Pain Perception With Tenaculum Placement

NCT ID: NCT02969421

Last Updated: 2019-03-18

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

66 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-01-10

Study Completion Date

2017-02-23

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Randomized controlled trial that compares methods of tenaculum placement during intrauterine device insertion and their effect on pain. The two methods being compared are slow tenaculum placement versus tenaculum placement at time of cough. Subjects will be asked to rate their pain using visual analog scale. Primary outcome measured is pain at time of tenaculum placement. Secondary outcomes are overall pain with intrauterine device insertion and provider satisfaction with tenaculum placement.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The two commonly described strategies for tenaculum placement, slow versus having the patient cough while the tenaculum is placed are utilized by providers based on preference and/or their previous training. There is no published study that compares these methods to one another. The investigators aim to compare these strategies, slow tenaculum placement versus the cough method, and their effects on pain at time of placement. 96 subjects will be randomized to each method. The subject will be asked to rate their pain using a 100-mm visual analog scale after speculum placement, after tenaculum is placed, and after completion of the procedure. The provider will be asked to rate their satisfaction with tenaculum placement on a Likert-type 5 point satisfaction scale. 1: not at all satisfied, 2: slightly satisfied, 3: moderately satisfied, 4: very satisfied, 5: extremely satisfied. All data to be collected using REDCap database.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Slow Tenaculum Placement

This group will have their tenaculum placed using the slow method

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Slow Tenaculum Placement of tenaculum

Intervention Type OTHER

The intervention in this arm is the placement of tenaculum via slow method

Cough Method

This group will have their tenaculum placed using the cough method

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Cough method for placement of tenaculum

Intervention Type OTHER

The intervention in this arm is the placement of tenaculum via cough method

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Cough method for placement of tenaculum

The intervention in this arm is the placement of tenaculum via cough method

Intervention Type OTHER

Slow Tenaculum Placement of tenaculum

The intervention in this arm is the placement of tenaculum via slow method

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Women ages 18 years and older
* Undergoing intrauterine device placement
* English or Spanish speaking

Exclusion Criteria

* Primary language other than English or Spanish
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

55 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Duke University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lambert T, Truong T, Gray B. Pain perception with cervical tenaculum placement during intrauterine device insertion: a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2020 Apr;46(2):126-131. doi: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2019-200376. Epub 2019 Oct 30.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31666302 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Pro00078232

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

A Device Study in Healthy Participants
NCT04848402 COMPLETED PHASE1
Simplified IUD Insertion Technique
NCT02733081 WITHDRAWN NA