NCLE-Cone-beam CT Navigation Bronchoscopy

NCT ID: NCT06505642

Last Updated: 2024-11-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

25 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-10-08

Study Completion Date

2025-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this proof of principle observational study is to investigate in patients with suspected peripheral pulmonary nodules. The main question it aims to answer is:

• What is the concordance between CBCT navigation success (tool-in-lesion on CBCT spin) and nCLE tool-in-lesion confirmation (tool-in-lesion nCLE criteria observed).

Participants scheduled to undergo a diagnostic conebeam navigation bronchoscopy will be included in the study. nCLE imaging at the tip of the TBNA needle will be added to the procedure for study purposes.

Two needle punctures of the pulmonary nodule will be followed by nCLE imaging directly followed by a tool-in-lesion CBCT spin in order to compare nCLE results with CBCT results.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Lung cancer remains a significant problem in current society with one of the higher cancer related mortality rates. The increased use of chest computed tomography (CT) and the po-tential future lung cancer screening result in an increased detection of early-stage peripheral lung cancer. Bronchoscopies are often indicated to collect tissue for diagnosis and to aid treatment decision making.

Diagnostic bronchoscopy for peripheral lung nodules remains challenging despite many tech-nological innovations. The procedure comprises three essential pillars needed for a diagnos-tic success: navigation to the lesion, tool-in-lesion confirmation and adequate tissue retrieval.

Cone beam computed tomography navigation bronchoscopy (CBCT-NB) is a fairly new tech-nique that provides coarse navigation to the pulmonary lesion with real-time guidance using augmented fluoroscopy (AF). An initial CBCT scan allows for segmentation of the target le-sion and selecting the optimal pathway. Repeated CBCT scanning allows for confirmation that the target has been reached (navigation success) or if repositioning is needed.

Although the technique is very promising, an often discussed disadvantage of CBCT is the inherent use of ionizing radiation, limited availability and challenges with small nodules lo-cated in the basal and posterior fields due to respiratory motion. Most procedures ask for multiple CBCT spins both for trajectory planning, tool adjustments and tool-in-lesion confir-mation. This, combined with extensive use of fluoroscopy is associated with radiation expo-sure for both patients and the investigation team. Additionally, CBCT-NB with AF provides information from a global perspective rather than a local perspective. In experienced centers, coarse navigation guidance seems of lesser concern and fine positioning and optimal tissue sampling are the biggest problems to be overcome. The persistently low diagnostic yield of navigation bronchoscopies can for the majority be attributed mispositioning of the tools in "the last centimeter". Therefore there is a need for complementary techniques providing real-time information for fine-tuning the needle position such as needle-based confocal laser en-domicroscopy (nCLE) also called the "smart needle".

Confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) is a high-resolution microscopic technique that visual-izes individual cells in real-time at the tip of the biopsy needle, allowing for real-time micro-scopic feedback for fine tuning needle positioning and tool-in-lesion confirmation. Currently, it is unknown which (combination of) techniques are the most optimal (i.e., leading to a high di-agnostic yield and cost-effective). Therefore, research is needed to investigate the potential of new (combinations of) techniques. To date, there are no reports on the combination of CBCT-NB with nCLE.

Objective: This study aims to investigate proof of principle of utilizing nCLE during CBCT-NB navigation bronchoscopy. A confirmatory CBCT spin is considered the gold standard for tool-in-lesion but is associated with additional radiation exposure. The aim is to investigate the concordance between CBCT navigation success (tool-in-lesion on CBCT spin) and nCLE tool-in-lesion confirmation (tool-in-lesion nCLE criteria observed). The investigators also hypothesize that nCLE could reduce or replace the need for additional confirmatory CBCT scans and limit fluoroscopy use.

Study design: Investigator-initiated proof of principle medical device study

Study population: Patients (18 years and older) with (suspected) pulmonary nodules with an indication for cone-beam computed tomography navigation bronchoscopy.

Procedure: Cone beam computed tomography navigation bronchoscopy combined with needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy.

Main study parameters/endpoints:

* CBCT-NB navigation success as either tool-in-lesion OR unsuccessful
* nCLE tool-in-lesion confirmation, defined as tool-in-lesion nCLE criteria observed

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lung Neoplasm Peripheral Lung Parenchyma Tumor Lung Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

nCLE + CBCT-NB

Patients with a suspected malignant peripheral pulmonary nodule(s) referred for cone beam ct navigation bronchoscopy for tissue sampling.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy

Intervention Type DEVICE

needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy at the tip of the TBNA needle for two punctures, combined with confirmatory CBCT spin for tool-in-lesion confirmation

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy

needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy at the tip of the TBNA needle for two punctures, combined with confirmatory CBCT spin for tool-in-lesion confirmation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

cone beam computed tomography navigation bronchoscopy

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 18 years or older
* Suspected pulmonary nodule with an indication for CBCT-NB (decided by multidisciplinary tumour board)
* Nodule must be solid or partially solid
* Solid part of the nodule must be at least 8 mm
* Largest dimension of the nodule on CT equal or less than 30 mm
* Ability to understand and willingness to sign a written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Inability or non-willingness to provide informed consent
* Patients with an endobronchial visible lung tumor on bronchoscopic inspection
* Patients in which the target lesion is within reach of the linear EBUS scope
* Lung nodules that resolved at the time of index intraprocedural CBCT
* Failure to comply with the study protocol
* Patients with known allergy for fluorescein or risk factors for an allergic reaction
* Pregnant or breastfeeding women
* Patients with hemodynamic instability
* Patients with refractory hypoxemia
* Patients with a therapeutic anticoagulant that cannot be held for an appropriate in-terval before the procedure
* Patients who are unable to tolerate general anesthesia according to the anesthesiologist
* Patient undergoing chemotherapy as several chemotherapies have fluorescent properties at the same wavelength (e.g. doxorubicin)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Prof. J.T. Annema, MD, PhD

Prof. dr. Jouke Annema

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jouke Annema, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Amsterdam UMC

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Amsterdam UMC

Amsterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Jouke Annema, MD, PhD

Role: CONTACT

+31(0)20 566 2694

Saskia van Heumen, MSc

Role: CONTACT

+31(0)20 566 2694

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Saskia van Heumen, MSc

Role: primary

+31(0)20 566 2694

Saskia van Heumen, MSc

Role: backup

Jouke Annema, MD, PhD

Role: backup

Johannes Daniels, MD, PhD

Role: backup

Peter Bonta, MD, PhD

Role: backup

Marjolein Heuvelmans, MD, PhD

Role: backup

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NL86502.018.24

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.