Acalabrutinib, Obinutuzumab and Chlorambucil in Treatment naïve CLL

NCT ID: NCT02475681

Last Updated: 2025-08-27

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

535 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-06-26

Study Completion Date

2025-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This Primary objective is evaluating the efficacy of obinutuzumab in combination with chlorambucil (Arm A) compared with acalabrutinib in combination with obinutuzumab (Arm B) for the treatment of previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Secondary objectives: 1) To evaluate the efficacy of obinutuzumab in combination with chlorambucil (Arm A) versus acalabrutinib monotherapy (Arm C) based on IRC assessment of PFS per IWCLL 2008 criteria.

2)To compare obinutuzumab plus chlorambucil (Arm A) versus acalabrutinib plus obinutuzumab (Arm B) and obinutuzumab plus chlorambucil (Arm A) versus acalabrutinib monotherapy (Arm C) in terms of: IRC-assessed objective response rate (ORR); Tine to next treatment (TTNT); Overall Survival (OS)

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

ELEVATE-TN is a global, phase 3, multicenter, open-label study in patients with treatment-naive chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Study enrollment is completed. The study randomized a total of 535 subjects in 142 study sites in 18 countries between 14 September 2015 through 08 February 2017. Patients were randomly assigned to receive Acalabrutinib and Obinutuzumab, Acalabrutinib monotherapy, or Obinutuzumab and oral Chlorambucil. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival between the two combination-therapy groups, defined as the time from randomization until disease progression by use of iwCLL 2008 criteria, or death, assessed by independent review committee (IRC). Crossover to Acalabrutinib was allowed in patients who progressed on Obinutuzumab-Chlorambucil.

The results of this study provide new evidence for therapy in patients with treatment-naive chronic lymphocytic leukemia by showing the efficacy of Acalabrutinib used with or without Obinutuzumab compared with chemoimmunotherapy.

Currently the study is in maintenance phase, with more than 430 subjects on study, to generate more evidence. We are not expecting any significant change in the near future.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm A - Obinutuzumab in Combination with Chlorambucil

Obinutuzumab IV infusions will be administered over a total of 6 treatment cycles starting at Cycle 1 Day 1. Chlorambucil will be orally administered on Days 1 and 15 of Cycles 1 through 6.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Obinutuzumab

Intervention Type DRUG

Chlorambucil

Intervention Type DRUG

Arm B - Acalabrutinib in Combination with Obinutuzumab

Obinutuzumab IV infusions will be administered over a total of 6 treatment cycles starting at Cycle 2 Day 1. Acalabrutinib (ACP-196) will be orally administered starting on Cycle 1 Day 1. Daily administration of Acalabrutinib (ACP-196) will continue until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Acalabrutinib

Intervention Type DRUG

Obinutuzumab

Intervention Type DRUG

Arm C - Acalabrutinib Monotherapy

Acalabrutinib (ACP-196) will be orally administered on Cycle 1 Day 1 until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Acalabrutinib

Intervention Type DRUG

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Acalabrutinib

Intervention Type DRUG

Obinutuzumab

Intervention Type DRUG

Chlorambucil

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

ACP-196 (Calquence) GAZYVA / GAZYVARO LEUKERAN

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Men and women:

a. ≥ 65 years of age OR b. \> 18 and \< 65 years of age, provided that they meet at least one of the following criteria: i. Creatinine clearance 30 to 69 mL/min using the Cockcroft-Gault equation ii. A score higher than 6 on the CIRS-G (Appendix L).
2. ECOG performance status of 0, 1, or 2.
3. Diagnosis of CD20+ CLL that meets published diagnostic criteria (Hallek 2008):

1. Monoclonal B cells (either kappa or lambda light chain restricted) that are clonally co-expressing ≥ 1 B-cell marker (CD19, CD20, or CD23) and CD5.
2. Prolymphocytes may comprise ≤ 55% of blood lymphocytes.
3. Presence of ≥ 5 x 109 B lymphocytes/L (5000 μL) in the peripheral blood (at any point since diagnosis)
4. Active disease meeting ≥ 1 of the following IWCLL 2008 criteria for requiring treatment:

1. Evidence of progressive marrow failure as manifested by the development of, or worsening of, anemia (hemoglobin \< 10 g/dL) and/or thrombocytopenia (platelets \< 100,000/μL).
2. Massive (i.e., ≥ 6 cm below the left costal margin), progressive, or symptomatic splenomegaly.
3. Massive nodes (i.e., ≥ 10 cm in the longest diameter), progressive, or symptomatic lymphadenopathy.
4. Progressive lymphocytosis with an increase of \> 50% over a 2-month period or a LDT of \< 6 months. LDT may be obtained by linear regression extrapolation of ALC obtained at intervals of 2 weeks over an observation period of 2 to 3 months. In subjects with initial blood lymphocyte counts of \< 30 x 109/L (30,000/μL), LDT should not be used as a single parameter to define indication for treatment. In addition, factors contributing to lymphocytosis or lymphadenopathy other than CLL (e.g., infections) should be excluded.
5. Autoimmune anemia and/or thrombocytopenia that is poorly responsive to standard therapy.
6. Constitutional symptoms documented in the subject's chart with supportive objective measures, as appropriate, defined as ≥ 1 of the following disease-related symptoms or signs:

i. Unintentional weight loss ≥ 10% within the previous 6 months before Screening.

ii. Significant fatigue (i.e., ECOG performance status 2; inability to work or perform usual activities).

iii. Fevers higher than 100.5°F or 38.0°C for 2 or more weeks before Screening without evidence of infection.

iv. Night sweats for \> 1 month before Screening without evidence of infection.
5. This criterion was deleted as of Protocol Amendment 3.
6. Meet the following laboratory parameters:

1. ANC ≥ 750 cells/μL (0.75 x 109/L), or ≥ 500 cells/μL (0.50 x 109/L) in subjects with documented bone marrow involvement, and independent of growth factor support 7 days before assessment.
2. Platelet count ≥ 50,000 cells/μL (50 x 109/L), or ≥ 30,000 cells/μL (30 x 109/L) in subjects with documented bone marrow involvement, and without transfusion support 7 days before assessment. Subjects with transfusion-dependent thrombocytopenia are excluded.
3. Serum AST and ALT/SGPT ≤ 3.0 x ULN.
4. Total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 x ULN.
5. Estimated creatinine clearance (i.e., eGFR using Cockcroft-Gault) ≥ 30 mL/min
7. Able to receive all outpatient treatment, all laboratory monitoring, and all radiologic evaluations.
8. Women who are sexually active and can bear children must agree to use highly effective forms of contraception while on the study and for 2 days after the last dose of acalabrutinib or 18 months after the last dose of obinutuzumab in combination with chlorambucil, whichever is longer. Highly effective forms of contraception are defined in Section 6.4.4.
9. Men who are sexually active and can beget children must agree to use highly effective forms of contraception during the study and for 90 days after the last dose of obinutuzumab or chlorambucil, whichever is later. Highly effective forms of contraception are defined in Section 6.4.4.
10. Men must agree to refrain from sperm donation during the study and for 90 days after the last dose of obinutuzumab or chlorambucil, whichever is later.
11. Must be willing and able to adhere to the study visit schedule, understand and comply with other protocol requirements, and provide written informed consent and authorization to use protected health information (in accordance with national and local subject privacy regulations). Note vulnerable subjects, as defined in International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) GCP, are not allowed on this protocol (e.g., prisoners or institutionalized subjects).

Exclusion Criteria

1. Any prior systemic treatment for CLL (note: Prior localized radiotherapy is allowed).
2. Known CNS lymphoma or leukemia.
3. Known prolymphocytic leukemia or history of, or currently suspected, Richter's syndrome.
4. Missing or incomplete documentation of FISH results reflecting the presence or absence of 17p del and the percentage of cells with the deletion in subject records before randomization.
5. Uncontrolled AIHA or ITP defined as declining hemoglobin or platelet count secondary to autoimmune destruction within the screening period or requirement for high doses of steroids (\> 20 mg daily of prednisone daily or equivalent).
6. Corticosteroid use \> 20 mg within 1 week before first dose of study drug, except as indicated for other medical conditions such as inhaled steroid for asthma, topical steroid use, or as premedication for administration of study drug or contrast. For example, subjects requiring steroids at daily doses \> 20 mg prednisone equivalent systemic exposure daily, or those who are administered steroids for leukemia control or WBC count lowering are excluded.
7. Major surgery within 4 weeks before first dose of study drug.
8. History of prior malignancy except for the following:

1. Malignancy treated with curative intent and with no evidence of active disease present for more than 3 years before Screening and felt to be at low risk for recurrence by treating physician.
2. Adequately treated lentigo maligna melanoma without current evidence of disease or adequately controlled non-melanomatous skin cancer.
3. Adequately treated cervical carcinoma in situ without current evidence of disease.
9. Significant cardiovascular disease such as uncontrolled or symptomatic arrhythmias, congestive heart failure, or myocardial infarction within 6 months of screening, or any Class 3 or 4 cardiac disease as defined by the New York Heart Association Functional Classification, or QTc \> 480 msec at screening.
10. Unable to swallow capsules or malabsorption syndrome, disease significantly affecting gastrointestinal function, or resection of the stomach or small bowel or gastric bypass, symptomatic inflammatory bowel disease, or partial or complete bowel obstruction.
11. Uncontrolled active systemic fungal, bacterial, viral, or other infection (defined as exhibiting ongoing signs/symptoms related to the infection and without improvement, despite appropriate antibiotics or other treatment) or ongoing intravenous anti-infective treatment.
12. Known history of infection with HIV. 13. Vaccinated with live, attenuated vaccines within 4 weeks of first dose of study drug.

14\. Serologic status reflecting active hepatitis B or C infection. Subjects with hepatitis B core antibody positive who are surface antigen negative or who are hepatitis C antibody positive will need to have a negative PCR result before randomization. Those who are hepatitis B surface antigen positive or hepatitis B PCR positive and those who are hepatitis C PCR positive will be excluded.

15\. History of stroke or intracranial hemorrhage within 6 months before randomization.

16\. Known history of a bleeding diathesis (e.g., hemophilia, von Willebrand disease).

17\. Requires or receiving anticoagulation with warfarin or equivalent vitamin K antagonists (e.g., phenprocoumon) within 7 days of first dose of study drug.

18\. Requires treatment with proton-pump inhibitors (e.g., omeprazole, esomeprazole, lansoprazole, dexlansoprazole, rabeprazole, or pantoprazole).

19\. Breast feeding or pregnant. 20. Current life-threatening illness, medical condition, or organ system dysfunction which, in the Investigator's opinion, could compromise the subject's safety or put the study at risk.

21\. Concurrent participation in another therapeutic clinical trial. 22. Requires treatment with a strong CYP3A inhibitor/inducer. 23. Presence of a gastrointestinal ulcer diagnosed by endoscopy within 3 months before screening.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Acerta Pharma BV

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

AstraZeneca Clinical Study Information Center

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

1-877-240-9479 [email protected]

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Research Site

Goodyear, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Anaheim, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Oxnard, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Palo Alto, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Aurora, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Lone Tree, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Fort Myers, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Tallahassee, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Tallahassee, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Niles, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Lafayette, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Wichita, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Research Site

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Research Site

COL, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Saint Cloud, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Billings, Montana, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Brick, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Hackensack, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Lake Success, New York, United States

Site Status

Research Site

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Blue Ash, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Canton, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Bedford, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Fort Sam Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

New Braunfels, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Round Rock, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Texas City, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Tyler, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Roanoke, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Spokane, Washington, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Tacoma, Washington, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Yakima, Washington, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Northwest WA, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Darlinghurst, , Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Frankston, , Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Geelong, , Australia

Site Status

Research Site

South Brisbane, , Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Waratah NSW, , Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Wollongong, , Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Woodville, , Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Bruges, , Belgium

Site Status

Research Site

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Research Site

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Research Site

Ghent, , Belgium

Site Status

Research Site

Kortrijk, , Belgium

Site Status

Research Site

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

Research Site

Roeselare, , Belgium

Site Status

Research Site

Wilrijk, , Belgium

Site Status

Research Site

Yvoir, , Belgium

Site Status

Research Site

Barretos, , Brazil

Site Status

Research Site

Florianópolis, , Brazil

Site Status

Research Site

Passo Fundo, , Brazil

Site Status

Research Site

Porto Alegre, , Brazil

Site Status

Research Site

Porto Alegre, , Brazil

Site Status

Research Site

São Paulo, , Brazil

Site Status

Research Site

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Québec, , Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Saint John, , Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Winnipeg, , Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Santiago, , Chile

Site Status

Research Site

Temuco, , Chile

Site Status

Research Site

Medellín, , Colombia

Site Status

Research Site

Montería, , Colombia

Site Status

Research Site

Bobigny, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Dijon, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Pierre-Bénite, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Strasbourg, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Villejuif, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Aschaffenburg, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Bielefeld, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Erlangen, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Heilbronn, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Warzburg, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Debrecen, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Kaposvár, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Szolnok, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Ashkelon, , Israel

Site Status

Research Site

Beersheba, , Israel

Site Status

Research Site

Haifa, , Israel

Site Status

Research Site

Haifa, , Israel

Site Status

Research Site

Haifa, , Israel

Site Status

Research Site

Jerusalem, , Israel

Site Status

Research Site

Nahariya, , Israel

Site Status

Research Site

Petah Tikvah, , Israel

Site Status

Research Site

Petah Tikvah, , Israel

Site Status

Research Site

Rehovot, , Israel

Site Status

Research Site

Tel Aviv, , Israel

Site Status

Research Site

Tel Litwinsky, , Israel

Site Status

Research Site

Tiberias, , Israel

Site Status

Research Site

Alessandria, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Aviano, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Brescia, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Florence, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Meldola, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Parma, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Ravenna, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Rimini, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Rome, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Rozzano, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Kaunas, , Lithuania

Site Status

Research Site

Klaipėda, , Lithuania

Site Status

Research Site

Vilnius, , Lithuania

Site Status

Research Site

Auckland, , New Zealand

Site Status

Research Site

Otahuhu, , New Zealand

Site Status

Research Site

Tauranga, , New Zealand

Site Status

Research Site

Bydgoszcz, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Gdansk, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Gdynia, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Lodz, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Lublin, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Olsztyn, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Opole, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Słupsk, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Majadahonda, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Santander, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Gothenburg, , Sweden

Site Status

Research Site

Linköping, , Sweden

Site Status

Research Site

Lund, , Sweden

Site Status

Research Site

Örebro, , Sweden

Site Status

Research Site

Bournemouth, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

Cambridge, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

Leeds, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

Leicester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

Plymouth, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

Southampton, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

Truro, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

Wolverhampton, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Belgium Brazil Canada Chile Colombia France Germany Hungary Israel Italy Lithuania New Zealand Poland Spain Sweden United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Sharman JP, Egyed M, Jurczak W, Skarbnik A, Patel K, Flinn IW, Kamdar M, Munir T, Walewska R, Hughes M, Fogliatto LM, Herishanu Y, Banerji V, Follows G, Walker P, Ghia P, Janssens A, Byrd JC, Ferrant E, Ferrajoli A, Wierda WG, Wachira CW, Suterwala BT, Miranda P, Munugalavadla V, Wun CC, Woyach JA. Acalabrutinib-obinutuzumab improves survival vs chemoimmunotherapy in treatment-naive CLL in the 6-year follow-up of ELEVATE-TN. Blood. 2025 Sep 11;146(11):1276-1285. doi: 10.1182/blood.2024024476.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40198878 (View on PubMed)

Kittai AS, Allan JN, James D, Bridge H, Miranda M, Yong ASM, Fam F, Roos J, Shetty V, Skarbnik A, Davids MS. An indirect comparison of acalabrutinib with and without obinutuzumab vs zanubrutinib in treatment-naive CLL. Blood Adv. 2024 Jun 11;8(11):2861-2869. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023012142.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38598745 (View on PubMed)

Sharman JP, Egyed M, Jurczak W, Skarbnik A, Pagel JM, Flinn IW, Kamdar M, Munir T, Walewska R, Corbett G, Fogliatto LM, Herishanu Y, Banerji V, Coutre S, Follows G, Walker P, Karlsson K, Ghia P, Janssens A, Cymbalista F, Woyach JA, Salles G, Wierda WG, Izumi R, Munugalavadla V, Patel P, Wang MH, Wong S, Byrd JC. Acalabrutinib with or without obinutuzumab versus chlorambucil and obinutuzmab for treatment-naive chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (ELEVATE TN): a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2020 Apr 18;395(10232):1278-1291. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30262-2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32305093 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2023-509348-84-00

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2014-005582-73

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

ACE-CL-007

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.