RAPID EC - Rct Assessing Pregnancy With Intrauterine Devices for EC

NCT ID: NCT02175030

Last Updated: 2022-06-29

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

711 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-08-31

Study Completion Date

2020-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is a randomized trial of two IUDs for emergency contraception: the copper IUD, the most effective method of emergency contraception vs. the levonorgestrel IUD, the most preferred IUD which has never been tested as an emergency contraceptive. This research has the potential to increase use of highly effective contraception in a high-risk population and lower the persistently elevated rate of U.S. unintended pregnancy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Unintended pregnancy has multiple adverse effects on both maternal and child health. The United States continues to have one of the highest rates of unintended pregnancy among developed countries. To combat this problem, we are studying initiation of the highly effective intrauterine device (IUD) for women presenting for emergency contraception (EC). This is an ideal population to initiate highly effective reversible contraception (HERC) as they are at high risk of unintended pregnancy and are acting to reduce that risk. We have recently demonstrated significantly lower pregnancy rates 12 months after presenting for EC among women who selected the copper IUD versus those who selected oral Levonorgestrel (LNG).

Not only is the copper IUD the most effective method of EC, it is considered a top tier anticipatory contraception method and its ability to prevent pregnancy is on par with tubal sterilization (less than 1% in the first year with lower failure rates in subsequent years). However, women selecting intrauterine contraception have shown a strong preference for the LNG IUD. The LNG IUD, is as effective at preventing pregnancy as the Copper IUD, and has some non-contraceptive effects that many women see as benefits such as the reduction or elimination of menstrual bleeding and menstrual related discomfort. Of currently available reversible contraceptives, the LNG IUD has the highest levels of user satisfaction and continuation. However, its effectiveness as an emergency contraceptive remains unknown. A randomized control trial is necessary to assess the safety and efficacy of the LNG IUD as EC. Demonstrating the efficacy, safety, and acceptability of the LNG IUD for EC will improve options for women seeking EC and who desire a highly effective method of contraception.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Contraception

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Copper T380 IUD

Randomized to copper T380 IUD for EC (emergency contraception)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Copper IUD

Intervention Type DRUG

Randomization to copper/Paragard IUD for emergency contraception

LNG20 IUD

Randomized to LNG20 IUD for EC (emergency contraception)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Levonorgestrel IUD

Intervention Type DRUG

Randomization to Levonorgestrel/Mirena IUD for emergency contraception

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Copper IUD

Randomization to copper/Paragard IUD for emergency contraception

Intervention Type DRUG

Levonorgestrel IUD

Randomization to Levonorgestrel/Mirena IUD for emergency contraception

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Paragard IUD Mirena IUD, LNG20 IUD, Levonorgestrel IUD, Liletta IUD

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Females between 18-35 years old
* In need of EC (had unprotected intercourse within 120 hours - 5 days)
* Desire to prevent pregnancy for 1 year
* Fluent in English and/or Spanish
* Have a regular menstrual cycle (21-35 days)
* Know their last menstrual period (+/-3 days)
* Be willing to comply with the study requirements
* Desire to initiate an IUD
* Negative urine pregnancy test

Exclusion Criteria

* Current pregnancy
* Breastfeeding
* Intrauterine infection within the past three months
* Sterilization
* Already have an IUD or contraception implant (Nexplanon) in place
* Vaginal bleeding of unknown etiology
* Known Gonorrhea or Chlamydia infection in the last 30 days (unless successfully treated at least 7 days prior to study entry)
* Known abnormalities of the uterus that distort the uterine cavity
* Allergy to copper
* Use of oral Emergency Contraception in the preceeding 5 days
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

35 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Utah

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

David Turok

M.D.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

David Turok, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Utah

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Planned Parenthood Association of Utah

Logan, Utah, United States

Site Status

Planned Parenthood Association of Utah

Ogden, Utah, United States

Site Status

Planned Parenthood Association of Utah

Orem, Utah, United States

Site Status

Planned Parenthood Association of Utah

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Planned Parenthood Association of Utah

South Jordan, Utah, United States

Site Status

Planned Parenthood Association of Utah

West Valley City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kaiser JE, Turok DK, Gero A, Gawron LM, Simmons RG, Sanders JN. One-year pregnancy and continuation rates after placement of levonorgestrel or copper intrauterine devices for emergency contraception: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Apr;228(4):438.e1-438.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.11.1296. Epub 2022 Nov 23.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36427600 (View on PubMed)

BakenRa A, Gero A, Sanders J, Simmons R, Fay K, Turok DK. Pregnancy Risk by Frequency and Timing of Unprotected Intercourse Before Intrauterine Device Placement for Emergency Contraception. Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jul 1;138(1):79-84. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004433.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34259467 (View on PubMed)

Boraas CM, Sanders JN, Schwarz EB, Thompson I, Turok DK. Risk of Pregnancy With Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System Placement 6-14 Days After Unprotected Sexual Intercourse. Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Apr 1;137(4):623-625. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004118.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33706343 (View on PubMed)

Turok DK, Gero A, Simmons RG, Kaiser JE, Stoddard GJ, Sexsmith CD, Gawron LM, Sanders JN. Levonorgestrel vs. Copper Intrauterine Devices for Emergency Contraception. N Engl J Med. 2021 Jan 28;384(4):335-344. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2022141.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33503342 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

73554

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Novel Cervical Retraction Device
NCT02283463 UNKNOWN NA