A Study of Acalabrutinib vs Investigator's Choice of Idelalisib Plus Rituximab or Bendamustine Plus Rituximab in R/R CLL

NCT ID: NCT02970318

Last Updated: 2026-02-06

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

310 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-02-02

Study Completion Date

2027-10-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is designed to evaluate the efficacy of acalabrutinib compared with rituximab in combination with idelalisib or bendamustine in previously treated subjects with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Acalabrutinib (ACP-196)

Acalabrutinib (ACP-196) Monotherapy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Acalabrutinib (ACP-196)

Intervention Type DRUG

Acalabrutinib monotherapy

Rituximab Plus Idelalisib or Bendamustine

Investigator's Choice of Rituximab Plus Idelalisib or Bendamustine

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Rituximab

Intervention Type DRUG

Rituximab in combination with idelalisib or bendamustine

Idelalisib

Intervention Type DRUG

Idelalisib in combination with rituximab

Bendamustine

Intervention Type DRUG

Bendamustine in combination with rituximab

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Rituximab

Rituximab in combination with idelalisib or bendamustine

Intervention Type DRUG

Idelalisib

Idelalisib in combination with rituximab

Intervention Type DRUG

Bendamustine

Bendamustine in combination with rituximab

Intervention Type DRUG

Acalabrutinib (ACP-196)

Acalabrutinib monotherapy

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Men and women ≥ 18 years of age.
2. ECOG performance status of 0 to 2.
3. Diagnosis of CLL that meets published diagnostic criteria (Hallek 2008):

1. Monoclonal B-cells (either kappa or lambda light chain restricted) that are clonally co-expressing ≥ 1 B-cell marker (CD19, CD20, or CD23) and CD5.
2. Prolymphocytes may comprise ≤ 55% of blood lymphocytes.
3. Presence of ≥ 5 x 10\^9 B lymphocytes/L (5000/μL) in the peripheral blood (at any point since initial diagnosis).
4. Must have documented CD20-positive CLL.
5. Active disease meeting ≥ 1 of the following IWCLL 2008 criteria for requiring treatment:

1. Evidence of progressive marrow failure as manifested by the development of, or worsening of, anemia (hemoglobin \< 10 g/dL) and/or thrombocytopenia (platelets \< 100,000/μL).
2. Massive (i.e., ≥ 6 cm below the left costal margin), progressive, or symptomatic splenomegaly.
3. Massive nodes (i.e., ≥ 10 cm in the longest diameter), progressive, or symptomatic lymphadenopathy.
4. Progressive lymphocytosis with an increase of \> 50% over a 2-month period or a LDT of \< 6 months. LDT may be obtained by linear regression extrapolation of ALC obtained at intervals of 2 weeks over an observation period of 2 to 3 months. In subjects with initial blood lymphocyte counts of \< 30 x 10\^9/L (30,000/μL), LDT should not be used as a single parameter to define indication for treatment. In addition, factors contributing to lymphocytosis or lymphadenopathy other than CLL (e.g., infections) should be excluded.
5. Autoimmune anemia and/or thrombocytopenia that is poorly responsive to standard therapy.
6. Constitutional symptoms documented in the subject's chart with supportive objective measures, as appropriate, defined as ≥ 1 of the following disease-related symptoms or signs:

i. Unintentional weight loss ≥ 10% within the previous 6 months before screening.

ii. Significant fatigue (ECOG performance score 2; inability to work or perform usual activities).

iii. Fevers higher than 100.5°F or 38.0°C for ≥ 2 weeks before screening without evidence of infection.

iv. Night sweats for \> 1 month before screening without evidence of infection.
6. Meet the following laboratory parameters:

1. ANC ≥ 750 cells/μL (0.75 x 10\^9/L), or ≥ 500 cells/μL (0.50 x 10\^9/L) in subjects with documented bone marrow involvement, and independent of growth factor support 7 days before assessment.
2. Platelet count ≥ 50,000 cells/μL (50 x 10\^9/L), or ≥ 30,000 cells/μL (30 x 10\^9/L) in subjects with documented bone marrow involvement, and without transfusion support 7 days before assessment. Subjects with transfusion-dependent thrombocytopenia are excluded. If an Investigator has chosen bendamustine/rituximab as the Arm B treatment, platelets must be ≥ 75,000 cells/μL (75 x 10\^9/L).
3. Serum AST and ALT ≤ 2.0 x ULN.
4. Total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 x ULN.
5. Estimated creatinine clearance of ≥ 30 mL/min, calculated using the formula of Cockcroft and Gault \[(140-Age) • Mass (kg)/(72 • creatinine mg/dL); multiply by 0.85 if female\].
7. Must have received ≥ 1 prior systemic therapies for CLL. Note: Single-agent steroids or localized radiation are not considered a prior line of therapy. If a single-agent anti-CD20 antibody was previously administered, subjects must have received ≥ 2 doses.
8. Women who are sexually active and can bear children must agree to use highly effective forms of contraception while on the study and for 2 days after the last dose of acalabrutinib, 90 days after the last dose of idelalisib, 6 months after the last dose of bendamustine, or 12 months after the last dose of rituximab, whichever is longer. Highly effective forms of contraception are defined in Section 9.2.5.
9. Men who are sexually active and can beget children must agree to use highly effective forms of contraception during the study and for 90 days after the last dose of idelalisib, 6 months after the last dose of bendamustine, or 12 months after the last dose of rituximab, whichever is longer. Highly effective forms of contraception are defined in Section 9.2.5.
10. Men must agree to refrain from sperm donation during the study and for 90 days after the last dose of idelalisib, 6 months after the last dose of bendamustine, or 12 months after the last dose of rituximab, whichever is longer.
11. Willing and able to participate in all required evaluations and procedures in this study protocol, including swallowing capsules without difficulty.
12. Ability to understand the purpose and risks of the study and provide signed and dated informed consent and authorization to use protected health information (in accordance with national and local patient privacy regulations).

Exclusion Criteria

1. Known CNS lymphoma or leukemia.
2. Known prolymphocytic leukemia or history of, or currently suspected, Richter's syndrome.
3. Uncontrolled AIHA or ITP defined as declining hemoglobin or platelet count secondary to autoimmune destruction within the screening period or requirement for high doses of steroids (\> 20 mg daily of prednisone or equivalent).
4. Prior exposure to a BCL-2 inhibitor (e.g., venetoclax/ABT-199) or a BCR inhibitor (e.g., BTK inhibitors or PI3K inhibitors). Prior bendamustine is allowed if Investigator's choice for treatment in Arm B is idelalisib with rituximab. Bendamustine retreatment is allowed if the prior response to bendamustine lasted \> 24 months.
5. Received any chemotherapy, external beam radiation therapy, anticancer antibodies, or investigational drug within 30 days before first dose of study drug.
6. Corticosteroid use \> 20 mg daily prednisone equivalent within 1 week before first dose of study drug, except as indicated for other medical conditions such as inhaled steroid for asthma, topical steroid use, or as premedication for administration of study drug or contrast. For example, subjects requiring steroids at daily doses \> 20 mg prednisone equivalent systemic exposure daily, or those who are administered steroids for leukemia control or white blood cell count lowering are excluded.
7. Prior radio- or toxin-conjugated antibody therapy.
8. Prior allogeneic stem cell transplant or prior autologous transplant within 6 months of first dose of study drug(s) or presence of graft-vs-host disease or receiving treatment for graft-vs-host disease.
9. Major surgical procedure within 30 days of first dose of study drug. Note: If a subject had major surgery, they must have recovered adequately from any toxicity and/or complications from the intervention before the first dose of study drug.
10. History of prior malignancy except for the following:

1. Malignancy treated with curative intent and with no evidence of active disease present for more than 2 years before screening and felt to be at low risk for recurrence by treating physician.
2. Adequately treated lentigo maligna melanoma without current evidence of disease or adequately controlled nonmelanomatous skin cancer.
3. Adequately treated carcinoma in situ without current evidence of disease.
11. Significant cardiovascular disease such as uncontrolled or untreated symptomatic arrhythmias, congestive heart failure, or myocardial infarction within 6 months of screening, or any Class 3 or 4 cardiac disease as defined by the New York Heart Association Functional Classification, or QTc \> 480 msec (calculated using Fridericia's formula: QT/RR\^0.33) at screening. Exception: Subjects with controlled, asymptomatic atrial fibrillation during screening are allowed to enroll on study.
12. Malabsorption syndrome, disease significantly affecting gastrointestinal function, or resection of the stomach, or extensive small bowel resection that is likely to affect absorption, symptomatic inflammatory bowel disease, or partial or complete bowel obstruction, or gastric restrictions and bariatric surgery, such as gastric bypass.
13. Received a live virus vaccination within 28 days of first dose of study drug.
14. Known history of infection with HIV or any uncontrolled active systemic infection (e.g., bacterial, viral, or fungal). For study sites in Germany: active infection with human immunodeficiency virus (seropositivity for HIV-1 or HIV-2 antibodies, and if positive, reactivity against the HIV-specific p24 antigen).
15. Active CMV infection (active viremia as evidenced by positive polymerase chain reaction \[PCR\] result for CMV DNA).
16. Serologic status reflecting active hepatitis B or C infection.

1. Subjects who are anti-HBc positive and who are surface antigen negative will need to have a negative PCR result before randomization. Those who are HbsAg-positive or hepatitis B PCR positive will be excluded.
2. Subjects who are hepatitis C antibody positive will need to have a negative PCR result before randomization. Those who are hepatitis C PCR positive will be excluded.
17. Ongoing, drug-induced liver injury, alcoholic liver disease, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, primary biliary cirrhosis, ongoing extrahepatic obstruction caused by cholelithiasis, cirrhosis of the liver, or portal hypertension.
18. History of or ongoing drug-induced pneumonitis.
19. History of serious allergic reactions including anaphylaxis and toxic epidermal necrolysis.
20. History of stroke or intracranial hemorrhage within 6 months before first dose of study drug.
21. History of bleeding diathesis (e.g., hemophilia, von Willebrand disease).
22. Requires or receiving anticoagulation with warfarin or equivalent vitamin K antagonists (e.g., phenprocoumon) within 7 days of first dose of study drug.
23. Presence of a gastrointestinal ulcer diagnosed by endoscopy within 3 months before screening.
24. Requires treatment with a strong CYP3A inhibitor/inducer.
25. Requires treatment with proton-pump inhibitors (e.g., omeprazole, esomeprazole, lansoprazole, dexlansoprazole, rabeprazole, or pantoprazole). Subjects receiving proton-pump inhibitors who switch to H2-receptor antagonists or antacids are eligible for enrollment to this study.
26. Breast feeding or pregnant.
27. Concurrent participation in another therapeutic clinical trial.
28. Prothrombin time/INR or aPTT (in the absence of a Lupus anticoagulant) \> 2.0 x ULN. Exception: Subjects receiving warfarin are excluded, however, those receiving other anticoagulant therapy who have a higher INR/aPTT may be permitted to enroll to this study after discussion with the medical monitor.
29. History of confirmed progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Acerta Pharma BV

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Acerta Clinical Trials

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

1-888-292-9613; [email protected]

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Research Site

Brick, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Nyack, New York, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Canton, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Fort Sam Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Round Rock, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Adelaide, , Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Box Hill, , Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Frankston, , Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Geelong, , Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Gosford, , Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Hobart, , Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Kogarah, , Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Murdoch, , Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Nedlands, , Australia

Site Status

Research Site

South Brisbane, , Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Woodville, , Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Linz, , Austria

Site Status

Research Site

Salzburg, , Austria

Site Status

Research Site

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Research Site

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Research Site

Wels, , Austria

Site Status

Research Site

Antwerp, , Belgium

Site Status

Research Site

Ghent, , Belgium

Site Status

Research Site

Roeselare, , Belgium

Site Status

Research Site

Yvoir, , Belgium

Site Status

Research Site

Pleven, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Research Site

Plovdiv, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Research Site

Stara Zagora, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Research Site

Vratsa, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Research Site

Barrie, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Calgary, , Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Montreal, , Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Ottawa, , Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Regina, , Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Saint John, , Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Toronto, , Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Toronto, , Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Zadar, , Croatia

Site Status

Research Site

Zagreb, , Croatia

Site Status

Research Site

Brno, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Nový Hradec Králové, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Olomouc, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Ostrava Poruba, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Plzen - Lochotin, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Brest, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Nantes, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Paris, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Paris, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Perpignan, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Provence Alpes Cote D'Azur, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Rennes, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Rouen, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Aschaffenburg, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Dresden, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Mutlangen, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

München, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Ulm, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Hong Kong, , Hong Kong

Site Status

Research Site

Pok Fu Lam, , Hong Kong

Site Status

Research Site

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Debrecen, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Gyula, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Kaposvár, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Ashkelon, , Israel

Site Status

Research Site

Haifa, , Israel

Site Status

Research Site

Jerusalem, , Israel

Site Status

Research Site

Kfar Saba, , Israel

Site Status

Research Site

Nahariya, , Israel

Site Status

Research Site

Petah Tikvah, , Israel

Site Status

Research Site

Aviano, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Bergamo, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Brescia, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Florence, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Genova, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Genova, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Meldola, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Modena, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Addington, , New Zealand

Site Status

Research Site

Dunedin, , New Zealand

Site Status

Research Site

Palmerston North, , New Zealand

Site Status

Research Site

Tauranga, , New Zealand

Site Status

Research Site

Bialystok, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Bydgoszcz, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Gdansk, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Lodz, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Lublin, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Woj. Podkarpackie, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Novosibirsk, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Obninsk, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Penza, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Ryazan, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Sochi, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Tula, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Volgograd, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Yaroslavl, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Yekaterinburg, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

SGP, , Singapore

Site Status

Research Site

SGP, , Singapore

Site Status

Research Site

SGP, , Singapore

Site Status

Research Site

Bratislava, , Slovakia

Site Status

Research Site

Košice, , Slovakia

Site Status

Research Site

Busan, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Daegu, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Donggu, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Gyeonggi-do, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Incheon, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Jeonju, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Badalona, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Majadahonda, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Salamanca, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Santander, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Valencia, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Gothenburg, , Sweden

Site Status

Research Site

Luleå, , Sweden

Site Status

Research Site

Stockholm, , Sweden

Site Status

Research Site

Hualien City, , Taiwan

Site Status

Research Site

Tainan, , Taiwan

Site Status

Research Site

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

Research Site

Cherkasy, , Ukraine

Site Status

Research Site

Dnipropetrovsk, , Ukraine

Site Status

Research Site

Ivano-Frankivsk, , Ukraine

Site Status

Research Site

Khmelnytsky, , Ukraine

Site Status

Research Site

Kyiv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Research Site

Kyiv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Research Site

Zhytomyr, , Ukraine

Site Status

Research Site

Birmingham, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

Cambridge, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

Canterbury, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

Leicester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

Maidstone, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

Manchester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

Southampton, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

Wolverhampton, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

Chandler, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Oxnard, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Athens, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Joliet, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Cedar Rapids, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Mount Sterling, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Saint Cloud, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Lincoln, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Austria Belgium Bulgaria Canada Croatia Czechia France Germany Hong Kong Hungary Israel Italy New Zealand Poland Russia Singapore Slovakia South Korea Spain Sweden Taiwan Ukraine United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Eek D, Ivanescu C, Corredoira L, Meyers O, Cella D. Content validity and psychometric evaluation of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue scale in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2021 Mar 11;5(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s41687-021-00294-1.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33709202 (View on PubMed)

Ghia P, Pluta A, Wach M, Lysak D, Kozak T, Simkovic M, Kaplan P, Kraychok I, Illes A, de la Serna J, Dolan S, Campbell P, Musuraca G, Jacob A, Avery E, Lee JH, Liang W, Patel P, Quah C, Jurczak W. ASCEND: Phase III, Randomized Trial of Acalabrutinib Versus Idelalisib Plus Rituximab or Bendamustine Plus Rituximab in Relapsed or Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Sep 1;38(25):2849-2861. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.03355. Epub 2020 May 27.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32459600 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2015-004454-17

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

ACE-CL-309

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.