Filgotinib in Combination With Methotrexate in Adults With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Have an Inadequate Response to Methotrexate

NCT ID: NCT02889796

Last Updated: 2021-06-09

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

1759 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-08-30

Study Completion Date

2019-06-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effects of filgotinib versus placebo for the treatment of signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) as measured by the percentage of participants achieving an American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement response (ACR20) at Week 12.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Filgotinib 200 mg

Filgotinib 200 mg + placebo to match filgotinib 100 mg + placebo to match adalimumab 40 mg in addition to a stable dose of methotrexate (MTX)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Filgotinib

Intervention Type DRUG

200 mg or 100 mg tablet(s) administered orally once daily

Placebo to match filgotinib

Intervention Type DRUG

Tablet(s) administered orally once daily

Placebo to match adalimumab

Intervention Type DRUG

Administered via subcutaneous injection once every two weeks

MTX

Intervention Type DRUG

Commercially sourced tablet(s) administered orally

Filgotinib 100 mg

Filgotinib 100 mg + placebo to match filgotinib 200 mg + placebo to match adalimumab 40 mg in addition to a stable dose of MTX

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Filgotinib

Intervention Type DRUG

200 mg or 100 mg tablet(s) administered orally once daily

Placebo to match filgotinib

Intervention Type DRUG

Tablet(s) administered orally once daily

Placebo to match adalimumab

Intervention Type DRUG

Administered via subcutaneous injection once every two weeks

MTX

Intervention Type DRUG

Commercially sourced tablet(s) administered orally

Adalimumab

Placebo to match filgotinib 200 mg + placebo to match filgotinib 100 mg + adalimumab 40 mg in addition to a stable dose of MTX

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Placebo to match filgotinib

Intervention Type DRUG

Tablet(s) administered orally once daily

Adalimumab

Intervention Type DRUG

40 mg administered via subcutaneous injection once every two weeks

MTX

Intervention Type DRUG

Commercially sourced tablet(s) administered orally

Placebo to Filgotinib 200 mg

Placebo to match filgotinib 200 mg + placebo to match filgotinib 100 mg + placebo to match adalimumab 40 mg in addition to a stable dose of MTX for up to 24 weeks. After 24 weeks, participants will be rerandomized to filgotinib 200 mg to receive filgotinib 200 mg + placebo to match filgotinib 100 mg + placebo to match adalimumab 40 mg in addition to a stable dose of MTX.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Filgotinib

Intervention Type DRUG

200 mg or 100 mg tablet(s) administered orally once daily

Placebo to match filgotinib

Intervention Type DRUG

Tablet(s) administered orally once daily

Placebo to match adalimumab

Intervention Type DRUG

Administered via subcutaneous injection once every two weeks

MTX

Intervention Type DRUG

Commercially sourced tablet(s) administered orally

Placebo to Filgotinib 100 mg

Placebo to match filgotinib 200 mg + placebo to match filgotinib 100 mg + placebo to match adalimumab 40 mg in addition to a stable dose of MTX for up to 24 weeks. After 24 weeks, participants will be rerandomized to filgotinib 100 mg to receive filgotinib 100 mg + placebo to match filgotinib 200 mg + placebo to match adalimumab 40 mg in addition to a stable dose of MTX.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Filgotinib

Intervention Type DRUG

200 mg or 100 mg tablet(s) administered orally once daily

Placebo to match filgotinib

Intervention Type DRUG

Tablet(s) administered orally once daily

Placebo to match adalimumab

Intervention Type DRUG

Administered via subcutaneous injection once every two weeks

MTX

Intervention Type DRUG

Commercially sourced tablet(s) administered orally

Placebo Never Received Filgotinib

Placebo to match filgotinib 200 mg + placebo to match filgotinib 100 mg + placebo to match adalimumab 40 mg in addition to a stable dose of MTX for up to 24 weeks.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo to match filgotinib

Intervention Type DRUG

Tablet(s) administered orally once daily

Placebo to match adalimumab

Intervention Type DRUG

Administered via subcutaneous injection once every two weeks

MTX

Intervention Type DRUG

Commercially sourced tablet(s) administered orally

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Filgotinib

200 mg or 100 mg tablet(s) administered orally once daily

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo to match filgotinib

Tablet(s) administered orally once daily

Intervention Type DRUG

Adalimumab

40 mg administered via subcutaneous injection once every two weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo to match adalimumab

Administered via subcutaneous injection once every two weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

MTX

Commercially sourced tablet(s) administered orally

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

GS-6034

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Have a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) \[2010 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) criteria\] , and are ACR functional class I-III.
* Have ≥ 6 swollen joints (from a swollen joint count based on 66 joints (SJC66)) and ≥ 6 tender joints (from a tender joint count based on 68 joints (TJC68)) at both screening and Day 1.
* Ongoing treatment with a stable dose of MTX

Exclusion Criteria

* Previous treatment with any janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Galapagos NV

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Gilead Sciences

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Gilead Study Director

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Gilead Sciences

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Huntsville, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Covina, California, United States

Site Status

Hemet, California, United States

Site Status

La Jolla, California, United States

Site Status

Palm Desert, California, United States

Site Status

Upland, California, United States

Site Status

Victorville, California, United States

Site Status

Whittier, California, United States

Site Status

Clearwater, Florida, United States

Site Status

DeBary, Florida, United States

Site Status

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami Lakes, Florida, United States

Site Status

New Port Richey, Florida, United States

Site Status

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Plantation, Florida, United States

Site Status

Kansas City, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Wichita, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Elizabethtown, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Cumberland, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Hagerstown, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Wheaton, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Saint Clair Shores, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Eagan, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Hattiesburg, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Tupelo, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Toms River, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Salisbury, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Duncansville, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Wyomissing, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Columbia, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Orangeburg, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Memphis, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Beaumont, Texas, United States

Site Status

Corpus Christi, Texas, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Mesquite, Texas, United States

Site Status

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Webster, Texas, United States

Site Status

Buenos Aires, , Argentina

Site Status

Caba, , Argentina

Site Status

Mendoza, , Argentina

Site Status

Quilmes, , Argentina

Site Status

San Fernando, , Argentina

Site Status

San Juan, , Argentina

Site Status

San Miguel de Tucumán, , Argentina

Site Status

Victoria Park, Western Australia, Australia

Site Status

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Genk, , Belgium

Site Status

Merksem, , Belgium

Site Status

Dobrich, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Haskovo, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Plovdiv, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Varna, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Vidin, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Trois-Rivières, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Prague, Prague, Czechia

Site Status

Brno, , Czechia

Site Status

Ostrava, , Czechia

Site Status

Ostrava-Poruba, , Czechia

Site Status

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Uherské Hradiště, , Czechia

Site Status

Frankfurt A Main, , Germany

Site Status

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Ratingen, , Germany

Site Status

Hong Kong, , Hong Kong

Site Status

Kalocsa, Bács-Kiskun county, Hungary

Site Status

Szentes, Csongrád megye, Hungary

Site Status

Székesfehérvár, Fejér, Hungary

Site Status

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Eger, , Hungary

Site Status

Ahmedabad, , India

Site Status

Bangalore, , India

Site Status

Chennai, , India

Site Status

Delhi, , India

Site Status

Gurgaon, , India

Site Status

Hyderabad, , India

Site Status

Jaipur, , India

Site Status

Kolkata, , India

Site Status

Lucknow, , India

Site Status

Mangalore, , India

Site Status

Nagpur, , India

Site Status

New Delhi, , India

Site Status

Pune, , India

Site Status

Secunderabad, , India

Site Status

Srikakulam, , India

Site Status

Surat, , India

Site Status

Vadodara, , India

Site Status

Visakhapatnam, , India

Site Status

Dublin, , Ireland

Site Status

Haifa, , Israel

Site Status

Tel Aviv, , Israel

Site Status

Tel Litwinsky, , Israel

Site Status

Bologna, , Italy

Site Status

Catania, , Italy

Site Status

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

Chiba, , Japan

Site Status

Fukuoka, , Japan

Site Status

Hiroshima, , Japan

Site Status

Iizuka-shi, , Japan

Site Status

Iruma-gun, , Japan

Site Status

Izumo, , Japan

Site Status

Kagoshima, , Japan

Site Status

Katō, , Japan

Site Status

Kitakyushu-shi, , Japan

Site Status

Kobe, , Japan

Site Status

Kumamoto, , Japan

Site Status

Kurume-shi, , Japan

Site Status

Kyoto, , Japan

Site Status

Miyazaki, , Japan

Site Status

Morioka, , Japan

Site Status

Nagaoka, , Japan

Site Status

Nagasaki, , Japan

Site Status

Nagoya, , Japan

Site Status

Narashino, , Japan

Site Status

Nishinomiya, , Japan

Site Status

Ōita, , Japan

Site Status

Sanuki-shi, , Japan

Site Status

Sapporo, , Japan

Site Status

Sasebo-shi, , Japan

Site Status

Sayama-shi, , Japan

Site Status

Shibata, , Japan

Site Status

Shinjuku-Ku, , Japan

Site Status

Shizuoka, , Japan

Site Status

Suita-shi, , Japan

Site Status

Takaoka, , Japan

Site Status

Takasaki-shi, , Japan

Site Status

Tokorozawa, , Japan

Site Status

Tokyo, , Japan

Site Status

Tsukuba, , Japan

Site Status

Wakayama, , Japan

Site Status

Yokohama, , Japan

Site Status

Mérida, Yucatán, Mexico

Site Status

Chihuahua City, , Mexico

Site Status

Distrito Federal, , Mexico

Site Status

Mexico City, , Mexico

Site Status

Mérida, , Mexico

Site Status

Monterrey, , Mexico

Site Status

Morelia, , Mexico

Site Status

Leiden, , Netherlands

Site Status

Papatoetoe, Auckland, New Zealand

Site Status

Auckland, , New Zealand

Site Status

Hamilton, , New Zealand

Site Status

Newtown, , New Zealand

Site Status

Timaru, , New Zealand

Site Status

Wroclaw, Lower Silesian Voivodeship, Poland

Site Status

Bialystok, , Poland

Site Status

Bydgoszcz, , Poland

Site Status

Bytom, , Poland

Site Status

Elblag, , Poland

Site Status

Gdynia, , Poland

Site Status

Kartuzy, , Poland

Site Status

Katowice, , Poland

Site Status

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Nowa Sól, , Poland

Site Status

Poznan, , Poland

Site Status

Tomaszów Lubelski, , Poland

Site Status

Torun, , Poland

Site Status

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Oradea, Bihor County, Romania

Site Status

Bucharest, București, Romania

Site Status

Bacau, , Romania

Site Status

Târgu Mureş, , Romania

Site Status

Barnaul, , Russia

Site Status

Chelyabinsk, , Russia

Site Status

Kazan', , Russia

Site Status

Kemerovo, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Nizhny Novgorod, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Saratov, , Russia

Site Status

Vladimir, , Russia

Site Status

Yaroslavl, , Russia

Site Status

Belgrade, , Serbia

Site Status

Niška Banja, , Serbia

Site Status

Bratislava, , Slovakia

Site Status

Prievidza, , Slovakia

Site Status

Rimavská Sobota, , Slovakia

Site Status

Topoľčany, , Slovakia

Site Status

Cape Town, , South Africa

Site Status

Durban, , South Africa

Site Status

Johannesburg, , South Africa

Site Status

Anyang-si, , South Korea

Site Status

Busan, , South Korea

Site Status

Daegu, , South Korea

Site Status

Daejeon, , South Korea

Site Status

Gwangju, , South Korea

Site Status

Incheon, , South Korea

Site Status

Jeonju, , South Korea

Site Status

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

A Coruña, , Spain

Site Status

Málaga, , Spain

Site Status

Sabadell, , Spain

Site Status

Santiago de Compostela, , Spain

Site Status

Valencia, , Spain

Site Status

Changhua, , Taiwan

Site Status

Kaohsiung City, , Taiwan

Site Status

Keelung, , Taiwan

Site Status

Taichung, , Taiwan

Site Status

Tainan City, , Taiwan

Site Status

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

Taoyuan District, , Taiwan

Site Status

Bangkok, , Thailand

Site Status

Chiang Mai, , Thailand

Site Status

Songkhla, , Thailand

Site Status

Dnipro, , Ukraine

Site Status

Kharkiv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Kherson, , Ukraine

Site Status

Kiev, , Ukraine

Site Status

Kyiv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Lutsk, , Ukraine

Site Status

Lviv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Odesa, , Ukraine

Site Status

Vinnytsia, , Ukraine

Site Status

Zaporizhzhya, , Ukraine

Site Status

Poole, England, United Kingdom

Site Status

Doncaster, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Edinburgh, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Newcastle upon Tyne, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Warrington, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Argentina Australia Belgium Bulgaria Canada Czechia Germany Hong Kong Hungary India Ireland Israel Italy Japan Mexico Netherlands New Zealand Poland Romania Russia Serbia Slovakia South Africa South Korea Spain Taiwan Thailand Ukraine United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Combe B, Kivitz A, Tanaka Y, van der Heijde D, Matzkies F, Bartok B, et al. Efficacy and safety of filgotinib for patients with rheumatoid arthritis with inadequate response to methotrexate: FINCH 1 primary outcome results. Ann Rheum Dis 2019; 78 (supplement 2):A77.

Reference Type RESULT

Tanaka Y, Atsumi T, Aletaha D, Schulze-Koops H, Fukada H, Watson C, Takeuchi T. The Uncoupling of Disease Activity from Joint Structural Progression in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated with Filgotinib. Rheumatol Ther. 2025 Feb;12(1):53-66. doi: 10.1007/s40744-024-00725-7. Epub 2024 Nov 26.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39592547 (View on PubMed)

Buch MH, Walker D, Edwards CJ, Barry J, Akroyd L, Ekoka Omoruyi EV, Taylor PC. Efficacy and safety of filgotinib in patients with moderately active rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2025 Apr 1;64(4):1661-1671. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keae486.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39331638 (View on PubMed)

Taylor PC, Downie B, Han L, Hawtin R, Hertz A, Moots RJ, Takeuchi T. Patients with High Baseline Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Exhibit Better Response to Filgotinib as Treatment for Rheumatoid Arthritis. Rheumatol Ther. 2024 Oct;11(5):1383-1392. doi: 10.1007/s40744-024-00695-w. Epub 2024 Jul 10.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38985247 (View on PubMed)

Curtis JR, Emery P, Downie B, Zhong Y, Liu J, Han L, Hawtin RE, Burmester GR. Filgotinib Demonstrates Efficacy in Rheumatoid Arthritis Independent of Smoking Status: Post Hoc Analysis of Phase 3 Trials and Claims-Based Analysis. Rheumatol Ther. 2024 Feb;11(1):177-189. doi: 10.1007/s40744-023-00619-0. Epub 2023 Dec 6.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38057656 (View on PubMed)

Balsa A, Wassenberg S, Tanaka Y, Tournadre A, Orzechowski HD, Rajendran V, Lendl U, Stiers PJ, Watson C, Caporali R, Galloway J, Verschueren P. Effect of Filgotinib on Body Mass Index (BMI) and Effect of Baseline BMI on the Efficacy and Safety of Filgotinib in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Rheumatol Ther. 2023 Dec;10(6):1555-1574. doi: 10.1007/s40744-023-00599-1. Epub 2023 Sep 25.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37747626 (View on PubMed)

Tanaka Y, Taylor PC, Elboudwarej E, Hertz A, Shao X, Malkov VA, Matsushima H, Emoto K, Downie B, Takeuchi T. Filgotinib Modulates Inflammation-Associated Peripheral Blood Protein Biomarkers in Adults with Active Rheumatoid Arthritis and Prior Inadequate Response to Methotrexate. Rheumatol Ther. 2023 Oct;10(5):1335-1348. doi: 10.1007/s40744-023-00583-9. Epub 2023 Jul 25.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37490202 (View on PubMed)

Tanaka Y, Atsumi T, Aletaha D, Bartok B, Pechonkina A, Han L, Emoto K, Kano S, Rajendran V, Takeuchi T. Benefit of Filgotinib, a JAK1 Preferential Inhibitor, in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients with Previous Rapid Radiographic Progression: Post Hoc Analysis of Two Trials. Rheumatol Ther. 2023 Feb;10(1):161-185. doi: 10.1007/s40744-022-00503-3. Epub 2022 Nov 3.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36327094 (View on PubMed)

Combe B, Besuyen R, Gomez-Centeno A, Matsubara T, Sancho Jimenez JJ, Yin Z, Buch MH. Geographic Analysis of the Safety and Efficacy of Filgotinib in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Rheumatol Ther. 2023 Feb;10(1):35-51. doi: 10.1007/s40744-022-00494-1. Epub 2022 Oct 7.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36205910 (View on PubMed)

Bingham CO 3rd, Walker D, Nash P, Lee SJ, Ye L, Hu H, Khalid JM, Combe B. The impact of filgotinib on patient-reported outcomes and health-related quality of life for patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: a post hoc analysis of Phase 3 studies. Arthritis Res Ther. 2022 Jan 3;24(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13075-021-02677-7.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34980223 (View on PubMed)

Combe B, Kivitz A, Tanaka Y, van der Heijde D, Simon JA, Baraf HSB, Kumar U, Matzkies F, Bartok B, Ye L, Guo Y, Tasset C, Sundy JS, Jahreis A, Genovese MC, Mozaffarian N, Landewe RBM, Bae SC, Keystone EC, Nash P. Filgotinib versus placebo or adalimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to methotrexate: a phase III randomised clinical trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021 Jul;80(7):848-858. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-219214. Epub 2021 Jan 27.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33504485 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2016-000568-41

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

GS-US-417-0301

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.