Effects of Lipid Emulsion on the Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Properties of Metoprolol.
NCT ID: NCT02924454
Last Updated: 2017-04-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
10 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-09-30
2017-03-10
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Influence of Beta Blocker Therapy on the Hemodynamic Response to Inotrope Infusion in Patients With Acute Decompensated Heart Failure
NCT01971944
Metoprolol in Acute Myocardial Infarction. A PK/PD Study
NCT01523054
Effect of BMS-914392 on Pharmacokinetics of Metoprolol
NCT01211821
Examining Genetic Influence on Response to Beta-Blocker Medications in People With Type 2 Diabetes
NCT00925119
Tight Hemodynamic Control in Patients Who Are Chronically on Metoprolol
NCT01404767
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Experimental evidence obtained from animal studies has been indicating a beneficial effect of intravenous lipid emulsion in the treatment of poisoning with various cardio-toxic medications. Based on these findings, the first reported cases on the use of intravenous lipid emulsion in the treatment of human cardiotoxicity caused by poisonings with local anesthetics were published in 2006. Subsequently, a steadily increasing number of case reports concerning the use of intravenous lipid emulsion in resuscitation and treatment of various medications poisonings have been published. Often patients had either cardiac arrest or severe circulatory failure treated according to guidelines for advanced life support prior to lipid emulsion therapy. It is noteworthy that a common observation following bolus infusion of lipid emulsion has been a rapid hemodynamic stabilization of the patient.
Despite an increasing use of intravenous lipid emulsion in the treatment of the poisoned patient, the mechanism behind lipid rescue has not been elucidated. The most widely accepted hypothesis, the "lipid sink/sponge" model, suggests that intravenous lipid emulsion entraps xenobiotics intravascularly, thereby preventing them from reaching sites of toxicity. Additionally, intravenous lipid emulsion may redistribute xenobiotics to areas of higher lipid content. However, other mechanisms of actions of lipid emulsion, supported by observations from animal experiments, are vasoconstrictive and cardio-tonic effects. These effects could be secondary to direct activation of sodium, potassium or calcium channels in the myocardium, or alternatively fatty acid-induced modulation of the metabolic properties of mitochondria. Both mechanisms could result in hemodynamic stabilization. The potential beneficial effects of lipid emulsion on hemodynamic instability beyond the lipid sink have led to the notion that intravenous lipid emulsion could be valuable in the treatment of poisonings with non-lipophilic xenobiotics.
At present, it remains however unclear to what extent the evidence concerning resuscitation of the poisoned patient with lipid emulsion may reflect publication bias. To our knowledge, only one controlled human trial has been conducted at present. In a randomized crossover study, Litonius et al. investigated the effects of lipid emulsion on plasma concentrations of bupivacaine in eight healthy subjects. It was found that lipid emulsion lowered the total plasma concentrations of bupivacaine. This was attributed to an altered distribution and contradicted so the above hypothesis of a lipid sink-mechanism as the fraction of non-lipid bound bupivacaine was unchanged. The mechanism by which lipid emulsion may attenuate the effects of cardio toxic xenobiotics must therefore still be regarded as undecided. This lack of evidence calls for further human studies in order to elucidate the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic consequences of intravenous lipid emulsion. The purpose of this double blind, randomized placebo-controlled crossover clinical trial is to investigate the effects of intravenous lipid emulsion on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of the adrenoceptor antagonist metoprolol in a human model of beta blocker overdose.
The study includes a total of five visits; a screening visit and four trial days. At the screening visit, anthropometric data (weight, height, blood pressure and pulse) is measured. Additionally, blood samples are collected in accordance with exclusion criteria. A spot urine sample measuring the albumin/creatinine ratio is collected and an electrocardiogram (ECG) is recorded to verify normality of heart rhythm and electrical impulses. In addition, an investigator carries out a clinical examination. Based on the clinical examination, urine and blood tests and ECG measurement, the investigator assesses whether the trial participant meet all inclusion criteria and no exclusion criteria.
After screening and inclusion, participants will be invited to four trial days at the trial site. On each day participants are required to be fasting for 10 hours (including water, coffee and tobacco). A peripheral venous line is inserted into each antecubital vein. An arterial catheter connected to a pressure transducer is inserted into the radial artery in the wrist. In randomized order, one of the four interventions are performed (see below). A standard 12 lead ECG is placed on the participant as well as a 5 lead ECG connected to a computer.
At T=0, metoprolol intravenous solution (0.5 mg metoprolol/ml as metoprolol tartrate) or placebo is administered as an intravenous bolus injection. Continuous infusion of metoprolol/placebo is then administered until T=30 minutes. Infusion is halted if heart rate drops below 35 bpm or systolic blood pressure drops below 80 mm Hg, or the participant experiences subjective side effects. Infusion stops at T=30 minutes. Intravenous lipid emulsion (Intralipid 20 %) or saline solution is shortly thereafter administered as an intravenous bolus infusion (1.5 ml/kg) followed by a continuous infusion (infusion rate: 0.25 ml/kg/min). Lipid emulsion/dummy infusion is stopped at T = 30 minutes. One gram of paracetamol administered as a disintegrating tablet dissolved in 50 ml of water is given per os shortly before study start on each day.
Repeated ECG's are recorded and blood is drawn for measurements of routine biochemistry parameters and serum concentrations of metoprolol and paracetamol. A drop of blood is used to test glucose levels using a blood glucose meter. Cardiovascular parameters (heart rate, blood pressure, pulse contour curve/arterial pressure wave) are recorded via the arterial catheter and pressure transducer connected to a computer. The participant is closely monitored on site until T=120 minutes.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
BASIC_SCIENCE
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Metoprolol-Lipid emulsion
intervention 1: metoprolol Intervention 2: intravenous lipid emulsion
metoprolol
One hundred and twenty ml, 0.5 mg metoprolol/ml (as metoprolol tartrate) is administered as an intravenous bolus injection followed by a continuous infusion. Infusion is halted if heart rate drops below 35 bpm or systolic blood pressure drops below 80 mm Hg, or the participant experiences subjective side effects. Infusion stops at T=30 minutes.
intravenous lipid emulsion
Intravenous lipid emulsion 20 % is administered as an intravenous bolus infusion (1.5 ml/kg) followed by continuous infusion (infusion rate: 0.25 ml/kg/min). Lipid emulsion infusion is stopped at T = 30 minutes.
Metoprolol - normal saline
intervention 1: metoprolol intervention 2: Sodium chloride 0.9% solution - lipid emulsion dummy
metoprolol
One hundred and twenty ml, 0.5 mg metoprolol/ml (as metoprolol tartrate) is administered as an intravenous bolus injection followed by a continuous infusion. Infusion is halted if heart rate drops below 35 bpm or systolic blood pressure drops below 80 mm Hg, or the participant experiences subjective side effects. Infusion stops at T=30 minutes.
Sodium chloride 0.9% solution - lipid emulsion dummy
Isotonic 0.9 % sodium chloride solution is administered as an intravenous bolus infusion (1.5 ml/kg), followed by continuous infusion (infusion rate: 0.25 ml/kg/min). Infusion is stopped at T = 30 minutes.
Normal saline-Lipid emulsion
intervention 1: Sodium chloride 0.9% solution - metoprolol dummy intervention 2: intravenous lipid emulsion
intravenous lipid emulsion
Intravenous lipid emulsion 20 % is administered as an intravenous bolus infusion (1.5 ml/kg) followed by continuous infusion (infusion rate: 0.25 ml/kg/min). Lipid emulsion infusion is stopped at T = 30 minutes.
Sodium chloride 0.9% solution - metoprolol dummy
Saline solution is administered as an intravenous bolus injection followed by a continuous infusion to T=30 minutes.
Normal saline-normal saline
intervention 1: Sodium chloride 0.9% solution - metoprolol dummy intervention 2: Sodium chloride 0.9% solution - lipid emulsion dummy
Sodium chloride 0.9% solution - lipid emulsion dummy
Isotonic 0.9 % sodium chloride solution is administered as an intravenous bolus infusion (1.5 ml/kg), followed by continuous infusion (infusion rate: 0.25 ml/kg/min). Infusion is stopped at T = 30 minutes.
Sodium chloride 0.9% solution - metoprolol dummy
Saline solution is administered as an intravenous bolus injection followed by a continuous infusion to T=30 minutes.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
metoprolol
One hundred and twenty ml, 0.5 mg metoprolol/ml (as metoprolol tartrate) is administered as an intravenous bolus injection followed by a continuous infusion. Infusion is halted if heart rate drops below 35 bpm or systolic blood pressure drops below 80 mm Hg, or the participant experiences subjective side effects. Infusion stops at T=30 minutes.
intravenous lipid emulsion
Intravenous lipid emulsion 20 % is administered as an intravenous bolus infusion (1.5 ml/kg) followed by continuous infusion (infusion rate: 0.25 ml/kg/min). Lipid emulsion infusion is stopped at T = 30 minutes.
Sodium chloride 0.9% solution - lipid emulsion dummy
Isotonic 0.9 % sodium chloride solution is administered as an intravenous bolus infusion (1.5 ml/kg), followed by continuous infusion (infusion rate: 0.25 ml/kg/min). Infusion is stopped at T = 30 minutes.
Sodium chloride 0.9% solution - metoprolol dummy
Saline solution is administered as an intravenous bolus injection followed by a continuous infusion to T=30 minutes.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Abnormal urine albumin to creatinine ratio.
* Abnormal function of CYP2D6 metabolism (ultrarapid or slow metabolizer)
* Any heart disease or hypertension
* Sinoatrial block
* Second or third degree atrioventricular block
* Heart failure
* profound bradycardia or hypotension
* sinoatrial node disease
* metabolic acidosis
* untreated pheochromocytoma
* asthma
* chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
* intermittent claudicatio
* diabetes
* Allergy to egg, soy or peanut protein and allergy to any active or inactive ingredients contained in metoprolol (Seloken) or the lipid emulsion (Intralipid)
* Raynaud's syndrome
* Prinzmetal's angina
20 Years
30 Years
MALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mikkel Bring Christensen
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mikkel Bring Christensen
MD, PhD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mikkel B Christensen, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Bispebjerg University Hospital, Copenhagen
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Bispebjerg University Hospital Copenhagen
Copenhagen Northwest, Capital Region of Denmark, Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hoffman RS, Howland MA, Lewin NA, Nelson L, Goldfrank LR, Flomenbaum N, editors. Goldfrank's toxicologic emergencies. Tenth edition. New York: McGraw-Hill Education; 2015. 1882 p.
Picard J, Ward SC, Zumpe R, Meek T, Barlow J, Harrop-Griffiths W. Guidelines and the adoption of 'lipid rescue' therapy for local anaesthetic toxicity. Anaesthesia. 2009 Feb;64(2):122-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05816.x.
Tebbutt S, Harvey M, Nicholson T, Cave G. Intralipid prolongs survival in a rat model of verapamil toxicity. Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Feb;13(2):134-9. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.08.016. Epub 2006 Jan 25.
Di Gregorio G, Schwartz D, Ripper R, Kelly K, Feinstein DL, Minshall RD, Massad M, Ori C, Weinberg GL. Lipid emulsion is superior to vasopressin in a rodent model of resuscitation from toxin-induced cardiac arrest. Crit Care Med. 2009 Mar;37(3):993-9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181961a12.
Weinberg G, Ripper R, Feinstein DL, Hoffman W. Lipid emulsion infusion rescues dogs from bupivacaine-induced cardiac toxicity. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2003 May-Jun;28(3):198-202. doi: 10.1053/rapm.2003.50041.
Weinberg GL, Di Gregorio G, Ripper R, Kelly K, Massad M, Edelman L, Schwartz D, Shah N, Zheng S, Feinstein DL. Resuscitation with lipid versus epinephrine in a rat model of bupivacaine overdose. Anesthesiology. 2008 May;108(5):907-13. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31816d91d2.
Weinberg GL, VadeBoncouer T, Ramaraju GA, Garcia-Amaro MF, Cwik MJ. Pretreatment or resuscitation with a lipid infusion shifts the dose-response to bupivacaine-induced asystole in rats. Anesthesiology. 1998 Apr;88(4):1071-5. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199804000-00028.
Rosenblatt MA, Abel M, Fischer GW, Itzkovich CJ, Eisenkraft JB. Successful use of a 20% lipid emulsion to resuscitate a patient after a presumed bupivacaine-related cardiac arrest. Anesthesiology. 2006 Jul;105(1):217-8. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200607000-00033. No abstract available.
Litz RJ, Popp M, Stehr SN, Koch T. Successful resuscitation of a patient with ropivacaine-induced asystole after axillary plexus block using lipid infusion. Anaesthesia. 2006 Aug;61(8):800-1. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2006.04740.x.
Bet 2: intralipid/lipid emulsion in beta-blocker overdose. Emerg Med J. 2011 Nov;28(11):991-3. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2011-200722.
Blaber MS, Khan JN, Brebner JA, McColm R. "Lipid rescue" for tricyclic antidepressant cardiotoxicity. J Emerg Med. 2012 Sep;43(3):465-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2011.09.010. Epub 2012 Jan 12.
Espinet AJ, Emmerton MT. The successful use of intralipid for treatment of local anesthetic-induced central nervous system toxicity: Some considerations for administration of intralipid in an emergency. Clin J Pain. 2009 Nov-Dec;25(9):808-9. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181af739e.
Finn SD, Uncles DR, Willers J, Sable N. Early treatment of a quetiapine and sertraline overdose with Intralipid. Anaesthesia. 2009 Feb;64(2):191-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05744.x.
Foxall G, McCahon R, Lamb J, Hardman JG, Bedforth NM. Levobupivacaine-induced seizures and cardiovascular collapse treated with Intralipid. Anaesthesia. 2007 May;62(5):516-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.05065.x.
Ludot H, Tharin JY, Belouadah M, Mazoit JX, Malinovsky JM. Successful resuscitation after ropivacaine and lidocaine-induced ventricular arrhythmia following posterior lumbar plexus block in a child. Anesth Analg. 2008 May;106(5):1572-4, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000286176.55971.f0.
Marwick PC, Levin AI, Coetzee AR. Recurrence of cardiotoxicity after lipid rescue from bupivacaine-induced cardiac arrest. Anesth Analg. 2009 Apr;108(4):1344-6. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181979e17.
Shah S, Gopalakrishnan S, Apuya J, Shah S, Martin T. Use of Intralipid in an infant with impending cardiovascular collapse due to local anesthetic toxicity. J Anesth. 2009;23(3):439-41. doi: 10.1007/s00540-009-0754-3. Epub 2009 Aug 14.
Warren JA, Thoma RB, Georgescu A, Shah SJ. Intravenous lipid infusion in the successful resuscitation of local anesthetic-induced cardiovascular collapse after supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Anesth Analg. 2008 May;106(5):1578-80, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000281434.80883.88.
Weinberg GL. Lipid infusion therapy: translation to clinical practice. Anesth Analg. 2008 May;106(5):1340-2. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31816a6c09. No abstract available.
Fettiplace MR, Akpa BS, Ripper R, Zider B, Lang J, Rubinstein I, Weinberg G. Resuscitation with lipid emulsion: dose-dependent recovery from cardiac pharmacotoxicity requires a cardiotonic effect. Anesthesiology. 2014 Apr;120(4):915-25. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000142.
Litonius E, Tarkkila P, Neuvonen PJ, Rosenberg PH. Effect of intravenous lipid emulsion on bupivacaine plasma concentration in humans. Anaesthesia. 2012 Jun;67(6):600-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07056.x. Epub 2012 Feb 21.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Intralipid-Metoprolol
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.