Botulinum Toxin Type A in Preventing Complications After Surgery in Patients With Esophageal Cancer

NCT ID: NCT02965976

Last Updated: 2023-02-16

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

33 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-12-30

Study Completion Date

2022-04-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This randomized phase II trial studies how well botulinum toxin type A works in preventing complication after surgery in patients with esophageal cancer. Botulinum toxin type A may cause less complications of nausea and vomiting after surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. Determine if intra-pyloric botulinum toxin type A (botulinum toxin) injection (Botox) during a minimally invasive esophagectomy decreases postoperative occurrence of delayed gastric emptying.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. Determine if intra-pyloric botulinum toxin injection during a minimally invasive esophagectomy reduces the number of repeat procedures for delayed gastric emptying within 90 days.

II. Determine if intra-pyloric botulinum toxin injection during a minimally invasive esophagectomy decreases time to oral intake meeting 100% of nutritional requirements.

III. Determine if intra-pyloric botulinum toxin injection during a minimally invasive esophagectomy reduces the incidence of pulmonary complications directly related to delayed gastric emptying.

IV. Determine if intra-pyloric botulinum toxin injection during a minimally invasive esophagectomy reduces hospital length of stay related to delayed gastric emptying.

V. Determine if intra-pyloric botulinum toxin injection during a minimally invasive esophagectomy increases patient quality of life.

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.

ARM I: Patients receive botulinum toxin type A injection intramuscularly (IM) while undergoing standard minimally invasive esophagectomy.

ARM II: Patients undergo standard minimally invasive esophagectomy.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 2, 3-4, and 6-8 weeks, and at 90 days.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Esophageal Carcinoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm I (botulinum toxin type A, esophagectomy)

Patients receive botulinum toxin type A injection IM while undergoing standard minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Botulinum Toxin Type A

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Given IM

Esophagectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Undergo esophagectomy

Quality-of-Life Assessment

Intervention Type OTHER

Ancillary studies

Arm II (esophagectomy)

Patients undergo standard minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Esophagectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Undergo esophagectomy

Quality-of-Life Assessment

Intervention Type OTHER

Ancillary studies

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Botulinum Toxin Type A

Given IM

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Esophagectomy

Undergo esophagectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Quality-of-Life Assessment

Ancillary studies

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

AbobotulinumtoxinA Botox Botox Cosmetic Botulinum A Toxin Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A Botulinum Toxin A BTX-A Dysport EvabotulinumtoxinA IncobotulinumtoxinA OnabotulinumtoxinA Onaclostox Xeomin excision of the esophagus Quality of Life Assessment

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Esophageal carcinoma, undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy with intrathoracic anastomosis
* Have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of =\< 2
* Participant must understand the investigational nature of this study and sign an Independent Ethics Committee/Institutional Review Board approved written informed consent form prior to receiving any study related procedure

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients who have a history of gastrointestinal dysmotility or functional gastroparesis, including diabetic gastroparesis, central and peripheral nervous system disorders, renal failure, medication side effects, including chronic dependence of promotility agents, anticholinergic antispasmodic agents, or chronic narcotic use over 2 years due to non-cancer causes
* Patients who have a history of previous gastric or duodenal surgery
* Patients who have a history of duodenal ulcer or duodenal fibrosis
* Uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to, ongoing or active infection, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia, or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements
* Allergy to botulinum toxin and/or egg
* Pregnant or nursing female participants
* Unwilling or unable to follow protocol requirements
* Any condition which in the investigator's opinion deems the participant an unsuitable candidate for study participation
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Roswell Park Cancer Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Moshim Kukar

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Roswell Park Cancer Institute

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Roswell Park Cancer Institute

Buffalo, New York, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NCI-2016-01568

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

I 283516

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

I 283516

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Esophageal Cancer Risk Registry
NCT00260585 RECRUITING