The Bioresorbable Implants for Scaffolding Obstructions in Randomized Bifurcations (BIFSORB) Study

NCT ID: NCT02973529

Last Updated: 2026-01-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-01-31

Study Completion Date

2028-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Coronary artery disease is often treated by implantation of permanent metallic stents.Coronary stents are required in the early healing phase after balloon dilatation but constitute a lifelong foreign body. New bioresorbable stents have been developed and are believed to improve long-term safety. The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and vessel healing after treatment of simple bifurcation lesions with the CE-marked bioresorbable stents Absorb and Desolve.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

BIFSORB is a prospective, randomized multicenter trial comparing 6-month healing outcome after treatment of simple coronary bifurcation lesions by Absorb or Desolve BRS. for treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions.

BRS are promising in treatment of coronary artery disease. The concept of bifurcation treatment using BRS is particular appealing as struts covering the side branch ostium may resorb over time.

The aim of this study is to compare the 6 months safety and vessel healing after treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions by the Desolve or Absorb BRS.

Hypothesis: Treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions using Absorb and Desolve bioresorbable stents is safe. Treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions by Desolve BRS is associated with a lower index of adverse vessel wall features (main vessel area stenosis, acquired malapposition, evaginations, late recoil, single end attached protruding struts, side branch ostial area stenosis) at 6 months compared to treatment with Absorb BRS.

Methods:

Prospective, open label, single blind, randomized, feasibility and safety pilot study with inclusion of 120 patients. Randomization 1:1 to Absorb or Desolve. Planned 6- and 24-month follow-up by OCT and follow-up for clinical endpoints until 10 years.

Eligible patients with a bifurcation lesion are treated by the provisional technique with mandatory jailing of the side branch and provisional opening of side branch ostium by the mini-kiss technique in case of severe pinching or TIMI-flow less than III. Proximal post-dilatation is mandatory. No dilatation beyond the expansion limits of the BRS.

The patients are assessed by optical coherence tomography (OCT) before, during and after implantation of the Absorb or Desolve BRS at baseline procedure and again at 6- and 24-month follow-up, or before if they are readmitted with a possible target lesion failure.

The operator is not blinded to pre-PCI OCT images that may be used for sizing and positioning of the scaffolds. Procedural OCT may be used to optimize scaffold implantation before performing final OCT.

Results are reported as clinical safety at 6 months (myocardial infarction, revascularization, death) and stent healing index by OCT including malapposition, stent coverage, side branch ostial area late loss, fracture and evaginations.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Coronary Artery Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Absorb

Randomization to implantation of Absorb BVS in bifurcation lesion

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Absorb

Intervention Type DEVICE

Randomization to implantation of Absorb BVS in bifurcation lesion

Desolve

Randomization to implantation of Desolve BRS in bifurcation lesion

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Desolve

Intervention Type DEVICE

Randomization to implantation of Desolve BRS in bifurcation lesion

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Absorb

Randomization to implantation of Absorb BVS in bifurcation lesion

Intervention Type DEVICE

Desolve

Randomization to implantation of Desolve BRS in bifurcation lesion

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Stable angina pectoris
* Age \> 18 years
* Stabilized non-ST elevation myocardial infarction
* Silent angina
* De novo coronary bifurcation lesions at LAD/diagonal, CX/obtuse marginal, RCA-PDA/posterolateral branch
* All Medina classes except Medina x.x.1
* Diameter of side branch ≥ 2.5 mm
* Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* ST-elevation infarction within 48 hours
* Expected survival \< 1 year
* Severe heart failure (NYHA≥III)
* S-creatinine \> 120 µmol/L
* Allergy to contrast media, aspirin, clopidogrel, ticagrelor, ticlopidine, everolimus or novolimus
* Unable to cover main vessel lesion with one scaffold
* Severe tortuosity
* Severe calcification
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Aarhus University Hospital Skejby

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Evald Hoej Christiansen

Principal investigator (MD, PhD)

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Evald H Christiansen, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Aarhus University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Aarhus University Hospital

Aarhus N, , Denmark

Site Status

Odense University Hospital

Odense, , Denmark

Site Status

Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde

Roskilde, , Denmark

Site Status

Latvian Heart Center

Riga, , Latvia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark Latvia

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1-10-72-215-14

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

BioFreedom™ BA9™ Ultra
NCT05331547 UNKNOWN
ReZolve2 Clinical Investigation
NCT01845311 COMPLETED NA
DES Versus BiOSS LIM - POLBOS II Study
NCT02198300 COMPLETED PHASE4