IVES for Treatment of UUI and OAB

NCT ID: NCT02992509

Last Updated: 2017-01-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

EARLY_PHASE1

Total Enrollment

17 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The pilot study is intended to show the efficacy of intravesical electrical stimulation in treating overactive bladder with or without frequency and/or urgency urinary incontinence.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The EMED Technologies detrusetTM intravesical electrical stimulation (IVES) catheter is indicated for use with the EMED detrusanTM 500 electrical generator for the treatment of overactive bladder and urge urinary incontinence (UI) in women who are not satisfied with or cannot tolerate other conservative treatments. EMED is interested in conducting a prospective randomized multi-center study of IVES therapy vs conventional UI treatments. In order to gain sufficient knowledge of the treatment effect and variability of IVES therapy to power an RCT, a pilot study will be initially conducted.

The pilot study is intended to show the efficacy of IVES in treating overactive bladder with or without frequency and/or urgency urinary incontinence with safety profile of IVES being no worse than with standard urological catheters.

A primary endpoint at 3 months showing reduction in incontinence events via a 7-level patient global impression of improvement will be established. Secondary endpoints will include PCI for subsets of symptoms, 3 day voiding diary, and patient satisfaction questionnaires.

Follow up at end of therapy and 3 months from the first therapy session will be conducted. 6-month, 9-month, and 12-month follow up can be conducted to establish durability of IVES therapy if it is found to be effective at 3 months after the first treatment

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Urinary Bladder, Overactive Urinary Incontinence, Urge

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Treatment

This pilot study group is a prospective observational study. It is not blinded and there is no control. This is a single arm study (treatment group) which will receive intravesical electrical stimulation with a total of 8 therapy sessions, each lasting 15 minutes. The sessions will be done in a serial fashion, 2 per week for 4 consecutive weeks.

Group Type OTHER

EMED detruset(TM) intravesical electrical stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

There will be a total of 8 therapy sessions, each lasting 15 minutes. The sessions will be done in a serial fashion, 2 per week for 4 consecutive weeks. The electrical parameters utilized will be those previously determined to be appropriate for OAB and UUI. As the beneficial effect of electrical stimulation is dependent on a "maximal" level of stimulation, the stimulation voltage will be increased during the first minute of treatment until the maximum tolerated by the patient is established and then backed-off by 1-2 Volts. The therapy will continue for 15 minutes in total for each session. The VAS will be marked by the patient before each treatment session throughout the therapy period, and other questionnaires will be administered.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

EMED detruset(TM) intravesical electrical stimulation

There will be a total of 8 therapy sessions, each lasting 15 minutes. The sessions will be done in a serial fashion, 2 per week for 4 consecutive weeks. The electrical parameters utilized will be those previously determined to be appropriate for OAB and UUI. As the beneficial effect of electrical stimulation is dependent on a "maximal" level of stimulation, the stimulation voltage will be increased during the first minute of treatment until the maximum tolerated by the patient is established and then backed-off by 1-2 Volts. The therapy will continue for 15 minutes in total for each session. The VAS will be marked by the patient before each treatment session throughout the therapy period, and other questionnaires will be administered.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Female
* 18-90 years old
* Urinary urge incontinence OR overactive bladder
* Prior trial of medical treatment for UUI or OAB

Exclusion Criteria

* pelvic organ prolapse greater than stage 1
* multiple sclerosis
* parkinson's disease
* spinal cord injury
* long-term DM type I
* prior surgeries that may affect innervation of the detrusor nerves or the spinal cord
* pregnancy
* pacemaker/defibrillator
* PVR \>150ml
* dementia
* Stress urinary incontinence
* intravesical botox injection within 1 year, PTNS within 6 months, or medical treatment for OAB within 3 weeks; bulking agent injection within 6 months
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Loma Linda University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Sam Siddighi, MD

Urogynecology/Pelvic Surgery, FPMRS

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sam Siddighi, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Loma Linda University Health

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Loma Linda University Health

Loma Linda, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Hagerty JA, Richards I, Kaplan WE. Intravesical electrotherapy for neurogenic bladder dysfunction: a 22-year experience. J Urol. 2007 Oct;178(4 Pt 2):1680-3; discussion 1683. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.188. Epub 2007 Aug 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17707024 (View on PubMed)

Cheng EY, Richards I, Balcom A, Steinhardt G, Diamond M, Rich M, Donovan JM, Carr MC, Reinberg Y, Hurt G, Chandra M, Bauer SB, Kaplan WE. Bladder stimulation therapy improves bladder compliance: results from a multi-institutional trial. J Urol. 1996 Aug;156(2 Pt 2):761-4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8683778 (View on PubMed)

Hong CH, Lee HY, Jin MH, Noh JY, Lee BH, Han SW. The effect of intravesical electrical stimulation on bladder function and synaptic neurotransmission in the rat spinal cord after spinal cord injury. BJU Int. 2009 Apr;103(8):1136-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08189.x. Epub 2008 Nov 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19021629 (View on PubMed)

Lombardi G, Musco S, Celso M, Ierardi A, Nelli F, Del Corso F, Del Popolo G. Intravesical electrostimulation versus sacral neuromodulation for incomplete spinal cord patients suffering from neurogenic non-obstructive urinary retention. Spinal Cord. 2013 Jul;51(7):571-8. doi: 10.1038/sc.2013.37. Epub 2013 Apr 30.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23628893 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

5130321

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.