Oral Omadacycline vs. Oral Linezolid for the Treatment of ABSSSI

NCT ID: NCT02877927

Last Updated: 2018-11-30

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

735 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-08-31

Study Completion Date

2017-06-06

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of omadacycline as compared to linezolid in the treatment of adults with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Bacterial Infections Skin Structures and Soft Tissue Infections

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Omadacycline

Omadacycline tablets

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Omadacycline

Intervention Type DRUG

po tablets

Linezolid

Linezolid tablets

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Linezolid

Intervention Type DRUG

po tablets

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Omadacycline

po tablets

Intervention Type DRUG

Linezolid

po tablets

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Zyvox

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients, ages 18 years or older who have signed the informed consent
* Has a qualifying skin and skin structure infection
* Female patients must not be pregnant at the time of enrollment
* Must agree to a reliable method of birth control during the study and for 30 days following the last dose of study drug

Exclusion Criteria

* Infections where the outcome is strongly influenced by factors other than protocol-defined treatments and procedures, or that require antibacterial treatment for greater than 14 days
* Evidence of significant immunological disease
* Severe renal disease or requirement for dialysis
* Evidence of septic shock
* Has a history of hypersensitivity or allergic reaction to any tetracycline or to linezolid
* Has received an investigational drug within the past 30 days
* Women who are pregnant or nursing
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Paratek Pharmaceuticals Inc

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Amy Manley

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Senior Director, Clinical Operations

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Site 620

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Site 642

Mobile, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Site 616

Anaheim, California, United States

Site Status

Site 601

Anaheim, California, United States

Site Status

Site 636

Bakersfield, California, United States

Site Status

Site 606

Buena Park, California, United States

Site Status

Site 604

Chula Vista, California, United States

Site Status

Site 659

Huntington Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Site 608

La Mesa, California, United States

Site Status

Site 618

Laguna Hills, California, United States

Site Status

Site 612

Long Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Site 648

Modesto, California, United States

Site Status

Site 610

Oceanside, California, United States

Site Status

Site 615

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Site 621

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Site 613

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Site 603

Stockton, California, United States

Site Status

Site 650

Torrance, California, United States

Site Status

Site 646

Ventura, California, United States

Site Status

Site 614

DeLand, Florida, United States

Site Status

Site 655

Fort Myers, Florida, United States

Site Status

Site 656

Homestead, Florida, United States

Site Status

Site 631

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Site 658

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Site 654

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Site 626

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Site 637

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Site 653

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Site 641

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Site 645

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Site 640

Miami Lakes, Florida, United States

Site Status

Site 662

Miami Lakes, Florida, United States

Site Status

Site 609

Saint Cloud, Florida, United States

Site Status

Site 644

Council Bluffs, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Site 657

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Site 617

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Site 602

Butte, Montana, United States

Site Status

Site 623

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Site 630

Somers Point, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Site 647

Jackson Heights, New York, United States

Site Status

Site 632

Mount Airy, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Site 649

Toledo, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Site 607

Rapid City, South Dakota, United States

Site Status

Site 635

Jackson, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Site 628

Smyrna, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Site 633

Baytown, Texas, United States

Site Status

Site 605

Channelview, Texas, United States

Site Status

Site 625

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Site 627

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Site 634

Sugar Land, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Rodriguez GD, Warren N, Yashayev R, Chitra S, Amodio-Groton M, Wright K. Intravenous Versus Oral Omadacycline or Linezolid for Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Infections: A post hoc Analysis of the OASIS Trials. Infect Dis Ther. 2024 Dec;13(12):2637-2648. doi: 10.1007/s40121-024-01057-3. Epub 2024 Oct 26.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39461915 (View on PubMed)

Vacalis S, Brunton S, Gindi J. Omadacycline in Skin Infections and Pneumonia: A Review of the Evidence. J Fam Pract. 2022 Jun;71(5 Suppl):S10-S21. doi: 10.12788/jfp.0424.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35776862 (View on PubMed)

Pai MP, Wilcox MH, Chitra S, McGovern PC. Safety and efficacy of omadacycline by BMI categories and diabetes history in two Phase III randomized studies of patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2021 Apr 13;76(5):1315-1322. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkaa558.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33458763 (View on PubMed)

Cornely OA, File TM Jr, Garrity-Ryan L, Chitra S, Noble R, McGovern PC. Safety and efficacy of omadacycline for treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia and acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections in patients with mild-to-moderate renal impairment. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2021 Feb;57(2):106263. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.106263. Epub 2020 Dec 14.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33326848 (View on PubMed)

O'Riordan W, Cardenas C, Shin E, Sirbu A, Garrity-Ryan L, Das AF, Eckburg PB, Manley A, Steenbergen JN, Tzanis E, McGovern PC, Loh E; OASIS-2 Investigators. Once-daily oral omadacycline versus twice-daily oral linezolid for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (OASIS-2): a phase 3, double-blind, multicentre, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019 Oct;19(10):1080-1090. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30275-0. Epub 2019 Aug 29.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31474458 (View on PubMed)

Abrahamian FM, Sakoulas G, Tzanis E, Manley A, Steenbergen J, Das AF, Eckburg PB, McGovern PC. Omadacycline for Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Aug 1;69(Suppl 1):S23-S32. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz396.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31367742 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PTK0796-ABSI-16301

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.