TR-701 FA vs. Linezolid for the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections.

NCT ID: NCT01170221

Last Updated: 2018-08-29

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

667 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-08-15

Study Completion Date

2011-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a randomized, double-blind, double dummy, multicenter Phase 3 study of oral TR-701 FA 200 mg once daily for 6 days versus oral Zyvox® (linezolid) 600 mg every 12 hours for 10 days for the treatment of ABSSSI in adults.

Approximately 75 to 100 sites globally will participate in this study. Patients with an ABSSSI caused by suspected or documented gram positive pathogen(s) at baseline will be randomized 1:1 to study treatment

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The primary objective is to determine the noninferiority in the early clinical response rate of 6 day oral TR-701 FA compared with that of 10-day oral linezolid treatment at the 48-72 Hour Visit in the ITT analysis set in patients with ABSSSI.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue Bacterial Infections

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

TR-701 FA

TR0-701 FA 200 mg tablets once a day for six days followed by 4 days of placebo

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

TR-701 FA

Intervention Type DRUG

Oral TR-701 FA 200 mg once daily for six days followed by four days of placebo.

Linezolid

Linezolid 600 mg tablets oral twice a day for 10 days

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Linezolid

Intervention Type DRUG

Oral Linezolid 600 mg twice daily for 10 days

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

TR-701 FA

Oral TR-701 FA 200 mg once daily for six days followed by four days of placebo.

Intervention Type DRUG

Linezolid

Oral Linezolid 600 mg twice daily for 10 days

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Tedizolid Phosphate TR-700 active moiety Trade name = Zyvox Generic name = linezolid

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with systemic signs of infection diagnosed with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection (ABSSSI)
* Diagnosed with Cellulitis/ erysipelas, major cutaneous abscess, or wound infections

Exclusion Criteria

* Uncomplicated skin infections
* Severe sepsis or septic shock
* ABSSSI solely due to gram-negative pathogens
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Trius Therapeutics LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc. (Rahway, New Jersey USA)

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Philippe G Prokocimer, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Trius Therapeutics

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Trius investigator site 109

Dothan, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Trius Investigator site 130

Anaheim, California, United States

Site Status

Trius investigator site 118

Anaheim, California, United States

Site Status

Trius investigator site 129

Buena Park, California, United States

Site Status

Trius Investigator Site 103

Chula Vista, California, United States

Site Status

Trius Investigator Site 105

La Mesa, California, United States

Site Status

Trius investigator site 126

Laguna Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Trius investigator site 125

Norwalk, California, United States

Site Status

Trius Investigator Site 104

Oceanside, California, United States

Site Status

Trius investigator site 113

Oxnard, California, United States

Site Status

Trius investigator site 123

Pasadena, California, United States

Site Status

Trius Investigator Site 106

Rolling Hills Estates, California, United States

Site Status

Trius investigator site 111

Torrance, California, United States

Site Status

Trius investigator site 132

Torrance, California, United States

Site Status

Trius investigator site 127

Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States

Site Status

Trius investigator site 135

Hialeah, Florida, United States

Site Status

Trius investigator site 101

Columbus, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Trius Investigator Site 102

Savannah, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Trius Investigator site 116

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Trius Investigator Site 108

Springfield, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Trius investigator site 112

Evansville, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Trius Investigator Site 107

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Trius investigator site 133

Butte, Montana, United States

Site Status

Trius investigator site 128

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Trius investigator site 115

Somers Point, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Trius investigator site 114

Toledo, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Trius investigator site 122

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Trius investigator site 120

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Trius investigator site 131

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Trius Investigator site 121

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Trius investigator site 307

Avellaneda, Pcia Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

Trius investigator site 304

Loma Hermosa, Pcia Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

Trius investigator site 309

Buenos Aires, , Argentina

Site Status

Trius investigator site 310

Buenos Aires, , Argentina

Site Status

Trius Investigator site 301

Córdoba, , Argentina

Site Status

Trius investigator site 305

Córdoba, , Argentina

Site Status

Trius investigator site 300

Córdoba, , Argentina

Site Status

Trius investigator site 308

Paraná, , Argentina

Site Status

Trius investigator site 303

Rosario, , Argentina

Site Status

Trius investigator site 306

Santa Fe, , Argentina

Site Status

Trius investigator site 322

Barro Preto, Belo Horizonte, Brazil

Site Status

Trius investigator site 321

São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Trius investigator site 323

São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Trius investigator site 320

Belo Horizonte, , Brazil

Site Status

Trius investigator site 170

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Site Status

Trius investigator site 172

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Trius investigator site 171

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Trius investigator site 175

Brownsburg, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Trius investigator site 173

Chicoutimi, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Trius investigator site 174

Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Trius investigator site 234

Hradec Králové, , Czechia

Site Status

Trius investigator site 235

Mělník, , Czechia

Site Status

Trius investigator site 233

Ostrava, , Czechia

Site Status

Trius investigator site 236

Pardubice, , Czechia

Site Status

Trius investigator site 231

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Trius investigator site 201

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Trius investigator site 202

Hanau, , Germany

Site Status

Trius investigator site 200

Mannheim, , Germany

Site Status

Trius investigator site 203

Plauen, , Germany

Site Status

Trius investigator site 241

Debrecen, , Hungary

Site Status

Trius investigator site 242

Komló, , Hungary

Site Status

Trius investigator site 240

Szeged, , Hungary

Site Status

Trius investigator site 258

Daugavpils, , Latvia

Site Status

Trius investigator site 256

Liepāja, , Latvia

Site Status

Trius investigator site 257

Rēzekne, , Latvia

Site Status

Trius investigator site 255

Riga, , Latvia

Site Status

Trius investigator site 343

Lima Cercado, Lima region, Peru

Site Status

Trius investigator site 342

Miraflores, Lima region, Peru

Site Status

Trius investigator site 341

San Juan de Miraflores, Lima region, Peru

Site Status

Trius investigator site 340

Arequipa, , Peru

Site Status

Trius investigator site 251

Banská Bystrica, , Slovakia

Site Status

Trius investigator site 250

Martin, , Slovakia

Site Status

Trius investigator site 271

Cherkassy, , Ukraine

Site Status

Trius investigator site 264

Dnipro, , Ukraine

Site Status

Trius investigator site 263

Dnipro, , Ukraine

Site Status

Trius investigator site 269

Ivano-Frankivsk, , Ukraine

Site Status

Trius investigator site 260

Kharkiv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Trius investigator site 261

Kyiv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Trius investigator site 268

Lviv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Trius investigator site 265

Lviv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Trius Investigator site 270

Ternopil, , Ukraine

Site Status

Trius investigator site 266

Uzhhorod, , Ukraine

Site Status

Trius investigator site 262

Zaporizhzhya, , Ukraine

Site Status

Trius investigator site 267

Zhytomyr, , Ukraine

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Argentina Brazil Canada Czechia Germany Hungary Latvia Peru Slovakia Ukraine

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Sandison T, De Anda C, Fang E, Das AF, Prokocimer P. Clinical Response of Tedizolid versus Linezolid in Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections by Severity Measure Using a Pooled Analysis from Two Phase 3 Double-Blind Trials. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017 Apr 24;61(5):e02687-16. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02687-16. Print 2017 May.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28264845 (View on PubMed)

Nathwani D, Corey R, Das AF, Sandison T, De Anda C, Prokocimer P. Early Clinical Response as a Predictor of Late Treatment Success in Patients With Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections: Retrospective Analysis of 2 Randomized Controlled Trials. Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Jan 15;64(2):214-217. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw750. Epub 2016 Dec 21.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28003218 (View on PubMed)

Powers JH 3rd, Das AF, De Anda C, Prokocimer P. Clinician-reported lesion measurements in skin infection trials: Definitions, reliability, and association with patient-reported pain. Contemp Clin Trials. 2016 Sep;50:265-72. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2016.08.010. Epub 2016 Aug 13.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27530088 (View on PubMed)

Shorr AF, Lodise TP, Corey GR, De Anda C, Fang E, Das AF, Prokocimer P. Analysis of the phase 3 ESTABLISH trials of tedizolid versus linezolid in acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015 Feb;59(2):864-71. doi: 10.1128/AAC.03688-14. Epub 2014 Nov 24.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25421472 (View on PubMed)

Lodise TP, Fang E, Minassian SL, Prokocimer PG. Platelet profile in patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections receiving tedizolid or linezolid: findings from the Phase 3 ESTABLISH clinical trials. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014 Dec;58(12):7198-204. doi: 10.1128/AAC.03509-14. Epub 2014 Sep 22.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25246392 (View on PubMed)

Bien P, De Anda C, Prokocimer P. Comparison of digital planimetry and ruler technique to measure ABSSSI lesion sizes in the ESTABLISH-1 study. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2014 Apr;15(2):105-10. doi: 10.1089/sur.2013.070. Epub 2014 Jan 22.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24450727 (View on PubMed)

Prokocimer P, De Anda C, Fang E, Mehra P, Das A. Tedizolid phosphate vs linezolid for treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections: the ESTABLISH-1 randomized trial. JAMA. 2013 Feb 13;309(6):559-69. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.241.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23403680 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

TR701-112

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

1986-009

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Linezolid Dosing Strategies in Drug-Resistant TB
NCT05007821 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE2
Linezolid Plus Standard of Care
NCT06958835 RECRUITING NA