the Influence of Prophylactic and Empirical Anti-fungal Treatment in Severe Sepsis Patients With Perforations

NCT ID: NCT02941068

Last Updated: 2016-10-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

223 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This prospective intended to observe the influence of prophylactic and empirical anti-fungal treatment on Severe Sepsis patients with perforations. With the consent of patients' legal guardian for prophylactic use of antifungal agents, patients were divided into two groups: prophylactic group and Empirical group.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Intra-abdominal perforation is the high risk of fungal infection. The flora in digestive tract would colonize and go to the blood to develop severe bacteria and fungal infection in intra-abdominal perforation and about one-third of patients with gastrointestinal perforations or anastomotic leakages in ICU develop intra-abdominal fungal infection. In particular, the severe sepsis arisen from these infections could further increase the mortality. However, empiric/preemptive treatment in most studies failed to improve the prognosis and few of the studies that addressed the influence of prophylactic anti-fungal treatment in patients with GI Perforation.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Intra-abdominal Perforation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Prophylactic group

Patients would received intravenous fluconazole (loading dose 800 mg, then 400 mg/day) or caspofungin (loading dose 70 mg, then 50 mg/day) if patients had organ failure or renal or liver dysfunction during the immediately surgery. The antifungal treatment would continue for 5 to 7 days.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

fluconazole and caspofungin

Intervention Type DRUG

Empirical group

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

fluconazole and caspofungin

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. age ≥16 years
2. the time between gastrointestinal perforations or anastopmotic leakage(s) after abdominal surgery and entering ICU within 6 hours
3. ICU stay of at least 5 days
4. APACHE Ⅱ score within 24 hours of randomization of 16 or more
5. severe sepsis
6. written informed consent -

Exclusion Criteria

1. documented fungus before gastrointestinal perforations/anastopmotic leakage(s) ongoing antifungal treatment before the study;
2. fluconazole/caspofungin allergy;
3. pregnant of lactating woman;
4. life expectancy of 48 hours or less. -
Minimum Eligible Age

16 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Nanjing PLA General Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Gao Tao

Clinical Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

gao tao, ph.d

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Nanjing PLA General Hospital

cao chun, ph.d

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Nanjing PLA General Hospital

shi jialiang, ph.d

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Nanjing PLA General Hospital

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Montravers P, Dupont H, Gauzit R, Veber B, Auboyer C, Blin P, Hennequin C, Martin C. Candida as a risk factor for mortality in peritonitis. Crit Care Med. 2006 Mar;34(3):646-52. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000201889.39443.D2.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 16505648 (View on PubMed)

Senn L, Eggimann P, Ksontini R, Pascual A, Demartines N, Bille J, Calandra T, Marchetti O. Caspofungin for prevention of intra-abdominal candidiasis in high-risk surgical patients. Intensive Care Med. 2009 May;35(5):903-8. doi: 10.1007/s00134-009-1405-8. Epub 2009 Jan 27.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19172247 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2012NLY032

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Epidemiology of Sepsis in China
NCT02448472 COMPLETED