Long-term Oral Esomeprazole for Prevention of Peptic Ulcer Rebleeding in High-risk Patients
NCT ID: NCT02456012
Last Updated: 2022-02-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
268 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-04-30
2020-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Efficacy of Double Doses of Oral Esomeprazole in Preventing Rebleeding for Patients With Bleeding Peptic Ulcers
NCT01591083
High Dose Esomeprazole Na for Prevention of Rebleeding After Successful Endoscopic Therapy of a Bleeding Peptic Ulcer
NCT01757275
A Double Blind Study Comparing Two Doses of IV Esomeprazole After Successful Endoscopic Therapy
NCT01275937
Comparing Two Doses of IV Esomeprazole After Successful Endoscopic Therapy
NCT04407832
Effect of IV and Oral Esomeprazole in Prevention of Recurrent Bleeding From Peptic Ulcers After Endoscopic Therapy
NCT01142245
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
One investigator generates the random allocation sequence and enrolls the participants and a different investigator assigns participants to interventions. The endoscopists and staff who check hemoglobin levels, hemodynamic status, melena, hematochezia or the aspirates through a nasogastric tube are blinded to the study group allocation. All enrolled patients are included in the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, but patients who are lost to follow-up, discontinued intervention because of adverse events, have a protocol violation or die are excluded from the per-protocol (PP) analysis of the primary endpoint.
The range of co-morbidities evaluated by the Rockall scores include disseminated malignant diseases, liver disease (liver cirrhosis, Child-Pugh A, B, or C), renal disease (end-stage renal disease, chronic kidney disease or acute kidney injury with estimated glomerular filtration rates \<30 ml/min \[a score of 3 for co-morbidity\], or between 30 ml/min and 60 ml/min \[a score of 2 for co-morbidity\]), heart disease (congestive heart failure, New York Heart Association Function I to IV or coronary artery disease). Other serious co-morbidities include lung disease (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pulmonary tuberculosis, pneumonia or empyema), rheumatoid arthritis, sepsis, new onset cerebrovascular accident or recent history of any major surgery (on the thorax, abdomen, central nervous system, long bones or spinal bones) requiring general anesthesia within 14 days before bleeding.
The estimated rebleeding rate within 12 months in the cohort control group is about 15% based on the previous study. The investigators want to be able to detect a difference between the cohort control group and the D group, in which the rebleeding rate is proposed to be 2%, equal to patients with H. pylori ulcers after eradication. The ratio of the patient number in each experiment group (the D group and the S group) to the patient number in the control group is 2:5. With a two-side α value of 0.05 and power of 80% (β=0.20), the total number of patients required is 54 in each experiment group and 135 in the control to detect a difference between the two groups. Assuming the rate of loss follow-up is 10%, 60 patients in each experimental group are enrolled. The investigators use a nominal 0.05 rate of the p value. Data related to baseline characteristics and end points are evaluated using the Student t test, Pearson's χ2 test or Fisher's exact test and the Mann-Whitney U test. In the survival analysis, the log-rank test is used to compare the Kaplan-Meier curves among the three study groups. All tests are two-tailed and p values of less than 0.05 indicate significant differences.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
The D group
After 3-day intravenous 8 mg/h and 16-week oral 40 mg/day esomeprazole treatment, patients receive oral esomeprazole 20 mg twice daily for 36 weeks.
oral esomeprazole 20 mg twice daily
for 36 weeks
The S group
After 3-day intravenous 8 mg/h and 16-week oral 40 mg/day esomeprazole treatment, patients receive oral esomeprazole 20 mg once daily for 36 weeks.
oral esomeprazole 20 mg once daily
for 36 weeks
The C group
The cohort control group includes patients from a previous study who had peptic ulcer bleeding and Rockall scores ≥ 6 but who did not receive esomeprazole or other proton pump inhibitors after 3-day intravenous 8 mg/h and 16-week oral 40 mg/day esomeprazole treatment.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
oral esomeprazole 20 mg twice daily
for 36 weeks
oral esomeprazole 20 mg once daily
for 36 weeks
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
20 Years
95 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hsiu-Chi Cheng
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Hsiu-Chi Cheng
Associate professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Bor-Shyang Sheu, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
National Cheng-Kung University Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Helicobacter pylori study group, National Cheng Kung University Hospital
Tainan City, , Taiwan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Chan HL, Wu JC, Chan FK, Choi CL, Ching JY, Lee YT, Leung WK, Lau JY, Chung SC, Sung JJ. Is non-Helicobacter pylori, non-NSAID peptic ulcer a common cause of upper GI bleeding? A prospective study of 977 patients. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001 Apr;53(4):438-42. doi: 10.1067/mge.2001.112840.
Hung LC, Ching JY, Sung JJ, To KF, Hui AJ, Wong VW, Leong RW, Chan HL, Wu JC, Leung WK, Lee YT, Chung SC, Chan FK. Long-term outcome of Helicobacter pylori-negative idiopathic bleeding ulcers: a prospective cohort study. Gastroenterology. 2005 Jun;128(7):1845-50. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.03.026.
Chow DK, Sung JJ. Non-NSAID non-H. pylori ulcer disease. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2009;23(1):3-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2008.11.010.
Wong GL, Wong VW, Chan Y, Ching JY, Au K, Hui AJ, Lai LH, Chow DK, Siu DK, Lui YN, Wu JC, To KF, Hung LC, Chan HL, Sung JJ, Chan FK. High incidence of mortality and recurrent bleeding in patients with Helicobacter pylori-negative idiopathic bleeding ulcers. Gastroenterology. 2009 Aug;137(2):525-31. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.05.006. Epub 2009 May 13.
Rockall TA, Logan RF, Devlin HB, Northfield TC. Risk assessment after acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Gut. 1996 Mar;38(3):316-21. doi: 10.1136/gut.38.3.316.
Cheng HC, Wu CT, Chang WL, Cheng WC, Chen WY, Sheu BS. Double oral esomeprazole after a 3-day intravenous esomeprazole infusion reduces recurrent peptic ulcer bleeding in high-risk patients: a randomised controlled study. Gut. 2014 Dec;63(12):1864-72. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-306531. Epub 2014 Mar 21.
Marmo R, Koch M, Cipolletta L, Capurso L, Grossi E, Cestari R, Bianco MA, Pandolfo N, Dezi A, Casetti T, Lorenzini I, Germani U, Imperiali G, Stroppa I, Barberani F, Boschetto S, Gigliozzi A, Gatto G, Peri V, Buzzi A, Della Casa D, Di Cicco M, Proietti M, Aragona G, Giangregorio F, Allegretta L, Tronci S, Michetti P, Romagnoli P, Piubello W, Ferri B, Fornari F, Del Piano M, Pagliarulo M, Di Mitri R, Trallori G, Bagnoli S, Frosini G, Macchiarelli R, Sorrentini I, Pietrini L, De Stefano S, Ceglia T, Chiozzini G, Salvagnini M, Di Muzio D, Rotondano G; Italian registry on upper gastrointestinal bleeding (Progetto Nazionale Emorragie Digestive--PNED 2). Predicting mortality in non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeders: validation of the Italian PNED Score and Prospective Comparison with the Rockall Score. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Jun;105(6):1284-91. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.687. Epub 2010 Jan 5.
Chiang HC, Yang EH, Hu HM, Chen WY, Chang WL, Wu CT, Wu DC, Sheu BS, Cheng HC. An extended 36-week oral esomeprazole improved long-term recurrent peptic ulcer bleeding in patients at high risk of rebleeding. BMC Gastroenterol. 2022 Oct 21;22(1):439. doi: 10.1186/s12876-022-02534-0.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
R6IIT
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
A-BR-104-007
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.