Comparing Re-TACE Versus SABR for Post-prior-TACE Incompletely Regressed HCC: a Randomized Controlled Trial (TASABR)

NCT ID: NCT02921139

Last Updated: 2021-08-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-11-30

Study Completion Date

2022-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Till now, trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is still one of the common modalities in treating hepatocellular carcinoma patients with unresectable intermediate stage. However, residual viable HCC after TACE is not uncommon, leading to a poor overall survival after TACE alone. Recently, stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) has been reported to be potentially useful for curatively managing early-stage HCC in retrospective studies. Thus, conducting a randomized clinical trial to test the role of SABR in eradicating post-TACE residual tumors is therefore encouraged. The present phase-III trial intended to compare clinical outcomes between TACE + SABR and TACE + re-TACE for HCC patients with post-prior-TACE residual tumors.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Developing effective treatment modalities is crucial in managing HCC patients with unresectable intermediate stage. Nowadays, many therapies have been used for treating this group of HCC patients, including TACE. However, residual tumors after TACE are not uncommon. In conventional, re-TACE is recommended for managing residual tumors. However, accumulated overall survival is still poor in consecutive TACEs, leading to a low rate of \<20% in 5 years.

In this regard, radiotherapy has been proved to be effective in managing HCC patients, especially a novel technique named SABR. When compared with conventional-fractionated radiotherapy, SABR demonstrated better treatment responses with fewer side effects in managing primary or metastatic liver tumors. In the literature, phase I and II trials of TACE plus SABR showed excellent local control rates and promising 1- and 2-year survival rates. However, till now, there is no head-to-head comparison between TACE + SABR and consecutive TACEs.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hepatocellular Carcinoma(HCC)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm I

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR)

Intervention Type RADIATION

Patients with HCC after incomplete TACE are randomized to stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR). SABR will be delivered in 5 fractions.The preferred inter-fraction time interval is 48 hours. The entire treatment with 10 days is preferred.

Arm II

Re-transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (re-TACE)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Re-Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (re-TACE)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patients with HCC after incomplete TACE are randomized to further re-TACE.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR)

Patients with HCC after incomplete TACE are randomized to stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR). SABR will be delivered in 5 fractions.The preferred inter-fraction time interval is 48 hours. The entire treatment with 10 days is preferred.

Intervention Type RADIATION

Re-Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (re-TACE)

Patients with HCC after incomplete TACE are randomized to further re-TACE.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) Transarterial Chemoembolization

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient has a) Radiographic enhancing liver lesions with early enhance and delay wash out on triple phase CT or MRI or b) histological confirmation of HCC as determined by the Liver Tumor Board
* Age ≧ 20
* Genders: Both male and female
* Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage A to B
* Child-Pugh A or B
* Unresectable tumors or medically inoperable status or surgery was declined/refused.
* Meets clinical criteria for eligibility for TACE or SABR
* SABR can be applied within 6 weeks of registration
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 0 or 1
* Life expectancy \> 12 weeks
* negative pregnancy
* No prior treatment, except for surgical resection and radiofrequency ablation (RFA)
* Lab :

1. Hemoglobin ≧ 8.0 g/dL(may be post-transfusion if clinically indicated)
2. Total bilirubin ≦ 3.0 mg/dL
3. Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) ≦ 5x institutional upper limit of normal
4. Alanine transaminase (ALT) ≦ 5x institutional upper limit of normal
5. Absolute neutrophil count ≧ 1,000 /μl
6. Platelet count ≧ 20,000/μl (may be post-transfusion if clinically indicated)
7. Prothrombin time-international normalized ratio ≤ 1.7

Exclusion Criteria

* Previous TACE ≥ 2 times
* Prior radiotherapy to the upper abdomen
* Prior invasive malignancy other than primary liver malignancy (except non-melanomatous skin cancer) unless disease free for at least 3 years
* metastatic disease
* cardiac ischemia or stroke within last 6 months
* medical or psychosocial condition unsuitable
* History of sorafenib therapy within 21 days prior
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hualien Tzu Chi General Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Dalin Tzu Chi General Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Shih-Kai Hung, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Chief of Department of Radiation Oncology and Cancer Center, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital

Chiayi City, , Taiwan

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Taiwan

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Shih-Kai Hung, PhD

Role: CONTACT

+886-5-2648000 ext. 75672

Liang-Cheng Chen, MD

Role: CONTACT

+886-978609292

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Liang-Cheng Chen, MD

Role: primary

+886-5-2648000 ext. 71056

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Chang IC, Huang SF, Chen PJ, Chen CL, Chen CL, Wu CC, Tsai CC, Lee PH, Chen MF, Lee CM, Yu HC, Lo GH, Yeh CT, Hong CC, Eng HL, Wang J, Tseng HH, Hsiao CH, Wu HI, Yen TC, Liaw YF. The Hepatitis Viral Status in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma: a Study of 3843 Patients From Taiwan Liver Cancer Network. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Apr;95(15):e3284. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003284.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27082566 (View on PubMed)

Cheng X, Sun P, Hu QG, Song ZF, Xiong J, Zheng QC. Transarterial (chemo)embolization for curative resection of hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analyses. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2014 Jul;140(7):1159-70. doi: 10.1007/s00432-014-1677-4. Epub 2014 Apr 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24752339 (View on PubMed)

Huo YR, Eslick GD. Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Plus Radiotherapy Compared With Chemoembolization Alone for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol. 2015 Sep;1(6):756-65. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.2189.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26182200 (View on PubMed)

Kang JK, Kim MS, Cho CK, Yang KM, Yoo HJ, Kim JH, Bae SH, Jung DH, Kim KB, Lee DH, Han CJ, Kim J, Park SC, Kim YH. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma as a local salvage treatment after incomplete transarterial chemoembolization. Cancer. 2012 Nov 1;118(21):5424-31. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27533. Epub 2012 May 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22570179 (View on PubMed)

Takeda A, Sanuki N, Tsurugai Y, Iwabuchi S, Matsunaga K, Ebinuma H, Imajo K, Aoki Y, Saito H, Kunieda E. Phase 2 study of stereotactic body radiotherapy and optional transarterial chemoembolization for solitary hepatocellular carcinoma not amenable to resection and radiofrequency ablation. Cancer. 2016 Jul 1;122(13):2041-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30008. Epub 2016 Apr 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27062278 (View on PubMed)

Wahl DR, Stenmark MH, Tao Y, Pollom EL, Caoili EM, Lawrence TS, Schipper MJ, Feng M. Outcomes After Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy or Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Feb 10;34(5):452-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.61.4925. Epub 2015 Nov 30.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26628466 (View on PubMed)

Chen LC, Chiou WY, Lin HY, Lee MS, Lo YC, Huang LW, Chang CM, Hung TH, Lin CW, Tseng KC, Liu DW, Hsu FC, Hung SK. Comparing stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) versus re-trans-catheter arterial chemoembolization (re-TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma patients who had incomplete response after initial TACE (TASABR): a randomized controlled trial. BMC Cancer. 2019 Mar 28;19(1):275. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5461-3.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30922261 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

A10502001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.