Osteopathic Treatment for Chronic Low Back Pain

NCT ID: NCT02983435

Last Updated: 2018-09-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

10 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-12-31

Study Completion Date

2017-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The relevance of this study is to determine the efficacy of two osteopathic techniques - Thrust Technique and Muscle Energy Technique (MET) - in improving of neuromuscular component of the trunk and clinical symptoms in adult workers with Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP). Few studies have investigated and compared the physiological responses of these techniques quantitatively, and no published study has compared their effects in low back pain subjects in terms of symptoms, postural balance and muscle activation. The main outcomes will be computed by electromyography measurement so that to assess the trunk neuromuscular activation pattern as well as by force platform parameters for determining of postural control. Clinical symptoms such as pain intensity, perception of disability and fear and avoidance will also be computed.

This is the first study to compare these two osteopathic techniques using the main biological outcomes related to trunk neuromuscular function.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of two osteopathic techniques (Thrust and MET) on CLBP adult workers treatment.

A total of 15 male participants with chronic low back pain, volunteers, active workers aged from 35 to 55 years (in aging process) will be recruited by convenience from the community local. All participants will sign an informed consent form approved by the North of Parana University Ethics Committee for Research on Human Subjects. The intervention will follow the CONSORT recommendations for randomized controlled trials. All baseline testing and evaluation will be performed by a blinded evaluator to the study intervention. The sample will be randomized in two groups from crossover design: Group #1), which will receive the Thrust technique applied at the level of dysfunction; and Group #2, which will receive the Muscle Energy Technique, also applied at the level of dysfunction. The allocation will be printed in cards by sequentially numbered in opaque envelopes.

The treatment (intervention) will occur in 2 phases of 3 weeks each one. The participants will receive only one of techniques in each phase, and after one rest week (washout) they will receive the other technique (crossover), totaling 7 weeks. In this study, both techniques will be applied at the lumbar vertebral level that present the dysfunction which will be diagnosed in the specific evaluation, performed by two specialized physiotherapists in osteopathy. Before and after the manipulation (with Thrust or MET) all participants will be evaluated in 2 tasks - bipedal without load and bipedal with load (10% of body mass) - on the force platform. Parallel to the tasks, the recording of the measurements of EMG surface will be computed to determine the pattern of the trunk neuromuscular activation in amplitude of the RMS signal as well as muscle fatigue through the median frequency parameters.

Before performing the tasks on the force platform, a maximum voluntary isometric contraction will be performed for the back (paravertebral) and abdominal (rectus) muscles in order to normalize the signal EMG for determining of the level muscular activity during each task (with or without load). After the intervention, the immediate and final revaluations will include all the used measures in the initial evaluation, such as muscle activation of trunk (EMG), balance (force platform), and clinical symptoms of pain (Visual Analogue Scale and McGill Short Questionnaire), psychosomatic factors (Fear and Avoidance Believe Questionnaire) and disability (Roland Morris Questionnaire).

For the analysis a two-way ANOVA will be used for each dependent variable to compare the two groups (G1 versus G2) in both situations (pre and post-immediate, and after 15 days) in the clinical measurements, postural balance and EMG. The size effect also will be computed to determine the rate of the changes observed.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Low Back Pain Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

G1 - Thrust manipulation

G1 - Thrust manipulation is an osteopathic technique. The Group 1 (G1) will receive the Thrust technique applied at the level of dysfunction. Subject in lateral decubitus, with one lower limb extended and the other in flexion, to the level of the targeted vertebra; upper trunk rotated back until the same vertebra; at the end of the range of movement will be applied the high speed and low amplitude impulse (Thrust).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

G1 - Thrust manipulation

Intervention Type OTHER

Osteopathic manipulation with Thrust technique. The Group 1 (G1) will receive the Thrust technique applied at the level of dysfunction. Subject in lateral decubitus, with one lower limb extended and the other in flexion, to the level of the targeted vertebra; upper trunk rotated back until the same vertebra; at the end of the range of movement will be applied the high speed and low amplitude impulse (Thrust).

G2 - Muscle Energy

G2 - Muscle Energy is a manual therapy technique based in muscular contraction and stretching. The Group 2 (G2) will receive the Muscle Energy technique applied at the level of dysfunction. Subject in lateral decubitus, with the upper and lower trunk flexed until the target vertebra, and upper trunk rotated back to the level of the same vertebra; lumbar in lateral flexion (using the subject's feet) until the target vertebra. Following the command the subject will perform an isometric contraction of 3-5 seconds against the therapist's hand (pushing the hand towards the floor), repeated 3 times.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

G2 - Muscle Energy

Intervention Type OTHER

Osteopathic manipulation with Muscle Energy technique. The Group 2 (G2) will receive the Muscle Energy technique applied at the level of dysfunction. Subject in lateral decubitus, with the upper and lower trunk flexed until the target vertebra, and upper trunk rotated back to the level of the same vertebra; lumbar in lateral flexion (using the subject's feet) until the target vertebra. Following the command the subject will perform an isometric contraction of 3-5 seconds against the therapist's hand (pushing the hand towards the floor), repeated 3 times.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

G1 - Thrust manipulation

Osteopathic manipulation with Thrust technique. The Group 1 (G1) will receive the Thrust technique applied at the level of dysfunction. Subject in lateral decubitus, with one lower limb extended and the other in flexion, to the level of the targeted vertebra; upper trunk rotated back until the same vertebra; at the end of the range of movement will be applied the high speed and low amplitude impulse (Thrust).

Intervention Type OTHER

G2 - Muscle Energy

Osteopathic manipulation with Muscle Energy technique. The Group 2 (G2) will receive the Muscle Energy technique applied at the level of dysfunction. Subject in lateral decubitus, with the upper and lower trunk flexed until the target vertebra, and upper trunk rotated back to the level of the same vertebra; lumbar in lateral flexion (using the subject's feet) until the target vertebra. Following the command the subject will perform an isometric contraction of 3-5 seconds against the therapist's hand (pushing the hand towards the floor), repeated 3 times.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Chronic low back pain at least for three months.
* Low back pain of unknown mechanical origin without irradiation to the lower limbs.
* Workers with chronic low back pain at least three months.
* Do not be participating in rehabilitation programs.
* Do not have practiced regular physical activity in the past 3 months.

Exclusion Criteria

* Manual therapy treatment in the past 90 days.
* Discal herniation diagnosis.
* Lumbar radiculopathy and / or nerve root compression.
* Lumbar stenosis.
* Lumbar surgery.
* Nerve root entrapment.
* Neurological and endocrine.
* Osteoporosis.
* Rheumatoid arthritis.
* Spinal osteomyelitis.
* Spondylolysis.
* Spondylolisthesis.
* Tumors.
* Vertebral fracture.
* No current sports or treatment in Physiotherapy, Pilates Method or Manual Therapy.
Minimum Eligible Age

35 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

55 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universidade Norte do ParanĂ¡

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Rubens Alexandre da Silva Jr

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Rubens da Silva, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Laboratory of Functional Assessment and Human Motor Performance (LAFUP)

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Laboratory of Functional Assessment and Human Motor Performance (LAFUP)

Londrina, ParanĂ¡, Brazil

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Brazil

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Licciardone JC, Minotti DE, Gatchel RJ, Kearns CM, Singh KP. Osteopathic manual treatment and ultrasound therapy for chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Fam Med. 2013 Mar-Apr;11(2):122-9. doi: 10.1370/afm.1468.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23508598 (View on PubMed)

Haas M, Vavrek D, Peterson D, Polissar N, Neradilek MB. Dose-response and efficacy of spinal manipulation for care of chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Spine J. 2014 Jul 1;14(7):1106-16. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.07.468. Epub 2013 Oct 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24139233 (View on PubMed)

Wilder DG, Vining RD, Pohlman KA, Meeker WC, Xia T, Devocht JW, Gudavalli RM, Long CR, Owens EF, Goertz CM. Effect of spinal manipulation on sensorimotor functions in back pain patients: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2011 Jun 28;12:161. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-161.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21708042 (View on PubMed)

Cleland JA, Fritz JM, Childs JD, Kulig K. Comparison of the effectiveness of three manual physical therapy techniques in a subgroup of patients with low back pain who satisfy a clinical prediction rule: study protocol of a randomized clinical trial [NCT00257998]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006 Feb 10;7:11. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-7-11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16472379 (View on PubMed)

da Silva RA Jr, Arsenault AB, Gravel D, Lariviere C, de Oliveira E Jr. Back muscle strength and fatigue in healthy and chronic low back pain subjects: a comparative study of 3 assessment protocols. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Apr;86(4):722-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.08.007.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15827924 (View on PubMed)

Lariviere C, Gagnon D, Loisel P. The comparison of trunk muscles EMG activation between subjects with and without chronic low back pain during flexion-extension and lateral bending tasks. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2000 Apr;10(2):79-91. doi: 10.1016/s1050-6411(99)00027-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10699556 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

[email protected]

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Treating Chronic Cervicogenic Head and Neck Pain
NCT05617365 RECRUITING PHASE1/PHASE2