Effect of Vitrification and Warming Media on Pregnancy Rates in the Context of Oocyte Donation

NCT ID: NCT07288866

Last Updated: 2025-12-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

111 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-07-01

Study Completion Date

2021-08-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Vitrification has become the gold standard for oocyte and embryo cryopreservation. Several commercial kits are available on the market, some are designed for specific developmental stages (e.g. oocytes, zygotes, cleavage-stage embryos or blastocysts) and others are suitable for several stages, therefore termed "universal". Oocytes, cleavage-stage embryos and blastocysts display different levels of resistance to cryopreservation, due to stage-specific properties. While the composition and the exposition protocol of stage specific media are optimized for specific developmental stages, "universal" media display a single composition, therefore exposition protocols should be adapted to each specific developmental stage to ensure optimal survival rates.

The main objective of this study is to determine whether the shift from "oocyte specific" vitrification and warming media to "universal" media has an impact oocyte survival, embryological and clinical outcomes.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A retrospective, monocentric study comparing the clinical and embryological outcomes of 111 oocyte recipient cycles with ICSI from March 2016 to July 2020. Baseline characteristics (donor age and BMI, ovarian stimulation protocol, number of collected oocytes) of the 81 related donations were also analysed.

Two generations of vitrification and warming media were used during this period:

* "Oocyte-specific": RapidVit™ Oocyte and RapidWarm™ Oocyte, Vitrolife
* "Universal": RapidVit™ Omni and RapidWarm™ Omni, Vitrolife Patients were divided in 3 groups according to the combination of the vitrification medium and the warming medium : "specific/specific" (S/S), "specific/universal" (S/U) and "universal/universal" (U/U)..

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Infertility Infertility, Female

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Cryopreservation Cryobiology Vitrification Oocyte donation Cryoprotective Agents

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

S/S - Vitrified and warmed with Oocyte-specific medium

41 oocyte recipient ICSI cycles for which the initial oocyte vitrification procedure was performed with "oocyte- specific" medium RapidVit™ Oocyte (Vitrolife) and the warming procedure was performed with "oocyte-specific" medium RapidWarm™ Oocyte (Vitrolife)

Vitrification and warming media for oocyte vitrification

Intervention Type OTHER

Different combinations of the vitrification and warming media were used for oocyte vitrification procedure in the context of oocyte donation

S/U - Vitrified with Oocyte-specific medium, Warmed with universal medium

39 oocyte recipient ICSI cycles for which the initial oocyte vitrification procedure was performed with "oocyte- specific" medium RapidVit™ Oocyte (Vitrolife) and the warming procedure was performed with "universal" medium RapidWarm™ Omni (Vitrolife)

Vitrification and warming media for oocyte vitrification

Intervention Type OTHER

Different combinations of the vitrification and warming media were used for oocyte vitrification procedure in the context of oocyte donation

U/U - Vitrified and warmed with universal medium

31 oocyte recipient ICSI cycles for which the initial oocyte vitrification procedure was performed with "universal" medium RapidVit™ Oocyte (Vitrolife) and the warming procedure was performed with "universal" medium RapidWarm™ Omni (Vitrolife)

Vitrification and warming media for oocyte vitrification

Intervention Type OTHER

Different combinations of the vitrification and warming media were used for oocyte vitrification procedure in the context of oocyte donation

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Vitrification and warming media for oocyte vitrification

Different combinations of the vitrification and warming media were used for oocyte vitrification procedure in the context of oocyte donation

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Recipient couples undergoing an oocyte donation ICSI cycle from March 2016 to July 2020 for whom the allocated oocytes were vitrified in our center between July 2015 and January 2020

Exclusion Criteria

* Recipient couples undergoing an oocyte donation ICSI cycle from March 2016 to July 2020 for whom the allocated oocytes were vitrified prior to July 2015 or after January 2020.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

43 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Florence Brugnon

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CHU Clermont-Ferrand

Clermont-Ferrand, Auvergne, France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2025_BRUGNON

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id