Intragastric pH and Bismuth Effect for H. Pylori Eradication

NCT ID: NCT02894892

Last Updated: 2019-06-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

21 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-11-15

Study Completion Date

2019-02-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Gastric cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide. In Taiwan, there are around 3800 fresh cases annually, with about 5% of total cancers cases. Gastric cancer development is known to follow a multistate process from non-atrophic gastritis, atrophic gastritis, intestinal metaplasia, dysplasia, and carcinoma; H. pylori infection plays the key role of this carcinogenic process. Although H. pylori eradication would result in a marked gastric cancer reduction, treatment success using standard regimens has become more difficult in recent years, and increased antibiotic resistance is considered the most important reason for decreased treatment efficacy. As no specific new medications have been introduced in recent years, novel treatment regimens have been created using different combinations, durations and sequences of available medications. The addition of bismuth improved the cure rates despite a high prevalence of resistance, and resistance of H. pylori to bismuth has not been reported. Bismuth absorption is not required for efficacy in H. pylori treatment regimens, suggesting a local mechanism of action. The mechanisms of bismuth with responsible for rapid destruction of H. pylori within the stomach remain unclear. Knowledge of the mechanism of action of bismuth compounds against H. pylori would be beneficial in the development of improved treatment regimens in this era of declining eradication success rates. We conduct the pilot study to evaluate the bacteria fragments of H. pylori in specimen through electron microscopy after bismuth therapy and provide insight into the mechanism of action of pH on bismuth therapy. We also help to develop optimal H. pylori therapeutic strategies.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Helicobacter Pylori Infection

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

FACTORIAL

Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

(A)Bismuth

(A)Bismuth (120mg/tab) 1 dose prior 1 hr before endoscopy

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

(A)Bismuth

Intervention Type DRUG

(B)Bismuth

(B)Bismuth (120mg/tab) 1 dose in the morning and endoscopy in the afternoon

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

(B)Bismuth

Intervention Type DRUG

(C)Bismuth

(C)Bismuth (120mg/tab) q.i.d. and endoscopy the next day

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

(C)Bismuth

Intervention Type DRUG

(D)Esomeprazole and Bismuth

(D)3 days esomeprazole (40mg/tab) q.i.d. followed by bismuth (120mg/tab) 1 dose prior 1 hr before endoscopy

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

(D)Esomeprazole and Bismuth

Intervention Type DRUG

(E)Esomeprazole and Bismuth

(E)3 days esomeprazole (40mg/tab) q.i.d. followed by bismuth (120mg/tab) 1 dose in the morning and endoscopy in the afternoon

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

(E)Esomeprazole and Bismuth

Intervention Type DRUG

(F)Esomeprazole and Bismuth

(F)3 days esomeprazole (40mg/tab) q.i.d. followed by bismuth (120mg/tab) q.i.d. and endoscopy the next day

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

(F)Esomeprazole and Bismuth

Intervention Type DRUG

(G)Control

(G)These patients underwent endoscopy due to abdominal discomfort or other symptoms and did not have cancers in the digestive tract after series of workup.

Group Type OTHER

(G)Control

Intervention Type OTHER

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

(A)Bismuth

Intervention Type DRUG

(B)Bismuth

Intervention Type DRUG

(C)Bismuth

Intervention Type DRUG

(D)Esomeprazole and Bismuth

Intervention Type DRUG

(E)Esomeprazole and Bismuth

Intervention Type DRUG

(F)Esomeprazole and Bismuth

Intervention Type DRUG

(G)Control

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

(A)Active Comparator-Bismuth (B)Active Comparator-Bismuth (C)Active Comparator-Bismuth (D)Active Comparator-Esomeprazole and Bismuth (E)Active Comparator-Esomeprazole and Bismuth (F)Active Comparator-Esomeprazole and Bismuth (G)Other-Control

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age 20-69
2. Confirmed H. pylori infection by urea breath test or previous histology
3. Scheduled endoscopy
4. Mentally competent to be able to understand the consent form for individuals equal to or older than 20
5. Able to communicate with study staff for individuals equal to or older than 20

Exclusion Criteria

1.History of gastric cancer

Deferral criteria:

1. Having received antibiotic treatment in the previous 15 days
2. Need of time to decide participation
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

69 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

National Taiwan University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Tsung-Hsien Chiang, MD, M.Sc.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

National Taiwan University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

National Taiwan University Hospital

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Taiwan

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

201512127MINC

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Gastric pH in Critically Ill Patients
NCT00590928 COMPLETED PHASE4
Adult Asthmatics and Acid Reflux
NCT00628953 COMPLETED PHASE2