Prognostic Impact of Tumor Growth Velocity in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated by Radio(Chemo)Therapy

NCT ID: NCT02990936

Last Updated: 2019-10-03

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
• Total Enrollment: 120 participants
• Study Classification: OBSERVATIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2019-11-01
• Study Completion Date: 2026-11-30

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the impact of tumor growth velocity on the survival of patients with hea and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated by (chemo-)radiotherapy.

Patients with stages I to IV oropharyngeal primary squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) elected for radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy with curative intent will be selected. Tumor volume and number and size of pathological neck lymph nodes (small diameter > 1 cm) will be assessed on diagnostic CT-scan (DiCT) and treatment planning CT-scan (RtCT) using the summation of areas technique. Tumor progression and tumor doubling time will be calculated based on DiCT and RtCT. Tumor proliferation will be assessed on biopsy specimens by Ki67 immunohistochemistry and mitotic index. HPV status will be evaluated by PCR and p16 immunohistochemistry. Ulcerative or exophytic aspect will be noticed. Tumoral kinetics patterns will be correlated with disease free survival and overall survival of patients with HNSCC. These patterns will be compared to HPV status and proliferation markers in order to study their clinical signification [time frame: 5 years] and develop predictive markers of tumor progression for head and neck cancers.

Detailed Description

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) represents more than 90 percent of head and neck tumors and is one of the most frequent human neoplasms. During the last decades, radiotherapy has emerged as a standard treatment of HNSCC and the number of patients treated with this modality has continuously increased. Moreover, treatment schedules for radiotherapy have improved and require more preparation and are therefore more time consuming. Thus, waiting time prior to radiotherapy becomes a major concern in many countries with reported delays of 70 days or even more.Clinicians involved in treating HNSCC face the problem of rapidly growing tumors but despite significant progress in the understanding of these tumors, their development and progression remain currently unpredictible at the time of diagnosis. In a retrospective trial, Laccourreye et al. studied the time of progression of symptoms and signs (TPSS) before diagnosis and treatment in 966 HNSCC cases and showed that for a given tumor stage, the longer was the TPSS, the better were the vital prognosis, the local and lymph node control. But there is no clear definition of fast growing tumor, with objective measurement.

A CT-scan is perfomed at the time of diagnosis. Several weeks later, a second CT-scan is necessary for treatment planning in order to define the tumoral target volume. This necessity provides the opportunity to compare tumoral volumes on both exams, and thus to assess tumoral progression. In a pilot study conducted with Institut Gustave Roussy, the investigators studied retrospectively the tumor and loco-regional progression in the waiting time between diagnostic and treatment planning CT-scans in a cohort of patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma, treated by radio(chemo)therapy between April 2005 and April 2007. The study demonstrated that 53% of the patients presented a tumoral progression of > 50% within a mean waiting time of 42.1 +/- 15.7 days. The investigators consider this situation as regrettable, and prospective trials are clearly needed to determine clinical consequences of these findings.

The current project aims to study prospectively the loco-regional tumoral progression within the waiting time between diagnostic and treatment planning CT-scans in a cohort of patients with OPSCC. Patients with oropharyngeal primary squamous cell carcinoma elected for radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy with curative intent will be selected. Tumor volume, number and size of pathological cervical lymph nodes (small diameter > 1 cm) will be assessed on diagnostic CT-scan (DiCT) and treatment planning CT-scan (RtCT) using the summation of areas technique (computerized delineation). Tumoral progression and tumor doubling time will be calculated based on DiCT and RtCT in order to define different tumoral kinetics patterns. Human papillomavirus (HPV) status will be assessed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and p16 immunohistochemistry. As primary objective, the investigators will study the tumoral kinetics patterns with disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with OPSCC in order to study their clinical signification [time frame: 5 years]. As secondary objectives, the investigators will correlate the tumoral kinetics patterns with HPV status of patients with OPSCC, and compare tumoural kinetics to proliferation markers (Ki67, mitotic index) in order to develop predictive markers of tumour progression for head and neck cancers. An other complementary objective will compare tumor kinetics patterns with endoscopic aspect (ulcerative versus exophytic)

Conditions

Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma; Tumor Growth

Study Design

• Observational Model Type: COHORT
• Study Time Perspective: PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Patients with T1 to T4 head and neck squamous cell carcinoma from oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx and hypopharynx eligible for radiotherapy or concomitant chemoradiotherapy

Tumor delineation

Intervention Type: OTHER

Measurement of tumor volume and neck nodes volume on a diagnostic CT and a pre-treatment CT by computerized delineation in order to calculate tumor growth velocity and tumor doubling time and describe tumoral kinetics patterns

Interventions

Tumor delineation

Measurement of tumor volume and neck nodes volume on a diagnostic CT and a pre-treatment CT by computerized delineation in order to calculate tumor growth velocity and tumor doubling time and describe tumoral kinetics patterns

Intervention Type: OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• clinical and anatomopathological diagnosis of a head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (T1 to T4) (oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx, hypopharynx)
• multidisciplinary decision for radiotherapy or concomitant radiochemotherapy eligibility

Exclusion Criteria

• metastatic disease
• primary surgical management
• contraindications to iodine contrast injection: anaphylaxis and renal insufficiency
• tumor not visible on CT

• Minimum Eligible Age: 18 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Sponsors

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire UCLouvain Namur

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Responsibility Role: SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Sebastien Van der Vorst, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

CHU Dinant Godinne

Locations

Clinique Ste-Elisabeth

Namur, , Belgium

CHU Dinant Godinne

Yvoir, , Belgium

Countries

Belgium

Central Contacts

Sebastien Van der Vorst, MD, PhD

Role: CONTACT

sebastien.vandervorst@uclouvain.be

+32 81 423726

Facility Contacts

Jean-Francois Daisne, MD,PhD

Role: primary

+32.81.720.757

Sebastien Vandervorst, MD,PhD

Role: primary

sebastien.vandervorst@uclouvain.be

+32 81 423726

References

Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2007. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007 Jan-Feb;57(1):43-66. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.57.1.43.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 17237035 (View on PubMed)

Waaijer A, Terhaard CH, Dehnad H, Hordijk GJ, van Leeuwen MS, Raaymakers CP, Lagendijk JJ. Waiting times for radiotherapy: consequences of volume increase for the TCP in oropharyngeal carcinoma. Radiother Oncol. 2003 Mar;66(3):271-6. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8140(03)00036-7.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 12742266 (View on PubMed)

Jensen AR, Nellemann HM, Overgaard J. Tumor progression in waiting time for radiotherapy in head and neck cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2007 Jul;84(1):5-10. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2007.04.001. Epub 2007 May 9.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 17493700 (View on PubMed)

Brouha XD, Op De Coul B, Terhaard CH, Hordijk GJ. Does waiting time for radiotherapy affect local control of T1N0M0 glottic laryngeal carcinoma? Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2000 Jun;25(3):215-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2273.2000.00347.x.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 10944052 (View on PubMed)

De Meerleer GO, Vakaet LA, De Gersem WR, De Wagter C, De Naeyer B, De Neve W. Radiotherapy of prostate cancer with or without intensity modulated beams: a planning comparison. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000 Jun 1;47(3):639-48. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(00)00419-3.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 10837946 (View on PubMed)

Mackillop WJ, Zhou Y, Quirt CF. A comparison of delays in the treatment of cancer with radiation in Canada and the United States. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995 May 15;32(2):531-9. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(94)00662-5.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 7751195 (View on PubMed)

O'Rourke N, Edwards R. Lung cancer treatment waiting times and tumour growth. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2000;12(3):141-4. doi: 10.1053/clon.2000.9139.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 10942328 (View on PubMed)

Primdahl H, Nielsen AL, Larsen S, Andersen E, Ipsen M, Lajer C, Vestermark LW, Andersen LJ, Hansen HS, Overgaard M, Overgaard J, Grau C; DAHANCA. Changes from 1992 to 2002 in the pretreatment delay for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of larynx or pharynx: a Danish nationwide survey from DAHANCA. Acta Oncol. 2006;45(2):156-61. doi: 10.1080/02841860500423948.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 16546860 (View on PubMed)

Robinson D, Massey T, Davies E, Jack RH, Sehgal A, Moller H. Waiting times for radiotherapy: variation over time and between cancer networks in southeast England. Br J Cancer. 2005 Apr 11;92(7):1201-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602463.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 15785752 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

TGV-PI01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id