psychiatric condition likely to affect airway, cognition or behaviour
3. Obesity (Body Mass Index \> 2.5 standard deviation from mean for age and gender)
4. Severe OSA (Apnoea Hypopnoea Index greater than 30 / hour on sleep study)
5. Severe chronic health conditions that may hamper participation. This may include severe congenital heart disease, cystic fibrosis, sickle cell anaemia, or poorly controlled epilepsy)
6. A history of significant hypertension (defined as greater than the 99th percentile (CDC prediction equations) plus 5mmHg for either systolic or diastolic.
7. Concurrent use of ADHD medicines, psychotropic medications (anti-depressants, anxiolytics, anti-psychotics), hypnotics or anti convulsants.
8. Previous adenotonsillectomy, tonsillectomy or adenoidectomy.
9. Receiving Continuous Positive Airway Pressure as a treatment
10. A parent or Guardian who is unable to read and thus understand the consent form.
11. A family planning to move out of the area within the next 9 months.
12. Severe snoring since birth.
30 Months
5 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Leeds
OTHER
South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mike Tremlett
Consultant Anaesthetist
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Michael R Tremlett, BM, FRCA
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
South Tees Hospitals NHS FT
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The James Cook University Hospital
Middlesbrough, Cleveland, United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2016048
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.