A Phase III Study of Dasatinib vs Imatinib in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

NCT ID: NCT00481247

Last Updated: 2017-02-15

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

547 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-09-30

Study Completion Date

2015-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this clinical research study is to compare the confirmed complete cytogenetic response of dasatinib with that of imatinib within 12 months after randomization in patients with newly diagnosed chronic-phase Philadelphia positive chronic myeloid leukemia. The safety of this treatment will also be studied.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Myeloid Leukemia, Chronic

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Dasatinib

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Dasatinib

Intervention Type DRUG

Tablets, oral, dasatinib 50-140 mg once daily (QD)

Imatinib

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Imatinib

Intervention Type DRUG

Tablets, oral, imatinib 200-800 mg, QD

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Dasatinib

Tablets, oral, dasatinib 50-140 mg once daily (QD)

Intervention Type DRUG

Imatinib

Tablets, oral, imatinib 200-800 mg, QD

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Sprycel® BMS-354825

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male or female, aged 18 years and older
* Chronic phase, Philadelphia Chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia (CML)
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status score of 0-2

Exclusion Criteria

* Pleural Effusion
* Uncontrolled cardiovascular disease
* Significant bleeding disorder unrelated to CML
* Prior treatment with interferon/imatinib/dasatinib/anti-CML systemic treatments except anagrelide/hydroxyurea
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Bristol-Myers Squibb

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bristol-Myers Squibb

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Bristol-Myers Squibb

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Molecular Md

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

Local Institution

Capital Federal, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

Local Institution

Capital Federal, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

Local Institution

Waratah, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Local Institution

Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

Local Institution

Greenslopes, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

Local Institution

Perth, Western Australia, Australia

Site Status

Local Institution

Innsbruck, , Austria

Site Status

Local Institution

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Local Institution

Bruges, , Belgium

Site Status

Local Institution

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Local Institution

Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil

Site Status

Local Institution

Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Site Status

Local Institution

Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Local Institution

Jaú, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Local Institution

São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Local Institution

São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Local Institution

Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, Chile

Site Status

Local Institution

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China

Site Status

Local Institution

Fuzhou, Fujian, China

Site Status

Local Institution

Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China

Site Status

Local Institution

Tianjin, Tianjin Municipality, China

Site Status

Local Institution

Colombia, Bogota D.C., Colombia

Site Status

Local Institution

Bogotá, , Colombia

Site Status

Local Institution

Brno, , Czechia

Site Status

Local Institution

Hradec Králové, , Czechia

Site Status

Local Institution

Olomouc, , Czechia

Site Status

Local Institution

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Local Institution

Aarhus, , Denmark

Site Status

Local Institution

Nantes, Cedex 1, France

Site Status

Local Institution

Brest, , France

Site Status

Local Institution

Lille, , France

Site Status

Local Institution

Limoges, , France

Site Status

Local Institution

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

Local Institution

Paris, , France

Site Status

Local Institution

Paris, , France

Site Status

Local Institution

Pierre-Bénite, , France

Site Status

Local Institution

Poitiers, , France

Site Status

Local Institution

Rennes, , France

Site Status

Local Institution

Strasbourg, , France

Site Status

Local Institution

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

Local Institution

Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, , France

Site Status

Local Institution

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Local Institution

Rostock, , Germany

Site Status

Local Institution

Tübingen, , Germany

Site Status

Local Institution

Ulm, , Germany

Site Status

Local Institution

Thessaloniki, , Greece

Site Status

Local Institution

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Local Institution

Debrecen, , Hungary

Site Status

Local Institution

Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India

Site Status

Local Institution

Ahmedabad, , India

Site Status

Local Institution

Kochi, , India

Site Status

Local Institution

Mumbai, , India

Site Status

Local Institution

Mumbai, , India

Site Status

Local Institution

Mumbai, , India

Site Status

Local Institution

Trivandrum, , India

Site Status

Local Institution

Bologna, , Italy

Site Status

Local Institution

Catania, , Italy

Site Status

Local Institution

Monza (mb), , Italy

Site Status

Local Institution

Orbassano (to), , Italy

Site Status

Local Institution

Pavia, , Italy

Site Status

Local Institution

Roma, , Italy

Site Status

Local Institution

Roma, , Italy

Site Status

Local Institution

Nagoya, Aichi-ken, Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Kamogawa-shi, Chiba, Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Fukuoka, Fukuoka, Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Morioka, Iwate, Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Kagoshima, Kagoshima-ken, Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Sendai, Miyagi, Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Okayama, Okayama-ken, Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Osaka, Osaka, Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Local Institution

Mexico City, Mexico City, Mexico

Site Status

Local Institution

Mexico City, Mexico City, Mexico

Site Status

Local Institution

Mexico, D. F., Mexico City, Mexico

Site Status

Local Institution

Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico

Site Status

Local Institution

Culiacán, Sinaloa, Mexico

Site Status

Local Institution

Groningen, , Netherlands

Site Status

Local Institution

Nijmegen, , Netherlands

Site Status

Local Institution

Arequipa, Arequipa, Peru

Site Status

Local Institution

Lima, Lima Province, Peru

Site Status

Local Institution

Lima, Lima Province, Peru

Site Status

Local Institution

Chorzów, , Poland

Site Status

Local Institution

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Local Institution

Lodz, , Poland

Site Status

Local Institution

Poznan, , Poland

Site Status

Local Institution

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Local Institution

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Local Institution

Rostov-on-Don, , Russia

Site Status

Local Institution

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Local Institution

Singapore, , Singapore

Site Status

Local Institution

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Local Institution

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Local Institution

A Coruña, , Spain

Site Status

Local Institution

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Local Institution

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Local Institution

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Local Institution

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Local Institution

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Local Institution

Málaga, , Spain

Site Status

Local Institution

Oviedo, , Spain

Site Status

Local Institution

Salamanca, , Spain

Site Status

Local Institution

Valencia, , Spain

Site Status

Local Institution

Ankara, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Local Institution

Kayseri, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Argentina Australia Austria Belgium Brazil Chile China Colombia Czechia Denmark France Germany Greece Hungary India Italy Japan Mexico Netherlands Peru Poland Russia Singapore South Korea Spain Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Glauche I, Kuhn M, Baldow C, Schulze P, Rothe T, Liebscher H, Roy A, Wang X, Roeder I. Quantitative prediction of long-term molecular response in TKI-treated CML - Lessons from an imatinib versus dasatinib comparison. Sci Rep. 2018 Aug 17;8(1):12330. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-29923-4.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30120281 (View on PubMed)

Hughes TP, Saglio G, Quintas-Cardama A, Mauro MJ, Kim DW, Lipton JH, Bradley-Garelik MB, Ukropec J, Hochhaus A. BCR-ABL1 mutation development during first-line treatment with dasatinib or imatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase. Leukemia. 2015 Sep;29(9):1832-8. doi: 10.1038/leu.2015.168. Epub 2015 Jun 29.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26118315 (View on PubMed)

Fujisawa S, Nakamae H, Ogura M, Ishizawa K, Taniwaki M, Utsunomiya A, Matsue K, Takamatsu Y, Usuki K, Tanimoto M, Ishida Y, Akiyama H, Onishi S. Efficacy and safety of dasatinib versus imatinib in Japanese patients with newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP): Subset analysis of the DASISION trial with 2-year follow-up. Int J Hematol. 2014 Feb;99(2):141-53. doi: 10.1007/s12185-013-1470-1. Epub 2013 Dec 20.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24357015 (View on PubMed)

Jabbour E, Kantarjian HM, Saglio G, Steegmann JL, Shah NP, Boque C, Chuah C, Pavlovsky C, Mayer J, Cortes J, Baccarani M, Kim DW, Bradley-Garelik MB, Mohamed H, Wildgust M, Hochhaus A. Early response with dasatinib or imatinib in chronic myeloid leukemia: 3-year follow-up from a randomized phase 3 trial (DASISION). Blood. 2014 Jan 23;123(4):494-500. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-06-511592. Epub 2013 Dec 5.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24311723 (View on PubMed)

Kantarjian HM, Shah NP, Cortes JE, Baccarani M, Agarwal MB, Undurraga MS, Wang J, Ipina JJ, Kim DW, Ogura M, Pavlovsky C, Junghanss C, Milone JH, Nicolini FE, Robak T, Van Droogenbroeck J, Vellenga E, Bradley-Garelik MB, Zhu C, Hochhaus A. Dasatinib or imatinib in newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: 2-year follow-up from a randomized phase 3 trial (DASISION). Blood. 2012 Feb 2;119(5):1123-9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-08-376087. Epub 2011 Dec 9.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 22160483 (View on PubMed)

Kantarjian H, Shah NP, Hochhaus A, Cortes J, Shah S, Ayala M, Moiraghi B, Shen Z, Mayer J, Pasquini R, Nakamae H, Huguet F, Boque C, Chuah C, Bleickardt E, Bradley-Garelik MB, Zhu C, Szatrowski T, Shapiro D, Baccarani M. Dasatinib versus imatinib in newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2010 Jun 17;362(24):2260-70. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1002315. Epub 2010 Jun 5.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 20525995 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2006-005712-27

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CA180-056

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.