A Prospective Trial Comparing Metal to Plastic Speculums for Patient Comfort
NCT ID: NCT01788124
Last Updated: 2013-02-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
160 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2012-07-31
2012-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Pain Perception With Tenaculum Placement
NCT02969421
Pilot Study of Suction as a Mechanism of IUD Expulsion With Concomitant Menstrual Cup Use
NCT05254041
Novel Cervical Retraction Device
NCT02283463
Explorative Clinical Study on the Performance and Acceptance of New Intermittent Catheters in Healthy Volunteers
NCT04231149
Fast Versus Slow Tenaculum Placement
NCT02716636
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Typically two types of speculums are used in clinical practice, metal and plastic. There are advantages to both, and usage is usually predicated by physician preference. Previous studies have demonstrated a clear difference in patient comfort between metal speculums and newer dilating speculums such as the Vera scope (1). Clinical trials have also shown the benefit of using lubrication on metal speculums during routine exams (2). To date there are no clinical trails to examine the difference in patient comfort between metal and plastic bi-valve speculums.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Metal Speculum
exam with metal speculum
No interventions assigned to this group
Plastic Speculum
exam with plastic speculum
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Women ≥ 18 years of age
* Women willing and able to give informed consent according to the guidelines established by the St John IRB
Exclusion Criteria
* Women whose English language skills are insufficient to understand the written informed consent or the post examination questionnaire.
* Any woman for who use of a speculum is contraindicated.
* Any woman with a condition that might alter pain perception
* Current pain medication use
* History of drug abuse
* History of painful speculum examination
* Menopausal women
* Women who are pregnant or within 6 weeks of delivery
* Women presenting with dyspareunia, vaginitis, vulvar pain or vulvar lesions
* Women presenting for a vulvar, vaginal or uterine procedure.
* Women who have had a previous abnormal PAP smear (Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia \>1)
* Women ≤ 18 years of age.
* Women who have never had vaginal intercourse.
* Women who have never had a speculum examination in the past
18 Years
85 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
St. John Health System, Michigan
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Michael Shaw PhD
Research Coordinator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
St John Macomb Oakland Hospital
Warren, Michigan, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
macomb0001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.