Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in Patients With Pacemakers and Implanted Cardioverter Defibrillators
NCT ID: NCT02888353
Last Updated: 2025-12-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
NA
4500 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-12-31
2027-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Investigators hypothesize that in view of the existing objective scientific data, evolution of device technology and the fact that the investigators have scanned more than 2,000 devices safely (RPN03-08-11-12 and 00051707) ICD's and pacemakers and device circumstances previously excluded from MRI protocols can be safely scanned without prior vetting.
This is a prospective, non randomized, cohort study. Seventeen Hundred participants with an implanted ICD or pacemaker and a clinical need for MRI will be included in the study. Unlike previous studies where strict vetting procedures were implemented pre-procedure, All patients with a pacemaker or ICD and clinical need for an MRI will be eligible for inclusion in the study provided participants meet standard MRI inclusion/exclusion safety criteria.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Safety and Clinical Outcomes of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Cardiac Implantable Electrical Devices
NCT03016429
Safety of Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Patients Who Have Mixed Lead Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices
NCT07155135
Study Evaluating the Use of MRI on CMS Patients
NCT02513056
University Hospital Cardiac Device MR Registry: The Safety of MR Imaging in Patients With Implanted Cardiac Devices
NCT02548819
Safety of Cardiac Pacemakers in 1.5T Tesla MRI
NCT00336011
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
When pilot studies were developed, there was a theoretical concern that there may be an increased risk associated with some device and device circumstances including: 1) PPM's or leads implanted prior to 1996; 2) ICD's implanted prior to 2000; 3) abandoned or endocardial leads; 4) leads implanted \<6 weeks; 5) ICD's where patient is pacemaker dependent.
While it was reasonable to be hyper vigilant when initiating pilot studies by including restrictive inclusion criteria, the natural evolution of the devices and device related technologies coupled with a lack of objective scientific data to support investigator's early safety concerns has caused investigators to reevaluate their necessity. For example, older pacemakers and ICD's that previously excluded potential participants are now obsolete; all have expired batteries and have been explanted. Similarly, the technological evolution of ICD's includes ICD's that are now capable of providing ongoing asynchronous pacing including in the MRI environment. Despite some concern that abandoned, epicardial and newly implanted leads may be at increased risk of heating or subject to torque, when investigators evaluated 15 participants with these lead issues and exposed them to MRI (off protocol in life threatening situations) there were no adverse problems seen.
The vetting procedures investigators implemented in pilot studies required that a registered nurse obtain all patient device information and chest xrays (when indicated) from referring physicians, review them in advance of allowing participants to schedule an MRI, and exclude any patient who did not meet inclusion criteria. Investigators found that these procedures were time consuming and expensive (as they required a part time Registered Nurse (RN) salary). In addition, in some cases, patients who might have derived considerable benefit from an MRI were excluded from obtaining one and the time it took to adhere to the vetting procedures needlessly delayed the MRI in some participants, causing them unnecessary stress and frustration and even adversely affecting their clinical care.
MRI's will be done in participants who require a clinically indicated MRI without implementing the vetting procedures investigators included in pilot studies. Participants with implanted pacemakers and ICD's will only be eligible for MRI at Johns Hopkins Hospital (JHH) if they agree to participate in this study. All studies will be done in the 1.5 Tesla MRI unit. Since the first 100 participants were scanned in investigator's initial protocol 03-08-11-12, MRI scan sequences, field intensity and fields of exposure have been given no special consideration given the presence of the pacemaker or ICD and there have been no adverse or unanticipated problems. For this reason, investigators do not feel it is necessary to impose any special restrictions (related to field intensity or scan sequences/exposure) in this protocol. In the event that any device manufacturer indicates the need for including additional safety precautions investigators will amend the protocol immediately to include them.
Electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring pads will be placed on the patient for the duration of the study. Heart rate, blood pressure, O2 saturation will be monitored non-invasively throughout the study by a registered electrophysiology nurse who is Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS )certified, fully trained in cardiac device management and familiar with the research protocol as well as the implications of scanning patients with cardiac devices. In addition to the electrophysiology nurse, two fully certified MRI technologists familiar with scanning participants with implanted devices will be present in the control room the entire time the participant is scanned. The scanner is located in close proximity to the electrophysiology laboratory where Electrophysiology physicians perform procedures, hence at all times at least one, but typically more than one Electrophysiology physician who knows both the participant and the MRI device procedure will be available. A Zoll external defibrillator with transthoracic pacing capabilities, ACLS drugs and a fully equipped crash cart will be readily available at all times in an area that is adjacent to the MRI control room.
Prior to the MRI, participants will be handed an alarm button and instructed to notify the MRI technologist if for any reason he/she feels it is necessary and particularly in the event that any unusual pains or sensations are experienced. Participants can be seen by the technologist and the nurse who is monitoring the scan through a large window that separates the scanner from the control room. In addition, the MRI technologist frequently initiates conversation between sequences by asking the patient; "how are you".
All devices will undergo a complete interrogation and testing prior to imaging and following imaging. PPMs will be programmed to an asynchronous mode if dependent and to an inhibited mode in patients without pacemaker dependence.
The pacemaker function of ICD's in pacemaker independent patients will be programmed to ventricular inhibited (VVI) mode at 50 bpm. Pacemaker dependent participants with ICD's who were previously excluded from prior studies will no longer be excluded as ICD's are now reliably capable of maintaining adequate pacing when programmed to an asynchronous pacing mode..
After the appropriate MRI protocol for each MRI patient is completed, the device will be re-programmed to its original settings and completely interrogated and retested to detect any changes in device performance.
All MRI's are clinically indicated and therefore standard of care. The participants participation in the study will terminate when they complete a 1-6 week follow-up device evaluation that will also be done as standard of care.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Device: MRI no pre-screen
Clinically Indicated MRI will be done in patients with cardiac devices (pacemakers and defibrillators).
Patients will not be pre-screened prior to hospital visit.
Device: MRI
Perform MRI in patients with cardiac devices
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Device: MRI
Perform MRI in patients with cardiac devices
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
9 Years
100 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Yale University
OTHER
Johns Hopkins University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Henry R Halperin, MD/MA
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Johns Hopkins University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Johns Hopkins Hospital, Zayed 5 MRI
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Nazarian S, Hansford R, Rahsepar AA, Weltin V, McVeigh D, Gucuk Ipek E, Kwan A, Berger RD, Calkins H, Lardo AC, Kraut MA, Kamel IR, Zimmerman SL, Halperin HR. Safety of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Cardiac Devices. N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 28;377(26):2555-2564. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1604267.
Ra J, Oberdier MT, Suzuki M, Vaidya D, Liu Y, Hansford R, McVeigh D, Weltin V, Tao S, Thiemann DR, Nazarian S, Halperin HR. Implantable Defibrillator System Shock Function, Mortality, and Cause of Death After Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Ann Intern Med. 2023 Mar;176(3):289-297. doi: 10.7326/M22-2653. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
PubMed Citation #2
PubMed Citation #1
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRB00068447
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.