Cardiac Involvement in Adult Patients With Fabry Disease; Relation to Enzyme Replacement Therapy
NCT ID: NCT02908724
Last Updated: 2018-10-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
66 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2014-11-30
2016-02-09
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The hypothesis is, that we will not be able to see a significant positive difference in cardiac involvement in those FD patient who received FD specific therapy vs. those that did not.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Fibrosis, Inflammation, Oxygenation of Renal Tissue In FabrY Disease
NCT06325488
Neuropathic Pain and Fabry Disease
NCT00168974
Early Detection and Follow-Up of Patients With Fabry's Disease
NCT04847713
Development and Prevention of Severe Heart Disease in Systemic Sclerosis
NCT01829126
Diagnostic Role of Renal Biopsy in Patients With Fabry Disease
NCT06801288
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
FD specific treatment (ERT, enzyme replacement therapy) have been available since 2001 and patients have been treated with either agalsidase alpha (Replagal®) or agalsidase beta (Fabrazyme®) every other week at recommended doses, 0.2 mg/kg and 1.0 mg/kg, respectively.
Concomitant treatment with cardiovascular medication including angiotensin-converting-enzyme-inhibitor, angiotensin-II-receptor-blocker, acetylsalicylic acid, beta-blocker, calcium-channel-blocker, diuretics and statins, was registered for all patients.
Statistical analysis:
Primarily, we compared the progression of cardiac involvement from baseline to follow-up, according to ERT including subgroup analysis according to gender.
Secondarily, subgroup analysis of the ERT group was performed by separating patients with- and without cardiac disease at baseline, indicated by the presence of myocardial hypertrophy on transthoracic echocardiography (septal thickness or LV posterior wall thickness \>0.9 cm for females and \>1.0 for males), increased cardiac mass (Left ventricular mass index (LVMi) \>95 g/m2 for females and \>115g/m2 for males) or systolic dysfunction (ejection fraction \<55%) in accordance with the guidelines from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Echocardiography (Lang et al., 2005).
In these analyses ERT patients' baseline was defined as the last available examination prior to ERT start and follow-up as the last available examination during ERT. Inclusion in the non-ERT group required that patient had not received ERT at study end. Intra-group comparisons of progression from baseline to follow-up were made by McNemar test (categorical variables) and Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test (continuous variables).
Thirdly, for comparisons between treatment groups, linear mixed models were applied on all available data from continuous variables regarding Sokolow-Lyon voltage-, Cornell product ECG criteria and LVMi as no violations of the assumptions for linear mixed model testing were found in initial analyses. The modelling allows for individual difference at a general level (tracking) as well as individual differences in the progression over time, controlled for gender, age at baseline, treatment duration and current ERT status.
Comparisons of major organ involvement at baseline, gene mutations and alfa-galactosidase A activity between treatment groups, were performed by Chi-squared and Mann-Whitney U tests, respectively.
Data from categorical variables are presented as frequency (percentage), and continuous variables are presented as median \[range\] or estimate (±standard error). Data was analysed using SPSS (version 19.0). All tests were two-sided and a p-value \<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
ERT receiving patients
Patients that were receiving specific treatment for FD (ERT, enzyme replacement therapy, Fabrazyme or Replagal) during the observational time (n= 47).
No interventions assigned to this group
non-ERT receiving patients
Patients that were not receiving specific treatment for FD (ERT, enzyme replacement therapy, Fabrazyme or Replagal) during the observational time (n= 19).
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age at baseline \>18 years
* Baseline cardiac examination performed
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ulla Feldt-Rasmussen
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ulla Feldt-Rasmussen
Professor, Chief physician
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ulla Feldt-Rasmussen, MD,DMSc,Prof
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Department of Medical Endocrinology
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
FAB-ECG
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.