Study of the Quality of Post Release on Scanners Operating in Minimally Invasive Arthrodesis

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-02-02

Study Completion Date

2015-02-02

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

For twenty years, as for other surgical disciplines, new minimally invasive techniques have been developed with the main goal the reduction of muscle trauma associated with the surrounding roads "classic" and reduce morbidity linked to this one.

More recently, minimally invasive methods dedicated to spinal surgery were established, for the treatment of herniated discs initially, then for narrow lumbar canals.

The canal release on minimally invasive fusion, using a tubular system for muscle retraction is a new technique that has proven effective: post operative pain reduction of hospital stay and blood loss.

The objective of the study is to investigate the quality of ductal release in these minimally invasive fusions.

Main objective of the study: Evaluation of the quality of the release of post scanners operative minimally invasive arthrodesis

Secondary Objectives: Assessment rates/types of early complications of technical Minimally invasive - early postoperative results (postoperative pain, analgesic consumption, length of hospital stay, blood loss) - in clinical outcomes in the short and medium term decompression after minimally invasive fusion.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Added Value of Reconstructive Lymphatic Surgery to Usual Care in Lymphoedema

NCT05064176

Lymphoedema of Leg Lymphedema Arm Lymphedema

RECRUITING NA

Health-Related Quality of Life in Cases of Cubital Tunnel Syndrome

NCT02995382

Cubital Tunnel Syndrome

WITHDRAWN NA

Analysis of the Ligamentization Process in the Anatomical Ligamentoplasty of the Lateral Ankle Plane to the Hamstrings

NCT04361201

Ligament Plastic Surgery

COMPLETED

Does Wrapping With Bone Marrow Injection Enhance Healing of Meniscal Sutures Into the Avascular Area

NCT03968029

Meniscus Lesion

UNKNOWN NA

Surgical Lavage vs Serial Needle Aspiration for Infected Joints

NCT00313365

Arthritis Septic

WITHDRAWN PHASE3

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

I. Background / Rationale

For twenty years, as for other surgical disciplines, new minimally invasive techniques have been developed with the main goal the reduction of muscle trauma associated with the surrounding roads "classic" and reduce morbidity linked to this one.

More recently, minimally invasive methods dedicated to spinal surgery were established, for the treatment of herniated discs initially, then for narrow lumbar canals.

The canal release on minimally invasive fusion, using a tubular system for muscle retraction is a new technique that has proven effective: post operative pain reduction of hospital stay and blood loss.

The objective of the study is to investigate the quality of ductal release in these minimally invasive fusions.

II. objectives

at. primary objective

Evaluating the quality of discharge on postoperative scanners minimally invasive fusions.

b. secondary objectives

i. Evaluation of the rate and type of early complications in the minimally invasive technique

ii. Evaluation of early postoperative results (postoperative pain, analgesic consumption, length of hospital stay, blood loss)

iii. Evaluation of clinical outcomes in the short and medium term decompression after minimally invasive fusion.

III. Methodology and duration of the research

This is a retrospective single-center consecutive series multi-operator regarding the evaluation of surgical practice cited in goal.

Clinical data were collected prospectively by KEOPS database (SAMIO). All patients included in our study have spinal MRI scanners and pre-operative and post-operative scans.

N = (number of patients and over what period) / Time Study?

The series of patients will be classified into two groups:

* Foraminal stenosis
* Central stenosis

The evaluation of the primary objective criterion is comparing the height of the foramen measured on CT pre- and post-operative between the lower edge of the overlying pedicle and the top edge of the pedicle underlying the sagittal sections.

For central stenosis, Postoperative MRI will be performed and the volume of the dural sac will be compared to preoperative MRI on axial images.