Clinical Pregnancies After Cryopreservation of Donor Oocytes With an Open or Closed Device
NCT ID: NCT02940106
Last Updated: 2022-01-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
19 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-10-31
2018-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Oocyte Survival After Vitrification in an Open or Closed Device With Closed Storage.
NCT01952184
Effect of Vitrification and Warming Media on Pregnancy Rates in the Context of Oocyte Donation
NCT07288866
Oocyte Cryopreservation by Slow Freezing and Vitrification
NCT01223105
Oocyte Cryopreservation Study (Egg Banking)
NCT02396095
Oocyte Cryopreservation
NCT01232972
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
OTHER
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
closed device
Standard cryopreservation system.
CBSvit device
a different device for oocyte vitrification (with a lower cooling rate)
open device
New cryopreservation system.
Cryotop device
a different device for oocyte vitrification (with a very high cooling rate)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cryotop device
a different device for oocyte vitrification (with a very high cooling rate)
CBSvit device
a different device for oocyte vitrification (with a lower cooling rate)
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
47 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Neelke De Munck
Master in Science
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Neelke De Munck, MSc.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel
Brussels, , Belgium
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
De Munck N, Santos-Ribeiro S, Stoop D, Van de Velde H, Verheyen G. Open versus closed oocyte vitrification in an oocyte donation programme: a prospective randomized sibling oocyte study. Hum Reprod. 2016 Feb;31(2):377-84. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev321. Epub 2016 Jan 2.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2016/245
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.