A Study of Dasatinib vs. High-Dose Imatinib (600 mg) in Patients With Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) Who Failed to Achieve Complete Cytogenetic Response After 3-18 Months of Imatinib Therapy

NCT ID: NCT00362466

Last Updated: 2009-11-20

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

3 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-04-30

Study Completion Date

2008-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this clinical research study is to compare the rate of complete cytogenetic response of dasatinib to imatinib therapy at 6 months after randomization in chronic phase CML patients. The safety of this treatment will also be studied.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Leukemia

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Leukemia (chronic myeloid leukemia - chronic phase)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

A

50-180 mg once daily (QD)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Dasatinib

Intervention Type DRUG

Tablets, Oral, Once daily, 5-7 years

B

200-800 mg QD

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Imatinib

Intervention Type DRUG

Tablets, Oral, Once daily, 5-7 years

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Dasatinib

Tablets, Oral, Once daily, 5-7 years

Intervention Type DRUG

Imatinib

Tablets, Oral, Once daily, 5-7 years

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Sprycel®

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Men and women ≥18 years diagnosed with Chronic Phase Philadelphia chromosome positive (CP Ph+) CML who have failed to achieve CCyR after 3-18 months of therapy with imatinib 400 mg
* Treatment initiation with imatinib 400 mg within 6 months of initial CML diagnosis
* Able to tolerate chronic administration of imatinib at the highest dose (400-600 mg) the subject has received in the past
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) 0-2
* Adequate hepatic and renal function

Exclusion Criteria

* Eligible and willing to undergo immediate autologous/allogeneic stem cell transplant
* Previous diagnosis of accelerated/blast crisis CML
* Subjects with clonal evolution in Ph+ cells observed in ≥2 metaphases
* Previous documentation of T315I mutation
* Uncontrolled or significant cardiovascular disease
* Serious uncontrolled medical disorder/active infection
* History of significant bleeding disorder unrelated to CML
* Intolerance to imatinib ≥400 mg
* Concurrent malignancies other than CML
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Bristol-Myers Squibb

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Bristol-Myers Squibb

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bristol-Myers Squibb

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Bristol-Myers Squibb

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Dr. Marshall Schreeder

Huntsville, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Alhambra, California, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Anaheim, California, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Beverly Hills, California, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Fullerton, California, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

La Jolla, California, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

La Verne, California, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Long Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Northridge, California, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Oxnard, California, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Redondo Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Santa Maria, California, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Stanford, California, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Aurora, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Orlando

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Kansas City, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Hazard, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Hackensack, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Buffalo, New York, United States

Site Status

New York Presbyterian Hospital

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

New York Medical College

Valhalla, New York, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Baltimore, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Santee Hematology/Oncology

Sumter, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CA180-044

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id