Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
25 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-10-08
2025-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
• What is the concordance between CBCT navigation success (tool-in-lesion on CBCT spin) and nCLE tool-in-lesion confirmation (tool-in-lesion nCLE criteria observed).
Participants scheduled to undergo a diagnostic conebeam navigation bronchoscopy will be included in the study. nCLE imaging at the tip of the TBNA needle will be added to the procedure for study purposes.
Two needle punctures of the pulmonary nodule will be followed by nCLE imaging directly followed by a tool-in-lesion CBCT spin in order to compare nCLE results with CBCT results.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
nCLE For Diagnosis Of Peripheral Lung Nodules By Robotic Navigational Bronchoscopy
NCT04441749
Cone Beam CT Guided Robotic Navigational Bronchoscopy
NCT05358041
Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy VERification
NCT06079970
Added Value of Cone Beam CT Guidance to Electromagnetic Navigation Bronchoscopy for the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Nodule.
NCT05257382
Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy in Pleural Malignancies
NCT03290183
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Diagnostic bronchoscopy for peripheral lung nodules remains challenging despite many tech-nological innovations. The procedure comprises three essential pillars needed for a diagnos-tic success: navigation to the lesion, tool-in-lesion confirmation and adequate tissue retrieval.
Cone beam computed tomography navigation bronchoscopy (CBCT-NB) is a fairly new tech-nique that provides coarse navigation to the pulmonary lesion with real-time guidance using augmented fluoroscopy (AF). An initial CBCT scan allows for segmentation of the target le-sion and selecting the optimal pathway. Repeated CBCT scanning allows for confirmation that the target has been reached (navigation success) or if repositioning is needed.
Although the technique is very promising, an often discussed disadvantage of CBCT is the inherent use of ionizing radiation, limited availability and challenges with small nodules lo-cated in the basal and posterior fields due to respiratory motion. Most procedures ask for multiple CBCT spins both for trajectory planning, tool adjustments and tool-in-lesion confir-mation. This, combined with extensive use of fluoroscopy is associated with radiation expo-sure for both patients and the investigation team. Additionally, CBCT-NB with AF provides information from a global perspective rather than a local perspective. In experienced centers, coarse navigation guidance seems of lesser concern and fine positioning and optimal tissue sampling are the biggest problems to be overcome. The persistently low diagnostic yield of navigation bronchoscopies can for the majority be attributed mispositioning of the tools in "the last centimeter". Therefore there is a need for complementary techniques providing real-time information for fine-tuning the needle position such as needle-based confocal laser en-domicroscopy (nCLE) also called the "smart needle".
Confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) is a high-resolution microscopic technique that visual-izes individual cells in real-time at the tip of the biopsy needle, allowing for real-time micro-scopic feedback for fine tuning needle positioning and tool-in-lesion confirmation. Currently, it is unknown which (combination of) techniques are the most optimal (i.e., leading to a high di-agnostic yield and cost-effective). Therefore, research is needed to investigate the potential of new (combinations of) techniques. To date, there are no reports on the combination of CBCT-NB with nCLE.
Objective: This study aims to investigate proof of principle of utilizing nCLE during CBCT-NB navigation bronchoscopy. A confirmatory CBCT spin is considered the gold standard for tool-in-lesion but is associated with additional radiation exposure. The aim is to investigate the concordance between CBCT navigation success (tool-in-lesion on CBCT spin) and nCLE tool-in-lesion confirmation (tool-in-lesion nCLE criteria observed). The investigators also hypothesize that nCLE could reduce or replace the need for additional confirmatory CBCT scans and limit fluoroscopy use.
Study design: Investigator-initiated proof of principle medical device study
Study population: Patients (18 years and older) with (suspected) pulmonary nodules with an indication for cone-beam computed tomography navigation bronchoscopy.
Procedure: Cone beam computed tomography navigation bronchoscopy combined with needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy.
Main study parameters/endpoints:
* CBCT-NB navigation success as either tool-in-lesion OR unsuccessful
* nCLE tool-in-lesion confirmation, defined as tool-in-lesion nCLE criteria observed
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
nCLE + CBCT-NB
Patients with a suspected malignant peripheral pulmonary nodule(s) referred for cone beam ct navigation bronchoscopy for tissue sampling.
needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy
needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy at the tip of the TBNA needle for two punctures, combined with confirmatory CBCT spin for tool-in-lesion confirmation
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy
needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy at the tip of the TBNA needle for two punctures, combined with confirmatory CBCT spin for tool-in-lesion confirmation
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Suspected pulmonary nodule with an indication for CBCT-NB (decided by multidisciplinary tumour board)
* Nodule must be solid or partially solid
* Solid part of the nodule must be at least 8 mm
* Largest dimension of the nodule on CT equal or less than 30 mm
* Ability to understand and willingness to sign a written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with an endobronchial visible lung tumor on bronchoscopic inspection
* Patients in which the target lesion is within reach of the linear EBUS scope
* Lung nodules that resolved at the time of index intraprocedural CBCT
* Failure to comply with the study protocol
* Patients with known allergy for fluorescein or risk factors for an allergic reaction
* Pregnant or breastfeeding women
* Patients with hemodynamic instability
* Patients with refractory hypoxemia
* Patients with a therapeutic anticoagulant that cannot be held for an appropriate in-terval before the procedure
* Patients who are unable to tolerate general anesthesia according to the anesthesiologist
* Patient undergoing chemotherapy as several chemotherapies have fluorescent properties at the same wavelength (e.g. doxorubicin)
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Prof. J.T. Annema, MD, PhD
Prof. dr. Jouke Annema
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jouke Annema, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Amsterdam UMC
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Amsterdam UMC
Amsterdam, , Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Saskia van Heumen, MSc
Role: backup
Jouke Annema, MD, PhD
Role: backup
Johannes Daniels, MD, PhD
Role: backup
Peter Bonta, MD, PhD
Role: backup
Marjolein Heuvelmans, MD, PhD
Role: backup
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NL86502.018.24
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.