High Definition White-Light Colonoscopy vs. Chromoendoscopy for Surveillance of Lynch Syndrome.
NCT ID: NCT02951390
Last Updated: 2018-02-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
280 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-07-31
2017-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Chromoendoscopy to Decrease the Risk of Colorectal Neoplasia in Lynch Syndrome
NCT00905710
NBI Versus Indigo Carmine During Colonoscopy in Lynch Syndrome
NCT02570516
Linked Color Imaging Versus High-definition White Light Endoscopy for the Detection of Polyps in Patients With Lynch Syndrome (LCI-LYNCH)
NCT03344289
Capsule Endoscopy to Screen for Small Bowel Neoplasia in Lynch Syndrome
NCT00898768
Videocapsule Endoscopy in Lynch Syndrome
NCT05704010
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The principal aim is to compare the adenoma detection rate with WLE vs CE. Principal outcome measures will be: 1) adenoma detection rate, defined as the proportion of patients with at least one adenoma in each arm; 2) number of adenomas per patient, defined as the total number of detected adenomas in each arm (HD-WLE or HD-CE) divided by the number of colonoscopies in each arm.
The sample size calculation was determined for a non-inferiority study. Assuming an ADR of 28% with conventional chromoendoscopy in patients with Lynch syndrome, a 15% non-inferiority margin, a one-sided significance level of 0.05 powered at 80% and a 10% of drop-off. Based on these assumptions, it was determined that 122 patients were required for each arm (a total of 244).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
High-definition white-light endoscopy
High-definition white-light endoscopy without indigo carmine instilation
High-definition white-light endoscopy
The intervention is do not perform chromoendoscopy
High-definition chromoendoscopy
High-definition indigo-carmine chromoendoscopy
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
High-definition white-light endoscopy
The intervention is do not perform chromoendoscopy
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Concomitant inflammatory bowel disease
* Inadequate bowel preparation (Boston scale \<2 in any colonic segment)
* Incomplete procedure (without intubation of cecum or ileo-colonic anastomosis)
* Previous colonoscopy in less than one year
* Inability to sign informed consent
18 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Fundacion Clinic per a la Recerca Biomédica
OTHER
Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
María Pellisé
MD. PhD. Consultant
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
María Pellisé, MD. PhD.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
María Pellisé. MD. PhD.
Barcelona, , Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hurlstone DP, Karajeh M, Cross SS, McAlindon ME, Brown S, Hunter MD, Sanders DS. The role of high-magnification-chromoscopic colonoscopy in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer screening: a prospective "back-to-back" endoscopic study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005 Oct;100(10):2167-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.41481.x.
Lecomte T, Cellier C, Meatchi T, Barbier JP, Cugnenc PH, Jian R, Laurent-Puig P, Landi B. Chromoendoscopic colonoscopy for detecting preneoplastic lesions in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005 Sep;3(9):897-902. doi: 10.1016/s1542-3565(05)00403-9.
Stoffel EM, Turgeon DK, Stockwell DH, Zhao L, Normolle DP, Tuck MK, Bresalier RS, Marcon NE, Baron JA, Ruffin MT, Brenner DE, Syngal S; Great Lakes-New England Clinical Epidemiology and Validation Center of the Early Detection Research Network. Missed adenomas during colonoscopic surveillance in individuals with Lynch Syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer). Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2008 Nov;1(6):470-5. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-08-0098.
Huneburg R, Lammert F, Rabe C, Rahner N, Kahl P, Buttner R, Propping P, Sauerbruch T, Lamberti C. Chromocolonoscopy detects more adenomas than white light colonoscopy or narrow band imaging colonoscopy in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer screening. Endoscopy. 2009 Apr;41(4):316-22. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1119628. Epub 2009 Apr 1.
Rahmi G, Lecomte T, Malka D, Maniere T, Le Rhun M, Guimbaud R, Lapalus MG, Le Sidaner A, Moussata D, Caron O, Barbieux JP, Gaudric M, Coron E, Barange K, Ponchon T, Sautereau D, Samaha E, Saurin JC, Chaussade S, Laurent-Puig P, Chatellier G, Cellier C. Impact of chromoscopy on adenoma detection in patients with Lynch syndrome: a prospective, multicenter, blinded, tandem colonoscopy study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015 Feb;110(2):288-98. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.423. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
Rondagh EJ, Gulikers S, Gomez-Garcia EB, Vanlingen Y, Detisch Y, Winkens B, Vasen HF, Masclee AA, Sanduleanu S. Nonpolypoid colorectal neoplasms: a challenge in endoscopic surveillance of patients with Lynch syndrome. Endoscopy. 2013;45(4):257-64. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1326195. Epub 2013 Feb 25.
Jass JR, Stewart SM. Evolution of hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer. Gut. 1992 Jun;33(6):783-6. doi: 10.1136/gut.33.6.783.
Rijcken FE, Hollema H, Kleibeuker JH. Proximal adenomas in hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer are prone to rapid malignant transformation. Gut. 2002 Mar;50(3):382-6. doi: 10.1136/gut.50.3.382.
Lindgren G, Liljegren A, Jaramillo E, Rubio C, Lindblom A. Adenoma prevalence and cancer risk in familial non-polyposis colorectal cancer. Gut. 2002 Feb;50(2):228-34. doi: 10.1136/gut.50.2.228.
Moller P, Seppala T, Bernstein I, Holinski-Feder E, Sala P, Evans DG, Lindblom A, Macrae F, Blanco I, Sijmons R, Jeffries J, Vasen H, Burn J, Nakken S, Hovig E, Rodland EA, Tharmaratnam K, de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel WH, Hill J, Wijnen J, Green K, Lalloo F, Sunde L, Mints M, Bertario L, Pineda M, Navarro M, Morak M, Renkonen-Sinisalo L, Frayling IM, Plazzer JP, Pylvanainen K, Sampson JR, Capella G, Mecklin JP, Moslein G; Mallorca Group (http://mallorca-group.eu). Cancer incidence and survival in Lynch syndrome patients receiving colonoscopic and gynaecological surveillance: first report from the prospective Lynch syndrome database. Gut. 2017 Mar;66(3):464-472. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309675. Epub 2015 Dec 9.
Rex DK, Cutler CS, Lemmel GT, Rahmani EY, Clark DW, Helper DJ, Lehman GA, Mark DG. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology. 1997 Jan;112(1):24-8. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(97)70214-2.
van Rijn JC, Reitsma JB, Stoker J, Bossuyt PM, van Deventer SJ, Dekker E. Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Feb;101(2):343-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00390.x.
Stoffel EM, Mangu PB, Gruber SB, Hamilton SR, Kalady MF, Lau MW, Lu KH, Roach N, Limburg PJ; American Society of Clinical Oncology; European Society of Clinical Oncology. Hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline endorsement of the familial risk-colorectal cancer: European Society for Medical Oncology Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jan 10;33(2):209-17. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.58.1322. Epub 2014 Dec 1.
Balmana J, Balaguer F, Cervantes A, Arnold D; ESMO Guidelines Working Group. Familial risk-colorectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines. Ann Oncol. 2013 Oct;24 Suppl 6:vi73-80. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt209. Epub 2013 Jun 27. No abstract available.
Vasen HF, Abdirahman M, Brohet R, Langers AM, Kleibeuker JH, van Kouwen M, Koornstra JJ, Boot H, Cats A, Dekker E, Sanduleanu S, Poley JW, Hardwick JC, de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel WH, van der Meulen-de Jong AE, Tan TG, Jacobs MA, Mohamed FL, de Boer SY, van de Meeberg PC, Verhulst ML, Salemans JM, van Bentem N, Westerveld BD, Vecht J, Nagengast FM. One to 2-year surveillance intervals reduce risk of colorectal cancer in families with Lynch syndrome. Gastroenterology. 2010 Jun;138(7):2300-6. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.02.053. Epub 2010 Mar 2.
Kaminski MF, Hassan C, Bisschops R, Pohl J, Pellise M, Dekker E, Ignjatovic-Wilson A, Hoffman A, Longcroft-Wheaton G, Heresbach D, Dumonceau JM, East JE. Advanced imaging for detection and differentiation of colorectal neoplasia: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy. 2014 May;46(5):435-49. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1365348. Epub 2014 Mar 17.
Chen SC, Rex DK. Endoscopist can be more powerful than age and male gender in predicting adenoma detection at colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Apr;102(4):856-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.01054.x. Epub 2007 Jan 11.
Kahi CJ, Hewett DG, Norton DL, Eckert GJ, Rex DK. Prevalence and variable detection of proximal colon serrated polyps during screening colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Jan;9(1):42-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2010.09.013. Epub 2010 Oct 1.
Hazewinkel Y, Lopez-Ceron M, East JE, Rastogi A, Pellise M, Nakajima T, van Eeden S, Tytgat KM, Fockens P, Dekker E. Endoscopic features of sessile serrated adenomas: validation by international experts using high-resolution white-light endoscopy and narrow-band imaging. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Jun;77(6):916-24. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.12.018. Epub 2013 Feb 21.
Kahi CJ, Li X, Eckert GJ, Rex DK. High colonoscopic prevalence of proximal colon serrated polyps in average-risk men and women. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Mar;75(3):515-20. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.08.021. Epub 2011 Oct 21.
Rivero-Sanchez L, Arnau-Collell C, Herrero J, Remedios D, Cubiella J, Garcia-Cougil M, Alvarez V, Albeniz E, Calvo P, Gordillo J, Puig I, Lopez-Vicente J, Huerta A, Lopez-Ceron M, Salces I, Penas B, Parejo S, Rodriguez de Santiago E, Herraiz M, Carretero C, Gimeno-Garcia AZ, Saperas E, Alvarez-Urturi C, Moreira R, Rodriguez de Miguel C, Ocana T, Moreira L, Carballal S, Sanchez A, Jung G, Castells A, Llach J, Balaguer F, Pellise M; EndoCAR group from Spanish Gastroenterology Association (AEG) and Spanish Society of Digestive Endoscopy (SEED). White-Light Endoscopy Is Adequate for Lynch Syndrome Surveillance in a Randomized and Noninferiority Study. Gastroenterology. 2020 Mar;158(4):895-904.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.09.003. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HCB/2016/0440
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.