Efficacy of Peroperative Suction Drain Usage in Arthroscopic Knee Surgery

NCT ID: NCT02752581

Last Updated: 2016-04-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

110 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-01-31

Study Completion Date

2013-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The study was designed to investigate efficacy of suction drains in arthroscopic knee surgery, rather than anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. two groups were randomised, and suction drain was applied to one group, and the other group as the control group without a suction drain.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The groups were compared in terms of patellar shock, knee effusion, knee scoring systems, range of motion, loss of labour, hospitalization time. Also different arthroscopic procedures such as meniscectomy, meniscus repair, synovectomy and microfracture were evaluated in terms of need for a suction drain. The controls was at 1st and 15th day, 6th week and 3rd month.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chondropathy Knee Effusion Knee Hemarthrosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Drain Group

Suction drain was applied to these patients after arthroscopic knee surgery.

Group Type OTHER

Suction drain

Intervention Type DEVICE

A suction drain is used to remove excess fluid from tissues after surgery.

Control Group

No suction drain was applied to this group, therefore used as a control group.

Group Type OTHER

No suction drain

Intervention Type DEVICE

A suction drain is used to remove excess fluid from tissues after surgery.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Suction drain

A suction drain is used to remove excess fluid from tissues after surgery.

Intervention Type DEVICE

No suction drain

A suction drain is used to remove excess fluid from tissues after surgery.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Hemovac drain

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with knee derangement and accepted to enroll to the study

Exclusion Criteria

* intraarticular fracture, ACL surgery, arthrotomy, bleeding disorder,
Minimum Eligible Age

16 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mert Özcan

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mert Özcan

Assoc. Prof.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Browett JP, Gibbs AN, Copeland SA, Deliss LJ. The use of suction drainage in the operation of meniscectomy. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1978 Nov;60-B(4):516-9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.60B4.711799.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 711799 (View on PubMed)

Alkan K, Unay K, Berkem L, Guven M, Poyanli O. Suction drainage influence on knee effusion following partial meniscectomy with partial fat pad or synovium resection. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2011;45(4):221-4. doi: 10.3944/AOTT.2011.2545.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21908960 (View on PubMed)

Tatari H, Dervisbey M, Muratli K, Ergor A. Report of experience in 190 patients with the use of closed suction drainage in arthroscopic knee procedures. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2005 Sep;13(6):458-62. doi: 10.1007/s00167-004-0537-1. Epub 2004 Nov 13.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16170580 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

TÜTFEK 2008/201

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Ultrasound Guided Arthrocentesis
NCT00537589 COMPLETED NA
Intra Articular Ankle Fractures
NCT05465382 TERMINATED NA