A Safety and Efficacy Study of Lansoprazole in Preventing Aspirin-Induced Gastric and Duodenal Ulcers

NCT ID: NCT00762359

Last Updated: 2012-02-03

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

461 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-05-31

Study Completion Date

2008-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether lansoprazole, once daily (QD), compared to gefarnate, twice daily (BID), is effective in preventing the recurrence of gastric and duodenal ulcers in patients receiving long term treatment with low dosage aspirin.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In Japan, low-dose aspirin is one of the commonly prescribed drugs for inhibiting thrombosis and thrombus formation after angina, myocardial infarction, ischemic cerebrovascular disease, coronary artery by-pass surgery and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in patients. While low-dose aspirin is effective in these cases, its use sometimes causes gastric and duodenal ulcers which can lead to gastrointestinal bleeding, and in worse cases may lead to death.

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of lansoprazole versus gefarnate in patients with a history of gastric or duodenal ulcers receiving daily low dose aspirin therapy.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stomach Ulcer Duodenal Ulcer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Lansoprazole 15 mg QD

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Lansoprazole

Intervention Type DRUG

Lansoprazole 15 mg, capsules, orally, once daily and gefarnate placebo-matching capsules, orally, twice daily for up to 12 to 30 months.

Gefarnate 50 mg BID

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Gefarnate

Intervention Type DRUG

Gefarnate 50 mg, capsules, orally, twice daily and lansoprazole placebo-matching capsules, orally, once daily for up to 12 to 30 months.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Lansoprazole

Lansoprazole 15 mg, capsules, orally, once daily and gefarnate placebo-matching capsules, orally, twice daily for up to 12 to 30 months.

Intervention Type DRUG

Gefarnate

Gefarnate 50 mg, capsules, orally, twice daily and lansoprazole placebo-matching capsules, orally, once daily for up to 12 to 30 months.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

AG-1749 PREVACID® Takepron®

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* The patient was on low-dose aspirin treatment on the day when consent was obtained, and requires the long-term continuous treatment even after treatment with the investigational drug is started.
* The patient was confirmed to have a history of gastric ulcer or duodenal ulcer.

Exclusion Criteria

* Endoscopically confirmed gastric and/or duodenal ulcers on Day 1.
* Endoscopically confirmed active upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage on Day 1.
* Current or past history of aspirin-induced asthma or hypersensitivity to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.
* Past or planned surgery affecting gastric acid secretion.
* Clinically significant hepatic or renal disorder.
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Takeda

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

General Manager

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Takeda

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Matsudo-shi, Chiba, Japan

Site Status

Yotsukaido-shi, Chiba, Japan

Site Status

Imabari, Ehime, Japan

Site Status

Matsuyama, Ehime, Japan

Site Status

Fukui-shi, Fukui, Japan

Site Status

Fukuoka, Fukuoka, Japan

Site Status

Onga-gun, Fukuoka, Japan

Site Status

Gifu, Gifu, Japan

Site Status

Fujioka-shi, Gunma, Japan

Site Status

Maebashi, Gunma, Japan

Site Status

Higashihiroshima-shi, Hiroshima, Japan

Site Status

Hiroshima, Hiroshima, Japan

Site Status

Kure-shi, Hiroshima, Japan

Site Status

Asahikawa-shi, Hokkaido, Japan

Site Status

Hakodate-shi, Hokkaido, Japan

Site Status

Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan

Site Status

Nishinomiya-shi, Hyōgo, Japan

Site Status

Higashiibaraki-gun, Ibaraki, Japan

Site Status

Hitachi-Naka, Ibaraki, Japan

Site Status

Inashiki-gun, Ibaraki, Japan

Site Status

Namegata-shi, Ibaraki, Japan

Site Status

Tsuchiura-shi, Ibaraki, Japan

Site Status

Yuuki-shi, Ibaraki, Japan

Site Status

Hakusan-shi, Ishikawa-ken, Japan

Site Status

Kanazawa, Ishikawa-ken, Japan

Site Status

Komatsu-shi, Ishikawa-ken, Japan

Site Status

Takamatsu, Kagawa-ken, Japan

Site Status

Fujisawa-shi, Kanagawa, Japan

Site Status

Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa, Japan

Site Status

Yamato-shi, Kanagawa, Japan

Site Status

Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan

Site Status

Yokosuka-shi, Kanagawa, Japan

Site Status

Kochi, Kochi, Japan

Site Status

Kumamoto, Kumamoto, Japan

Site Status

Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan

Site Status

Matsusaka-shi, Mie-ken, Japan

Site Status

Shima-shi, Mie-ken, Japan

Site Status

Tsu, Mie-ken, Japan

Site Status

Sendai, Miyagi, Japan

Site Status

Ebino-shi, Miyazaki, Japan

Site Status

Miyazaki, Miyazaki, Japan

Site Status

Jōetsu, Niigata, Japan

Site Status

Niigata, Niigata, Japan

Site Status

Beppu-shi, Ooita, Japan

Site Status

Ōita, Ooita, Japan

Site Status

Ibaraki-shi, Osaka, Japan

Site Status

Matsubara-shi, Osaka, Japan

Site Status

Osaka, Osaka, Japan

Site Status

Takatsuki-shi, Osaka, Japan

Site Status

Hanyuu-shi, Saitama, Japan

Site Status

Ōtsu, Shiga, Japan

Site Status

Hamada-shi, Shimane, Japan

Site Status

Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, Japan

Site Status

Shimotsuke-shi, Tochigi, Japan

Site Status

Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Chuuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Hachioji-shi, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Kiyose-shi, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Toshima-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Higashitagawa-gun, Yamagata, Japan

Site Status

Iwakuni-shi, Yamaguchi, Japan

Site Status

Shimonoseki-shi, Yamaguchi, Japan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Japan

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

070494

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

U1111-1113-9929

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

R100125

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

AG-1749-CCT-351

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.