IL-1ra Dose-range Study for Moderate-to-severe TBI Patients
NCT ID: NCT02997371
Last Updated: 2017-05-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE2
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-10-31
2021-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
In order to fully understand, and potentially optimize, the effect of Kineret, the investigators wish to conduct a dose-response study by giving three cohorts (n=20 per group) either placebo (isotonic saline), 1.5g or 3.0g of active substance administered intravenously in a double-blind, randomized setting. The concentrations have in previous studies not been shown to present any side-effects (Singh et al., 2014). The drug will be provided within 12 hours after trauma. The goal will be to provide a dose-response effect on the cerebral inflammatory response. As secondary goals, the investigators will assess the brain damage by measuring proteins in blood and cerebrospinal fluid, functional outcome and inflammation in the brain using positron emission tomography.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Exploring Cerebrolysin in Late Thrombectomy for Stroke: Blood-brain Barrier Biomarkers and Imaging Insights
NCT06339411
Low-Frequency REpetitive TRanscranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined With Endovascular Treatment in ACute Ischemic StrokE
NCT06064747
Endovascular Therapy for Large Core Patients With Uncertain Response to Thrombectomy
NCT06961487
National Retrospective Study Of Recanalization Treatments In Pediatric Arterial Ischemic Stroke
NCT03887143
Determinants of Penumbra in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients
NCT01323413
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The hypothesis is that an increasing dose of the anti-inflammatory drug recombinant human Interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra, Kineret) will modulate the inflammatory state of the traumatically injured brain, which will attenuate the injurious processes that occur following TBI.
Study Design
While different doses of Anakinra have been used in trials, there is no knowledge of what constitutes an optimized concentration of the drug. To address this limitation, the current study will be a dose-response study in a double blind randomised clinical fashion, using placebo (n=20), 1.5 g ("intermediate dose") or (n=20) and 3.0 g ("high dose")(n=20) of Anakinra provided the first 48 hours (drug/placebo administered initially as 500 mg infusion bolus and later as an 1g or 2.5g infusion for 48 hours). Thus, a total of n=60 patients will be included. Sample-size analyses have indicated that the number of patients is sufficient to detect differences in the inflammatory response as gauged with cytokine measurements using cerebral microdialysis.
As surrogate markers of outcome for these patients, several protein biomarkers of brain injury and proteins of the innate immune responses will be quantified using techniques called ELISA and multiplex assay technology. The investigators also wish to use radiological techniques, such as magnetic resonance imaging to study damages in white matter tracts in the brain and positron emission tomography to assess the degree of microglial activation. All these methods will be used to assess the potential benefit of the treatment vs placebo.
By this type of study design, it will minimize bias and confounders that may influence the study.
Patient Recruitment
Patients with a clinical diagnosis of severe and moderate TBI will be identified by the research team at the daily departmental neuro-critical care unit meeting. Patients meeting the inclusion criteria will be approached for consent/assent if conscious or if next of kin is present. If not, consent will be assumed as we know Anakinra to be safe and there is likely to be a narrow therapeutic window. With the current patient load at Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, the investigators deem it possible to recruit one patient per week, thus estimating that the recruiting phase will take approximately two years to complete.
Sampling
All the sampling will be conducted during the acute phase when the patient is unconscious in the neuro-critical care unit. Microdialysis probes are sampled hourly. To assess inflammatory activity in the brain, positron emission tomography will be performed within the first week and after 2-3 weeks. Magnetic resonance imaging will be performed the first 2-3 weeks and then after 6 months. To measure the patient's adaptive immune response to brain specific proteins, specialised auto-immunisation assays will be performed on patient blood at day 1-3 following injury as well as after 2-3 weeks.
During the intensive care phase, blood and cerebrospinal fluid will be sampled twice per day (approximately 3mL per sampling time per compartment, volumes that we do not deem harmful to the patient) and will be collected together with hourly microdialysate fluid samples the first 7 days from admission. Blood will also be sampled at an outpatient clinic follow up at 6 and 12 months following injury. Patient samples will be anonymised and stored at -80degC in the Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge before analysis.
It will not to be possible to measure cytokines, the drug and biomarkers from all microdialysis samples due to volume constraints. Moreover, we believe that a temporal resolution of 6 hours is probably adequate for the brain concentration of the drug while 12 hours is sufficient in serum. APP and tau will also be measured every 6 hours. The only parameter that will be hourly analysed in microdialysis is cytokine and chemokines through a luminex panel.
Clinical Follow-up
Patients will be followed up at a clinic visit at 6 and 12 months after trauma by questionnaire survey using standardised outcome measures in neurosurgical patients including the golden standard extended Glasgow Outcome Score and Short Form 36.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Placebo
Isotonic saline administered as an injection and infusion
Isotonic saline
Placebo, administration as initially intravenous injection followed by a intravenous infusion
1.5 g Kineret
Kineret provided as a 500 mg injection followed by a 1g infusion.
Anakinra Prefilled Syringe
Administration as initially intravenous injection followed by a intravenous infusion
3.0 g Kineret
Kineret provided as a 500 mg injection followed by a 2.5g infusion.
Anakinra Prefilled Syringe
Administration as initially intravenous injection followed by a intravenous infusion
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Anakinra Prefilled Syringe
Administration as initially intravenous injection followed by a intravenous infusion
Isotonic saline
Placebo, administration as initially intravenous injection followed by a intravenous infusion
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Be aged 18-65
3. The first dose of Kineret (or placebo) must be provided within 12 hours after trauma.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Follow up not possible
3. Not suitable for insertion of cranial access device to monitor the brain (such as bleeding complications)
4. Active immunosuppression therapy (evidence of neutropenia, immunosuppression secondary to immunomodulatory medications, chemotherapy or radiation therapy in the 3 months preceding study entry)
5. Severe Renal Insufficiency or End Stage Renal Disease (defined as a creatinine clearance \<30 ml/min)
6. Pregnancy/Nursing mothers
7. Known hypersensitivity to E. coli derived products
8. Administration of live vaccine
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
OTHER
Adel Helmy
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Adel Helmy
MA, MB BChir, PhD, FRCS (SN)
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Adel Helmy, MA, MB BChir, FRCS, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Cambridge
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Cambridge University Hospital NHS Trust
Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Allan SM, Tyrrell PJ, Rothwell NJ. Interleukin-1 and neuronal injury. Nat Rev Immunol. 2005 Aug;5(8):629-40. doi: 10.1038/nri1664.
Bullock MR, Lyeth BG, Muizelaar JP. Current status of neuroprotection trials for traumatic brain injury: lessons from animal models and clinical studies. Neurosurgery. 1999 Aug;45(2):207-17; discussion 217-20. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199908000-00001.
Carney N, Totten AM, O'Reilly C, Ullman JS, Hawryluk GW, Bell MJ, Bratton SL, Chesnut R, Harris OA, Kissoon N, Rubiano AM, Shutter L, Tasker RC, Vavilala MS, Wilberger J, Wright DW, Ghajar J. Guidelines for the Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury, Fourth Edition. Neurosurgery. 2017 Jan 1;80(1):6-15. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001432.
Helmy A, Guilfoyle MR, Carpenter KL, Pickard JD, Menon DK, Hutchinson PJ. Recombinant human interleukin-1 receptor antagonist in severe traumatic brain injury: a phase II randomized control trial. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2014 May;34(5):845-51. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2014.23. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
Hyder AA, Wunderlich CA, Puvanachandra P, Gururaj G, Kobusingye OC. The impact of traumatic brain injuries: a global perspective. NeuroRehabilitation. 2007;22(5):341-53.
Lucas SM, Rothwell NJ, Gibson RM. The role of inflammation in CNS injury and disease. Br J Pharmacol. 2006 Jan;147 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S232-40. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0706400.
Singh N, Hopkins SJ, Hulme S, Galea JP, Hoadley M, Vail A, Hutchinson PJ, Grainger S, Rothwell NJ, King AT, Tyrrell PJ. The effect of intravenous interleukin-1 receptor antagonist on inflammatory mediators in cerebrospinal fluid after subarachnoid haemorrhage: a phase II randomised controlled trial. J Neuroinflammation. 2014 Jan 3;11:1. doi: 10.1186/1742-2094-11-1.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CCTU0185
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.