Trial Outcomes & Findings for Botulinum Toxin Type A in Preventing Complications After Surgery in Patients With Esophageal Cancer (NCT NCT02965976)

NCT ID: NCT02965976

Last Updated: 2023-02-16

Results Overview

Will be assessed using the intent-to-treat principle and a one-sided Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE2

Target enrollment

33 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Up to day 21

Results posted on

2023-02-16

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Arm I (Botulinum Toxin Type A, Esophagectomy)
Patients receive botulinum toxin type A injection IM while undergoing standard minimally invasive esophagectomy. Botulinum Toxin Type A: Given IM Esophagectomy: Undergo esophagectomy Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies
Arm II (Esophagectomy)
Patients undergo standard minimally invasive esophagectomy. Esophagectomy: Undergo esophagectomy Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies
Overall Study
STARTED
15
17
Overall Study
COMPLETED
13
17
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
2
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Arm I (Botulinum Toxin Type A, Esophagectomy)
Patients receive botulinum toxin type A injection IM while undergoing standard minimally invasive esophagectomy. Botulinum Toxin Type A: Given IM Esophagectomy: Undergo esophagectomy Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies
Arm II (Esophagectomy)
Patients undergo standard minimally invasive esophagectomy. Esophagectomy: Undergo esophagectomy Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
2
0

Baseline Characteristics

Botulinum Toxin Type A in Preventing Complications After Surgery in Patients With Esophageal Cancer

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Arm I (Botulinum Toxin Type A, Esophagectomy)
n=15 Participants
Patients receive botulinum toxin type A injection IM while undergoing standard minimally invasive esophagectomy. Botulinum Toxin Type A: Given IM Esophagectomy: Undergo esophagectomy Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies
Arm II (Esophagectomy)
n=17 Participants
Patients undergo standard minimally invasive esophagectomy. Esophagectomy: Undergo esophagectomy Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies
Total
n=32 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
8 Participants
n=7 Participants
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Continuous
64.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.0 • n=5 Participants
61.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.0 • n=7 Participants
62.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
15 Participants
n=7 Participants
30 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
16 Participants
n=7 Participants
30 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
15 participants
n=5 Participants
17 participants
n=7 Participants
32 participants
n=5 Participants
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Status
Yes
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
16 Participants
n=7 Participants
30 Participants
n=5 Participants
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Status
No
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
Self Reported Smoking Status
Never Smoked
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Self Reported Smoking Status
Former Smoker
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
16 Participants
n=7 Participants
31 Participants
n=5 Participants
Self Reported Smoking Status
Current Smoker
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Diabetes Status
Yes
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
Diabetes Status
No
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
12 Participants
n=7 Participants
23 Participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to day 21

Population: In Arm I, 2 patients withdrew prior to assessment of primary and secondary outcomes.

Will be assessed using the intent-to-treat principle and a one-sided Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Arm I (Botulinum Toxin Type A, Esophagectomy)
n=13 Participants
Patients receive botulinum toxin type A injection IM while undergoing standard minimally invasive esophagectomy. Botulinum Toxin Type A: Given IM Esophagectomy: Undergo esophagectomy Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies
Arm II (Esophagectomy)
n=17 Participants
Patients undergo standard minimally invasive esophagectomy. Esophagectomy: Undergo esophagectomy Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies
Delayed Gastric Emptying Assessed Radiographically by Nuclear Medicine Emptying Study
Delayed Gastric Emptying
12 Participants
14 Participants
Delayed Gastric Emptying Assessed Radiographically by Nuclear Medicine Emptying Study
No Delayed Gastric Emptying
1 Participants
3 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At day 7

Population: 2 patients in Arm I withdrew prior to any assessments.

Delayed gastric emptying assessed Radiographically by Gastrografin Swallow OR CT Esophagram at day 7. Will be compared between treatment arms using the two-sided CMH exact test.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Arm I (Botulinum Toxin Type A, Esophagectomy)
n=13 Participants
Patients receive botulinum toxin type A injection IM while undergoing standard minimally invasive esophagectomy. Botulinum Toxin Type A: Given IM Esophagectomy: Undergo esophagectomy Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies
Arm II (Esophagectomy)
n=17 Participants
Patients undergo standard minimally invasive esophagectomy. Esophagectomy: Undergo esophagectomy Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies
Delayed Gastric Emptying Assessed Radiographically by Gastrografin Swallow OR CT Esophagram
Delayed gastric Emptying
12 Participants
14 Participants
Delayed Gastric Emptying Assessed Radiographically by Gastrografin Swallow OR CT Esophagram
No Delayed Gastric Emptying
1 Participants
3 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to day 35

Population: 2 patients in Arm I withdrew prior to study assessments. Data were not captured and is unavailable for 1 patient in Arm I and 4 patients in Arm II.

The days to resumption of oral feeding are calculated based on return to a solid diet. Will be compared between treatment arms using the two sided independent-sample, stratified T-test.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Arm I (Botulinum Toxin Type A, Esophagectomy)
n=10 Participants
Patients receive botulinum toxin type A injection IM while undergoing standard minimally invasive esophagectomy. Botulinum Toxin Type A: Given IM Esophagectomy: Undergo esophagectomy Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies
Arm II (Esophagectomy)
n=13 Participants
Patients undergo standard minimally invasive esophagectomy. Esophagectomy: Undergo esophagectomy Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies
Gastrointestinal and Nutritional Status Including Days to Resumption of Oral Feeding as Assessed by Dietician
22.6 days
Standard Deviation 4.7
27 days
Standard Deviation 16.2

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to 90 days

Population: 2 participants in arm I withdrew prior to any study assessments. Data were not captured and unavailable for 1 patient in Arm I and 1 patient in Arm II.

The total length of stay is calculated as the difference between the date of procedure and date of discharge. Will be compared between treatment arms using the two sided independent-sample, stratified T-test.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Arm I (Botulinum Toxin Type A, Esophagectomy)
n=10 Participants
Patients receive botulinum toxin type A injection IM while undergoing standard minimally invasive esophagectomy. Botulinum Toxin Type A: Given IM Esophagectomy: Undergo esophagectomy Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies
Arm II (Esophagectomy)
n=16 Participants
Patients undergo standard minimally invasive esophagectomy. Esophagectomy: Undergo esophagectomy Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies
Hospital Length of Stay Attributed to Delayed Gastric Emptying
7.9 days
Standard Deviation 4.2
8.1 days
Standard Deviation 1.9

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to 90 days

Population: 2 participants in arm I withdrew prior to any study assessments. Data were not captured and unavailable for 2 patients in Arm I and 2 patients in Arm II.

The rate of secondary procedures (within 90 days) will be compared between treatment arms using a one-sided CMH exact test.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Arm I (Botulinum Toxin Type A, Esophagectomy)
n=11 Participants
Patients receive botulinum toxin type A injection IM while undergoing standard minimally invasive esophagectomy. Botulinum Toxin Type A: Given IM Esophagectomy: Undergo esophagectomy Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies
Arm II (Esophagectomy)
n=15 Participants
Patients undergo standard minimally invasive esophagectomy. Esophagectomy: Undergo esophagectomy Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies
Secondary Procedure Due to Delayed Gastric Emptying
Reoperation
1 Participants
0 Participants
Secondary Procedure Due to Delayed Gastric Emptying
No Reoperation
10 Participants
15 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to day 90

Population: 2 participants in arm I withdrew prior to any study assessments. Data were not captured and unavailable for 1 patient in Arm I and 1 patient in Arm II.

The rate of post-operative pulmonary events will be compared between treatment arms using the two-sided CMH exact test.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Arm I (Botulinum Toxin Type A, Esophagectomy)
n=12 Participants
Patients receive botulinum toxin type A injection IM while undergoing standard minimally invasive esophagectomy. Botulinum Toxin Type A: Given IM Esophagectomy: Undergo esophagectomy Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies
Arm II (Esophagectomy)
n=16 Participants
Patients undergo standard minimally invasive esophagectomy. Esophagectomy: Undergo esophagectomy Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies
Pulmonary Events Directly Related to Delayed Gastric Emptying as Assessed by Operating Surgeon
Pulmonary Complication
3 Participants
3 Participants
Pulmonary Events Directly Related to Delayed Gastric Emptying as Assessed by Operating Surgeon
No Pulmonary Complication
9 Participants
13 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to day 90

Population: The quality of life data were not captured.

Will be compared between treatment arms using the two sided independent-sample, stratified T-test.

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

Adverse Events

Arm I (Botulinum Toxin Type A, Esophagectomy)

Serious events: 1 serious events
Other events: 8 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Arm II (Esophagectomy)

Serious events: 2 serious events
Other events: 10 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Arm I (Botulinum Toxin Type A, Esophagectomy)
n=15 participants at risk
Patients receive botulinum toxin type A injection IM while undergoing standard minimally invasive esophagectomy. Botulinum Toxin Type A: Given IM Esophagectomy: Undergo esophagectomy Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies
Arm II (Esophagectomy)
n=17 participants at risk
Patients undergo standard minimally invasive esophagectomy. Esophagectomy: Undergo esophagectomy Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
Surgical and medical procedures
Postoperative thoracic procedure complication
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Arm I (Botulinum Toxin Type A, Esophagectomy)
n=15 participants at risk
Patients receive botulinum toxin type A injection IM while undergoing standard minimally invasive esophagectomy. Botulinum Toxin Type A: Given IM Esophagectomy: Undergo esophagectomy Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies
Arm II (Esophagectomy)
n=17 participants at risk
Patients undergo standard minimally invasive esophagectomy. Esophagectomy: Undergo esophagectomy Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Anorexia
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Aspiration
13.3%
2/15 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Atelectasis
13.3%
2/15 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
23.5%
4/17 • Number of events 4 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
17.6%
3/17 • Number of events 4 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Bloating
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
11.8%
2/17 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
Cardiac disorders
Chest pain
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
11.8%
2/17 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
26.7%
4/15 • Number of events 4 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
35.3%
6/17 • Number of events 8 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
29.4%
5/17 • Number of events 5 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
General disorders
Fatigue
20.0%
3/15 • Number of events 4 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
23.5%
4/17 • Number of events 4 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
Cardiac disorders
Hypotension
13.3%
2/15 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
20.0%
3/15 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
23.5%
4/17 • Number of events 4 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleural effusion
20.0%
3/15 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
17.6%
3/17 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumothorax
13.3%
2/15 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
29.4%
5/17 • Number of events 5 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Shortness of breath
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
17.6%
3/17 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary retention
13.3%
2/15 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
17.6%
3/17 • Number of events 4 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
General disorders
Weakness
20.0%
3/15 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
11.8%
2/17 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.

Additional Information

Kris Attwood

Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center

Phone: 716-845-2300

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place