Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
291 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-08-31
2023-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effectiveness of Dasatinib in Adult Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in China: A Multicenter, Registry Study
NCT02389972
Treating Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) in Chronic Phase (CP) With Dasatinib
NCT02348957
A Study of Dasatinib in Patients With Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia Who Are Resistant or Intolerant of Imatinib Mesylate
NCT00298987
Efficacy and Safety Study of Dasatinib in Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia
NCT00895297
Low-dose Dasatinib as First-line Treatment for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia
NCT03216070
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
* Treatment of adult patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in the chronic phase
* Chronic, accelerated or blast phase CML with resistance or intolerance to prior therapy including imatinib
* Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and lymphoid blast CML with resistance or intolerance to prior therapy Compared to imatinib, dasatinib in CML achieves faster and better responses. Dasatinib is known for its selected toxicities (fluid retention, edema, pleural effusion, and hematological toxicity) requiring dose reductions or treatment interruptions; these toxicities are more frequent in the first two years of treatment. A randomized dose optimization trial for QD dosing vs. BID dosing has demonstrated non-inferiority with regards to efficacy with an improved toxicity profile. In a pilot study, analyzing patients with dasatinib toxicity, a fixed dasatinib weekend holiday allowed safe toxicity management without impairing efficacy. Furthermore the alternated schedule was also able to improve response parameters in patients that had never achieved an acceptable response prior to the onset of dasatinib holiday dosing schedule. The biological rationale for a holiday dosing schedule is that dasatinib has shown an improved cell death of CML cells even after short exposure times; this improved cell death exceeds the killing rate observed with imatinib in vitro. In summary, the reported preclinical and clinical evidence indicates that efficacy seems to require adequate dasatinib Cmax, while low Cmin (five half-lives between doses) does not impair efficacy nor induces drug resistance. It is speculated that a weekend holiday, allowing a better tolerability, would improve patients' drug adherence. The Investigators hypothesize that a dasatinib holiday schedule (5x100mg+2x0mg weekly) compared to a regular dose (7x100mg weekly) will reduce the rate of clinically significant toxicity (e.g., fluid retention, hematological toxicity, musculoskeletal pain) by 20% observed within the first two years of treatment. The Investigators also hypothesize that the dasatinib holiday schedule is non-inferior to dasatinib regular dose in achieving the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) recommended levels of response within the first 24 months.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
A. Standard arm
100mg dasatinib (SPRYCEL®) daily dose (QD) (7x100) (Standard therapy)
dasatinib (SPRYCEL®)
Treatment optimization for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML)
B. Study arm
100mg dasatinib (SPRYCEL®) (QD) weekdays (1-5) only (5x100+2x0) (overall dose reduction per week)
dasatinib (SPRYCEL®)
Treatment optimization for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
dasatinib (SPRYCEL®)
Treatment optimization for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Ph negative cases or patients with variant translocations who are BCR-ABL positive in multiplex PCR4 will be also considered eligible.
* ECOG performance status ≤2.
* Age ≥ 18 years old (no upper age limit is given)
* Serum levels of potassium, magnesium and total calcium within the normal limits (≥LLN \[lower limit of normal\] and ≤ULN \[upper limit of normal\]). Correction of electrolytes' levels with supplements to meet enrolment criteria is allowed.
* AST and ALT ≤2.5 x ULN or 5.0 x ULN if considered due to leukemia
* Alkaline phosphatase ≤2.5 x ULN unless considered due to leukemia
* Total bilirubin ≤1.5 x ULN, except known Gilbert disease
* Serum creatinine ≤2 x ULN
* Written informed consent prior to any study procedures being performed.
For 1st-line patients:
• Pre-treatment with hydroxyurea up to 6 months and imatinib or dasatinib for duration of up to 4 weeks is permitted.
For ≥ 2nd-line patients:
• Patients with treatment failure according to the 2013 ELN Recommendations criteria3 or treatment intolerance as assessed by the investigator after prior treatment with TKIs other than dasatinib (imatinib, nilotinib, bosutinib, ponatinib).
Exclusion Criteria
* Known impaired cardiac function, including any of the following:
* Congenital long QT syndrome
* History of or presence of clinically significant ventricular or atrial tachyarrhythmia
* QTc \>450 msec on screening ECG
* Myocardial infarction within 6 months prior to starting therapy
* Other clinical significant heart disease (e.g. unstable angina pectoris, congestive heart failure)
* Acute or chronic viral hepatitis with moderate or severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh scores \>6), even if controlled
* Other concurrent uncontrolled medical conditions (e.g., active or uncontrolled infections, acute or chronic liver and renal disease) that could cause unacceptable safety risks or compromise compliance with the protocol
* Impaired gastrointestinal function or disease that may alter the absorption of study drug (e.g., ulcerative disease, uncontrolled nausea, vomiting and diarrhea, malabsorption syndrome, small bowel resection or gastric by-pass surgery)
* Concomitant medications known to be strong inducers or inhibitors of the CYP450 isoenzyme CYP3A4
* Patients who have undergone major surgery ≤2 weeks prior to starting study drug or who have not recovered from side effects of such therapy
* Patients who are pregnant or breastfeeding or women of reproductive potential not employing an effective method of birth control. Women of childbearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test within 14 days prior to administration of dasatinib. Post-menopausal women must be amenorrheic for at least 12 months in order to be considered of non-childbearing potential. Male and female patients must agree to employ an effective method of birth control throughout the study and for up to 3 months following discontinuation of study drug
* Known diagnosis of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection (HIV testing is not mandatory)
* Active autoimmune disorder, including autoimmune hepatitis
* Known serious hypersensitivity reactions to dasatinib
* Patients with a history of another primary malignancy that is currently clinically significant or currently requires active intervention
* Patients unwilling or unable to comply with the protocol.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Jena
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Prof. Dr. med. Andreas Hochhaus
Director of the Clinic of Internal Medicine II
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Andreas Hochhaus, Prof.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Jena University Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Uniklinik der RWTH Aachen
Aachen, , Germany
Gesundheitszentrum St. Marien GmbH
Amberg, , Germany
Gemeinschaftspraxis Dres. Klausmann
Aschaffenburg, , Germany
OnkoBer
Berlin, , Germany
Evangelisches Klinikum Bethel gGmbH
Bielefeld, , Germany
Universitätsklinikum Bonn
Bonn, , Germany
Klinikum Bremen-Mitte gGmbH
Bremen, , Germany
Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH
Chemnitz, , Germany
Gemeinschaftspraxis Mohm/Prange-Krex
Dresden, , Germany
Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus an der Technischen Universität Dresden
Dresden, , Germany
Helios St. Johannes Klinik Duisburg
Duisburg, , Germany
Gemeinschaftspraxis Erlangen
Erlangen, , Germany
Universitätsklinikum Essen
Essen, , Germany
Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt
Frankfurt, , Germany
Universitätsklinikum Freiburg
Freiburg im Breisgau, , Germany
Katholisches Karl-Leisner Klinikum
Goch, , Germany
MVZ Onkologische Kooperation Harz
Goslar, , Germany
ConMed GmbH
Göttingen, , Germany
Hämato-Onkologische Gemeinschaftspraxis Halberstadt
Halberstadt, , Germany
Universitätsklinikum Halle/S.
Halle, , Germany
Asklepios MVZ Onkologie
Hamburg, , Germany
MediProjekt GbR
Hanover, , Germany
St. Bernward Krankenhaus Hildesheim
Hildesheim, , Germany
Universitätsklinikum Jena
Jena, , Germany
Institut für med. Dokumentation, Gutachtenstellung, Gesundheitsförderung und Qualitätssicherung GbR
Kaiserslautern, , Germany
Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe gGmbH
Karlsruhe, , Germany
St. Vincentius-Kliniken Karlsruhe
Karlsruhe, , Germany
Onkologische Gemeinschaftspraxis
Kassel, , Germany
Klinikum Kassel
Kassel, , Germany
Städtisches Krankenhaus Kiel GmbH
Kiel, , Germany
Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein
Kiel, , Germany
InVo Institut für Versorgungsforschung
Koblenz, , Germany
MVZ Hämatologie und Onkologie
Krefeld, , Germany
Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis
Kronach, , Germany
Onkologisches Zentrum
Lebach, , Germany
Studienzentrum UnterEms
Leer, , Germany
Universitätsklinikum Leipzig
Leipzig, , Germany
Universitätsmedizin Mannheim
Mannheim, , Germany
Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg GmbH
Marburg, , Germany
Stauferklinikum Schwäbisch Gmünd
Mutlangen, , Germany
Rotkreuzklinikum München
München, , Germany
Gemeinschaftspraxis Hämatologie/ Onkologie
München, , Germany
Universitätsklinikum Münster
Münster, , Germany
Hämatologisch-onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis
Neustadt am Rübenberge, , Germany
Klinikum Passau
Passau, , Germany
Kreiskliniken Reutlingen GmbH
Reutlingen, , Germany
Universitätsmedizin Rostock
Rostock, , Germany
Klinikum Südstadt Rostock
Rostock, , Germany
Hämatologie-Onkologie Stolberg
Stolberg, , Germany
Klinikum Mutterhaus der
Trier, , Germany
Universitätsklinikum Ulm
Ulm, , Germany
Schwarzwald-Baar Klinikum Villingen-Schwenningen GmbH
Villingen-Schwenningen, , Germany
Rems-Murr-Klinik Winnenden
Winnenden, , Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
DasaHIT
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.