Hepatectomy Versus Chemoembolization for Resectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Beyond Milan Criteria
NCT ID: NCT02138981
Last Updated: 2018-08-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE4
436 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-05-01
2020-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Different Protocols for Repeated Transarterial Chemoembolization in the Treatment of Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma
NCT02038296
Different Regimens of Transarterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
NCT00493402
Liver Resection Versus Transarterial Chemoembolization for the Treatment of Intermediate-stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma
NCT02755311
Multimodality Therapy for Palliative Resectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Intrahepatic Vessels Invasion
NCT00501813
Radiofrequency Ablation Combined With Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Versus Radiofrequency Ablation Alone for Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma
NCT01415063
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
On the other hand, many authors still believe that hepatic resection is the only potential curative treatment in these patients because it is still feasible to remove all macroscopic tumors safely at surgery. With advances in surgical techniques, more large/multiple HCCs are now resectable, and long-term results have been reported that ranged from 30% to 58% at 5 years; even patients with large bilobar multiple HCC could reach a survival rate of more than 20% at 5 years after hepatic resection.
Until now, there have been only a few studies that compared the outcomes of hepatic resection and TACE in the treatment of multiple HCCs, and these have reported controversial results. Some studies showed that hepatic resection had survival benefi t over TACE, but other studies showed the opposite result ( 11-15 ). Therefore, the investigators performed this prospective study in consecutive patients with large/multiple, and resectable HCCs to compare the outcomes in patients who underwent hepatic resection or TACE as the initial treatment.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Immediate Resection
patients received immediate surgical hepatic resection
Immediate Resection
patients received immediate surgical resection.
Chemoembolization and Response-Dependent Resection
patients underwent transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) as initial treatments, and only patients who showed good response were subjected to surgical resection.
Chemoembolization and Response-Dependent Resection
patients underwent transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) as initial treatments, and only patients who showed good response were subjected to surgical resection.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Chemoembolization and Response-Dependent Resection
patients underwent transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) as initial treatments, and only patients who showed good response were subjected to surgical resection.
Immediate Resection
patients received immediate surgical resection.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* The patient has not been previously treated with surgery, radiation therapy, radiofrequency ablation, percutaneous ethanol or acetic acid injection, or cryoablation.
* The tumor beyound milan criteria.
* The tumor was evaluated to be resectable by a same group of surgeon.
* Patients must have at least one tumor lesion that can be accurately measured according to EASL criteria
* No serious concurrent medical illness
* Not pregnant or breast-feeding patients
* Cirrhotic status of Child-Pugh class A only
* The following laboratory parameters:
* Platelet count ≥ 80,000/µL
* Hemoglobin ≥ 8.5 g/dL
* Total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 mg/dL Serum albumin ≥ 35 g/L
* ASL and AST ≤ 5 x upper limit of normal
* Serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 x upper limit of normal
* INR ≤ 1.5 or PT/APTT within normal limits
* Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) \>1,500/mm3
* Ability to understand the protocol and to agree to and sign a written informed consent document
Exclusion Criteria
* Significant renal impairment (creatinine clearance \< 30 mL/minute) or patients on dialysis
* On anticoagulation or suffering from a known bleeding disorder
* Unstable coronary artery disease or recent MI
* Known history of HIV
* History of organ allograft
* Known or suspected allergy to the investigational agents or any agent given in association with this trial.
* Cardiac ventricular arrhythmias requiring anti-arrhythmic therapy
* Patients with clinically significant gastrointestinal bleeding within 30 days prior to study entry.
* Any other hemorrhage/bleeding event \> CTCAE Grade 3 within 4 weeks of first dose of study drug
* Serious non-healing wound, ulcer, or bone fracture
* Known central nervous system tumors including metastatic brain disease
* severe Arterioportal Shunts or Arteriavein Shunts
18 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
OTHER
Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
OTHER
Kaiping Central Hospital
OTHER
First People's Hospital of Chenzhou
OTHER
Dongguan Shi People's Hospital
UNKNOWN
Sun Yat-sen University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Shi Ming
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ming Shi, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Sun Yat-sen University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Cancer Center Sun Yat-sen University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HCC_S012
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.