Trial Evaluating Endoscopy Competence Among Gastroenterology Trainees in the Era of the Next Accreditation System.
NCT ID: NCT02891304
Last Updated: 2021-08-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
157 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2016-07-31
2018-06-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Aims: To compare the number of procedures necessary to achieve competence in EGD and colonoscopy between trainees receiving learning curve performance feedback every three months in addition to standard feedback versus trainees receiving annual learning curve performance feedback in addition to standard feedback for these endoscopic procedures. To demonstrate the feasibility of development and adoption of a centralized database that would allow program directors and general GI trainees to generate performance reports in relation to national peers to provide real-time targeted performance feedback during training and evaluate trainee and GI fellowship program directors predictors of competence.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Symptoms and Endoscopic Results in Consideration of Pretreatment
NCT00612404
Establishment and Effectiveness Evaluation of a Training System for Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy
NCT06981819
Capsule Gastric Endoscopy for Gastric Disease Screening in Simulated Home Scenarios
NCT06848400
Gastroenterology & Work Related Injuries
NCT04216212
Performance Characteristics and Technical Outcomes of Single-use vs. Reusable Gastroscopes Evaluated in the OR
NCT06581016
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Quarterly Feedback
In addition to each center's traditional endoscopic feedback for trainees, centers/trainees will receive objective feedback every 3-months on trainee overall performance including learning curves on ACE tool performance, performance relative to de-identified anonymous peers on each of the individual skills (e.g. fine tip control), and the global assessment for technical and cognitive skill achievement. For those skills which are not advanced/superior - trainees will additionally receive links to online didactic videos which teach these skills.
Quarterly Feedback
Learning curves received quarterly vs. annually
Annual Feedback
In addition to each center's traditional endoscopic feedback for trainees, centers/trainees will receive learning curves at the end of each training year. Learning curves, relative to de-identified anonymous peers will be provided to program directors annually (June).
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Quarterly Feedback
Learning curves received quarterly vs. annually
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
85 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of California, Los Angeles
OTHER
University of California, Irvine
OTHER
Drexel University College of Medicine
OTHER
University of South Alabama
OTHER
The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
OTHER
Northwestern University
OTHER
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
OTHER
Advocate Lutheran General Hospital
OTHER
Washington University School of Medicine
OTHER
Emory University
OTHER
Rush University
OTHER
Ochsner Health System
OTHER
St. John Providence Health System
OTHER
University of Wisconsin, Madison
OTHER
State University of New York - Downstate Medical Center
OTHER
University of North Carolina
OTHER
University of Miami
OTHER
New York Medical College
OTHER
University of Colorado, Denver
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sachin Wani, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Colorado, Denver
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Han S, Obuch JC, Keswani RN, Hall M, Patel SG, Menard-Katcher P, Simon V, Ezekwe E, Aagaard E, Ahmad A, Alghamdi S, Austin K, Brimhall B, Broy C, Carlin L, Cooley M, Di Palma JA, Duloy AM, Early DS, Ellert S, Gaumnitz EA, Goyal J, Kathpalia P, Day L, El-Nachef N, Kerman D, Lee RH, Lunsford T, Mittal M, Morigeau K, Pietrak S, Piper M, Shah AS, Shapiro AB, Shergill A, Sonnier W, Sorrell C, Vignesh S, Wani S. Effect of individualized feedback on learning curves in EGD and colonoscopy: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Apr;91(4):882-893.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.10.032. Epub 2019 Nov 9.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
16-0782
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.