CBCT in Guiding Bronchoscopy in Patients With Lung Lesions
NCT ID: NCT02978170
Last Updated: 2019-06-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
21 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-11-28
2019-05-04
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
CBCT-Guided Navigational Bronchoscopy For Lung Nodules
NCT04758403
Feasibility of Mobile-CT-Assisted Bronchoscopy for the Diagnosis of Lung Lesion
NCT04995172
Cone Beam CT Guided Robotic Navigational Bronchoscopy
NCT05358041
Study Using Combined Virtual 4-D Electromagnetic (EM) Tip-Tracked Devices & EBUS in Diagnosis of Lung Nodules
NCT01947530
Percutaneous Lung Biopsy Using Cone Beam CT With Virtual Guidance: a Randomized Control Trial
NCT04299542
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
I. To describe the feasibility of using CBCT as an additional aid to guided-bronchoscopy with radial probe endobronchial ultrasound (RP-EBUS)/hybrid scope for the diagnosis of peripheral lung nodules.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. Describe the proportion of patients with peripheral nodules undergoing bronchoscopy in whom the lesion is identified by RP-EBUS (RP-EBUS-navigation yield) and confirmed with CBCT.
II. Describe the proportion of patients with peripheral nodules undergoing bronchoscopy in whom the lesion is identified by RP-EBUS and samples are diagnostic (diagnostic yield-RP-EBUS).
III. Describe the proportion of patients with peripheral nodules undergoing bronchoscopy in whom the lesion is identified by RP-EBUS, samples were non-diagnostic, and CBCT prompted further tool re-location (i.e. change of needle angle, change of tool) leading to diagnosis.
IV. Describe the proportion of patients with peripheral nodules undergoing bronchoscopy in whom the lesion is not identified by RP-EBUS, and CBCT-aided navigation allowed the operator to reach the lesion (CBCT-added navigation yield).
V. Describe the proportion of patients with peripheral nodules undergoing bronchoscopy in whom the lesion is not identified by RP-EBUS and CBCT-aided navigation allowed the operator to reach the lesion and obtain a diagnosis (CBCT-added diagnostic yield).
VI. Describe the relationship between RP-PROBE and target (contact/no contact; central/peripheral).
VII. Describe the relationship between needle tip and target (contact/no contact; central/peripheral).
VIII. Describe the influence of points 6 and 7 on diagnostic yield. IX. Describe fluoroscopy time. X. Describe estimated amount of radiation generated by CBCT use. XI. Describe bronchoscopy time (first scope in/last scope out). XII. Describe the proportion of patients in whom molecular analysis for lung cancer (i.e. EGFR, K-RAS, ALK) can be performed.
OUTLINE:
Patients undergo CBCT during standard of care bronchoscopy.
After completion of study, patients with lesions found not to be cancerous are followed up for 6 months to watch for changes (standard care).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Diagnostic (CBCT)
Patients undergo CBCT during standard of care bronchoscopy.
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
Undergo CBCT
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
Undergo CBCT
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient with indications for mediastinal lymph node (LN) sampling per 13th American College of Clinical Pharmacy (ACCP) guidelines
* Patient with metastatic disease (from primaries other than lung) who have suspicious mediastinal or hilar LN that require sampling
* Patients with contraindication/s for general anesthesia (e.g., severe and active coronary artery disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease \[COPD\] with forced expiratory volume in 1 second \[FEV1\] \< 1 liter, uncontrolled hypertension, increased intracranial pressure, history of intolerance to general anesthesia)
* Dementia or other severe cognitive impairment causing inability to understand or consent to the procedure and study
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
NIH
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Roberto Casal, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
M D Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Casal RF, Sarkiss M, Jones AK, Stewart J, Tam A, Grosu HB, Ost DE, Jimenez CA, Eapen GA. Cone beam computed tomography-guided thin/ultrathin bronchoscopy for diagnosis of peripheral lung nodules: a prospective pilot study. J Thorac Dis. 2018 Dec;10(12):6950-6959. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.11.21.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
MD Anderson Cancer Center Website
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NCI-2017-00628
Identifier Type: REGISTRY
Identifier Source: secondary_id
2016-0466
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
2016-0466
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.