Trial Outcomes & Findings for Botulinum Toxin Type A in Preventing Complications After Surgery in Patients With Esophageal Cancer (NCT NCT02965976)
NCT ID: NCT02965976
Last Updated: 2023-02-16
Results Overview
Will be assessed using the intent-to-treat principle and a one-sided Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
33 participants
Up to day 21
2023-02-16
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Arm I (Botulinum Toxin Type A, Esophagectomy)
Patients receive botulinum toxin type A injection IM while undergoing standard minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Botulinum Toxin Type A: Given IM
Esophagectomy: Undergo esophagectomy
Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies
|
Arm II (Esophagectomy)
Patients undergo standard minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Esophagectomy: Undergo esophagectomy
Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
15
|
17
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
13
|
17
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
2
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Arm I (Botulinum Toxin Type A, Esophagectomy)
Patients receive botulinum toxin type A injection IM while undergoing standard minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Botulinum Toxin Type A: Given IM
Esophagectomy: Undergo esophagectomy
Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies
|
Arm II (Esophagectomy)
Patients undergo standard minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Esophagectomy: Undergo esophagectomy
Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
2
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Botulinum Toxin Type A in Preventing Complications After Surgery in Patients With Esophageal Cancer
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Arm I (Botulinum Toxin Type A, Esophagectomy)
n=15 Participants
Patients receive botulinum toxin type A injection IM while undergoing standard minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Botulinum Toxin Type A: Given IM
Esophagectomy: Undergo esophagectomy
Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies
|
Arm II (Esophagectomy)
n=17 Participants
Patients undergo standard minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Esophagectomy: Undergo esophagectomy
Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies
|
Total
n=32 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
64.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.0 • n=5 Participants
|
61.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.0 • n=7 Participants
|
62.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
30 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
30 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
15 participants
n=5 Participants
|
17 participants
n=7 Participants
|
32 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Status
Yes
|
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
30 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Status
No
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Self Reported Smoking Status
Never Smoked
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Self Reported Smoking Status
Former Smoker
|
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
31 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Self Reported Smoking Status
Current Smoker
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Diabetes Status
Yes
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Diabetes Status
No
|
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to day 21Population: In Arm I, 2 patients withdrew prior to assessment of primary and secondary outcomes.
Will be assessed using the intent-to-treat principle and a one-sided Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm I (Botulinum Toxin Type A, Esophagectomy)
n=13 Participants
Patients receive botulinum toxin type A injection IM while undergoing standard minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Botulinum Toxin Type A: Given IM
Esophagectomy: Undergo esophagectomy
Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies
|
Arm II (Esophagectomy)
n=17 Participants
Patients undergo standard minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Esophagectomy: Undergo esophagectomy
Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies
|
|---|---|---|
|
Delayed Gastric Emptying Assessed Radiographically by Nuclear Medicine Emptying Study
Delayed Gastric Emptying
|
12 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
|
Delayed Gastric Emptying Assessed Radiographically by Nuclear Medicine Emptying Study
No Delayed Gastric Emptying
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At day 7Population: 2 patients in Arm I withdrew prior to any assessments.
Delayed gastric emptying assessed Radiographically by Gastrografin Swallow OR CT Esophagram at day 7. Will be compared between treatment arms using the two-sided CMH exact test.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm I (Botulinum Toxin Type A, Esophagectomy)
n=13 Participants
Patients receive botulinum toxin type A injection IM while undergoing standard minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Botulinum Toxin Type A: Given IM
Esophagectomy: Undergo esophagectomy
Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies
|
Arm II (Esophagectomy)
n=17 Participants
Patients undergo standard minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Esophagectomy: Undergo esophagectomy
Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies
|
|---|---|---|
|
Delayed Gastric Emptying Assessed Radiographically by Gastrografin Swallow OR CT Esophagram
Delayed gastric Emptying
|
12 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
|
Delayed Gastric Emptying Assessed Radiographically by Gastrografin Swallow OR CT Esophagram
No Delayed Gastric Emptying
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to day 35Population: 2 patients in Arm I withdrew prior to study assessments. Data were not captured and is unavailable for 1 patient in Arm I and 4 patients in Arm II.
The days to resumption of oral feeding are calculated based on return to a solid diet. Will be compared between treatment arms using the two sided independent-sample, stratified T-test.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm I (Botulinum Toxin Type A, Esophagectomy)
n=10 Participants
Patients receive botulinum toxin type A injection IM while undergoing standard minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Botulinum Toxin Type A: Given IM
Esophagectomy: Undergo esophagectomy
Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies
|
Arm II (Esophagectomy)
n=13 Participants
Patients undergo standard minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Esophagectomy: Undergo esophagectomy
Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies
|
|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal and Nutritional Status Including Days to Resumption of Oral Feeding as Assessed by Dietician
|
22.6 days
Standard Deviation 4.7
|
27 days
Standard Deviation 16.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 90 daysPopulation: 2 participants in arm I withdrew prior to any study assessments. Data were not captured and unavailable for 1 patient in Arm I and 1 patient in Arm II.
The total length of stay is calculated as the difference between the date of procedure and date of discharge. Will be compared between treatment arms using the two sided independent-sample, stratified T-test.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm I (Botulinum Toxin Type A, Esophagectomy)
n=10 Participants
Patients receive botulinum toxin type A injection IM while undergoing standard minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Botulinum Toxin Type A: Given IM
Esophagectomy: Undergo esophagectomy
Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies
|
Arm II (Esophagectomy)
n=16 Participants
Patients undergo standard minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Esophagectomy: Undergo esophagectomy
Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies
|
|---|---|---|
|
Hospital Length of Stay Attributed to Delayed Gastric Emptying
|
7.9 days
Standard Deviation 4.2
|
8.1 days
Standard Deviation 1.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 90 daysPopulation: 2 participants in arm I withdrew prior to any study assessments. Data were not captured and unavailable for 2 patients in Arm I and 2 patients in Arm II.
The rate of secondary procedures (within 90 days) will be compared between treatment arms using a one-sided CMH exact test.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm I (Botulinum Toxin Type A, Esophagectomy)
n=11 Participants
Patients receive botulinum toxin type A injection IM while undergoing standard minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Botulinum Toxin Type A: Given IM
Esophagectomy: Undergo esophagectomy
Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies
|
Arm II (Esophagectomy)
n=15 Participants
Patients undergo standard minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Esophagectomy: Undergo esophagectomy
Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies
|
|---|---|---|
|
Secondary Procedure Due to Delayed Gastric Emptying
Reoperation
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Secondary Procedure Due to Delayed Gastric Emptying
No Reoperation
|
10 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to day 90Population: 2 participants in arm I withdrew prior to any study assessments. Data were not captured and unavailable for 1 patient in Arm I and 1 patient in Arm II.
The rate of post-operative pulmonary events will be compared between treatment arms using the two-sided CMH exact test.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm I (Botulinum Toxin Type A, Esophagectomy)
n=12 Participants
Patients receive botulinum toxin type A injection IM while undergoing standard minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Botulinum Toxin Type A: Given IM
Esophagectomy: Undergo esophagectomy
Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies
|
Arm II (Esophagectomy)
n=16 Participants
Patients undergo standard minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Esophagectomy: Undergo esophagectomy
Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies
|
|---|---|---|
|
Pulmonary Events Directly Related to Delayed Gastric Emptying as Assessed by Operating Surgeon
Pulmonary Complication
|
3 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Pulmonary Events Directly Related to Delayed Gastric Emptying as Assessed by Operating Surgeon
No Pulmonary Complication
|
9 Participants
|
13 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to day 90Population: The quality of life data were not captured.
Will be compared between treatment arms using the two sided independent-sample, stratified T-test.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
Adverse Events
Arm I (Botulinum Toxin Type A, Esophagectomy)
Arm II (Esophagectomy)
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Arm I (Botulinum Toxin Type A, Esophagectomy)
n=15 participants at risk
Patients receive botulinum toxin type A injection IM while undergoing standard minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Botulinum Toxin Type A: Given IM
Esophagectomy: Undergo esophagectomy
Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies
|
Arm II (Esophagectomy)
n=17 participants at risk
Patients undergo standard minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Esophagectomy: Undergo esophagectomy
Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies
|
|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Postoperative thoracic procedure complication
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Arm I (Botulinum Toxin Type A, Esophagectomy)
n=15 participants at risk
Patients receive botulinum toxin type A injection IM while undergoing standard minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Botulinum Toxin Type A: Given IM
Esophagectomy: Undergo esophagectomy
Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies
|
Arm II (Esophagectomy)
n=17 participants at risk
Patients undergo standard minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Esophagectomy: Undergo esophagectomy
Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies
|
|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Anorexia
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Aspiration
|
13.3%
2/15 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Atelectasis
|
13.3%
2/15 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
|
23.5%
4/17 • Number of events 4 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
|
17.6%
3/17 • Number of events 4 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Bloating
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
|
11.8%
2/17 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Chest pain
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
|
11.8%
2/17 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
26.7%
4/15 • Number of events 4 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
|
35.3%
6/17 • Number of events 8 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
|
29.4%
5/17 • Number of events 5 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
20.0%
3/15 • Number of events 4 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
|
23.5%
4/17 • Number of events 4 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Hypotension
|
13.3%
2/15 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
20.0%
3/15 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
|
23.5%
4/17 • Number of events 4 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleural effusion
|
20.0%
3/15 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
|
17.6%
3/17 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumothorax
|
13.3%
2/15 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
|
29.4%
5/17 • Number of events 5 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Shortness of breath
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
|
17.6%
3/17 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary retention
|
13.3%
2/15 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
|
17.6%
3/17 • Number of events 4 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
|
|
General disorders
Weakness
|
20.0%
3/15 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
|
11.8%
2/17 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected up to 90 days after surgery.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place