Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE1
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-08-31
2019-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparative Responses to 15 Different Antidepressants in Major Depressive Disorder
NCT05952713
Pre-Treatment Positron Emission Topography Scanning for Increasing Success in Antidepressant Treatment
NCT00456014
Imaging Predictors of Treatment Response in Depression
NCT00367341
Brain Energy Metabolism in Individuals With Major Depressive Disorder Receiving Escitalopram
NCT00183677
Study of Brain Response to Emotional Pictures Using a Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) While on Escitalopram
NCT00707863
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Patients will be recruited through a unique new central referral site for "depression packages" in The Mental Health Services in the Capital Region of Denmark. 100 patients with MDD, 18-65 years of age, with moderate to severe single or recurrent episode of MDD (Hamilton 17 item (HAMD-17) score \> 17) will be recruited through this portal. All diagnoses will be confirmed by a specialist in psychiatry.
Before initiation of pharmacological antidepressant treatment with escitalopram, patients will receive baseline examinations as follows: 1) 5-HT4R imaging with 11C-SB207145 PET-scan, 2) EEG examinations, 3) structural MRI, 4) functional MRI , 5) neuropsychological testing, 6) peripheral markers of immune-active cell responses, oxidative stress, cortisol-levels, RNA, genotypes and epigenetic factors will be measured in urine, saliva and peripheral blood at baseline and across the study period. Repeated measures across the study period include: 7) psychometrics by using self-reported questionnaires covering trait and state, including mental distress related to depression and other psychopathology, 8) neuropsychological examinations as well as 9) clinical follow-up with interview based ratings of mental status.
Patients will be treated with escitalopram at flexible doses of 10-20 mg/day adjusted depending on effects and side effects, and participate in clinical follow-up sessions at week 1, 2, 4 and 8. Patients with no response to escitalopram after 4 weeks will be shifted to a secondary pharmacological treatment (duloxetine). A final visit to determine longer-term clinical outcome will be performed at week 12. Compliance, side-effects to antidepressant treatment, and depressive symptoms will be monitored at each follow-up session.
The Hamilton 6 items (HAMD-6) subscale has recently shown to be more sensitive to antidepressant response (Østergaard et al), and will be used to identify treatment response in patients. Patients with \> 50 % reduction in HAMD-6 after 4 weeks will be defined as early responders, and those with additional \< 5 points on the HAMD-6 scale after 8 weeks will be considered in remission. Patients with \>25% response at week 4 and \< 50% reduction in HAMD-6 after full intervention will be considered non-responders. The assessment program including brain imaging with PET 11C-SB207145 will be conducted before drug intervention is initiated and, depending on treatment outcome, again after 8 weeks of antidepressant treatment in 20 patients in remission (remitters) and 20 non-responding patients (non-responders).
UPDATE: As per April 3, 2017 the rescanned group has been expanded to include various response patterns in order to capture rescan data from patients on a spectrum from poor to excellent treatment response, since out of the first 17 included patients only 1 patient fulfilled the non-responder criterion defined above. Accordingly, the clinical outcome parameter in the context will be changes in HAM-D6 from baseline at week 8.
Healthy controls:
From previous studies conducted at the Neurobiological Research Unit, there is access to brain imaging data and baseline PET-SB207145 brain images among healthy controls as well as an associated biobank with stored blood specimens. During the trial, additional healthy controls will be included and will receive baseline examinations and repeated neuropsychological testing after 12 weeks.
Hypotheses:
1. 5-HT4R binding (as imaged by 11C-SB207145 PET) before treatment will predict antidepressant treatment outcome (remission vs non-response) in depressed patients; higher binding at baseline is hypothesized to be associated with a better treatment outcome. Likewise, secondary, 5-HT4R binding (as imaged by 11C-SB207145 PET) before treatment is expected to be associated with the magnitude of change from baseline in Hamilton score (HAMD-6) at 8 weeks.
2. Remitters will display a greater reduction in 5-HT4R binding (as imaged by 11C-SB207145 PET) after antidepressant treatment relative to non-responders.
3. Patients with MDD will have a higher 5-HT4R binding (as imaged by 11C-SB207145 PET) relative to healthy controls.
4. High amygdala reactivity in an "emotional faces" fMRI paradigm before treatment predicts remission in response to antidepressant treatment.
5. Amygdala response to exposure to negative emotional faces (fear and anger) and cerebral 5-HT4R binding is expected to be associated, both in cross-sectional comparison before treatment and with regard to longitudinal changes (changes from baseline).
6. In resting state fMRI (rsfMRI), we expect that changes from baseline in a functional network centered around dorsomedial prefrontal cortex and other networks centered around anterior cingulate cortex and posterior cingulate cortex (default mode network) respectively will predict treatment outcome.
7. Low activity in a brain network engaged in reward processing (as assessed by fMRI) will predict antidepressant treatment response (i.e. positive association between low activity and remitter- relative to non-responder group) both in cross-sectional comparison before treatment and with regard to longitudinal changes (changes from baseline).
8. We expect reduced evoked gamma-activity measured with EEG and "Event-related-potentials" (ERP) in MDD patients compared to controls.
9. Using EEG/ERP, we expect reduced alpha and theta cordance and higher theta band activity among remitters measured at baseline.
10. Higher levels of systemic inflammation will predict poor cognitive function at baseline, and a poor antidepressant treatment outcome.
11. A blunted cortisol awakening response (CAR) at baseline will predict a positive antidepressant treatment outcome.
12. Restored HPA-axis dynamics (increased CAR compared to baseline) at week 8 will be associated with a positive treatment outcome.
13. There will be a significant association between functional networks found by EEG and fMRI, both at baseline and as contrast between remitters and non-responders after 8 weeks.
14. Hippocampal volume will predict treatment outcome.
15. Patients with a low 5-HT4R binding (as imaged by 11C-SB207145 PET) at baseline before treatment will have a lower libido relative to patients with a high binding.
16. Patients who respond to antidepressant treatment with the most pronounced changes in 5-HT4R binding (as imaged by 11C-SB207145) will experience a larger degree of sexual side-effects; i.e., the magnitude of 5-HT4R binding changes from baseline will be positively associated with the degree of sexual side-effects.
17. Childhood abuse (defined by a composite measure of early life stress questionnaires) and anxious depression (defined as anxiety/somatization factor score in HAMD-17 \> 7) predicts poor antidepressant treatment outcome.
18. We expect urinary markers of oxidatively generated DNA/RNA damage to increase more in responders than in non-responders.
19. With an exploratory approach it will be possible to identify a set of predictors of antidepressant treatment outcome. This explorative analysis includes genetics, epigenetics, peripheral and central neurobiological characteristics, neuropsychology testing outcomes, psychometry including self-reported mental distress, both cross-sectional at baseline and as longitudinal measures.
Ethical Aspects:
The study protocol complies with the Declaration of Helsinki II and approval by all relevant authorities will be obtained before initiation. All human volunteers will receive oral and written information about the given study and provide written informed consent before enrolment. The trial is monitored by a Good Clinical Practise unit for the relevant domains.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Treatment of MDD patients
Treatment of MDD patients with escitalopram
Escitalopram
Patients will be treated with an antidepressant drug (escitalopram) at flexible standard doses for 12 weeks. If no response after 4 weeks; shift to duloxetine arm.
Healthy controls
No treatment.
No interventions assigned to this group
Shift of treatment for MDD patients
Treatment of MDD patients with duloxetine
Duloxetine
Patients who at 4 weeks of escitalopram have not responded will be shifted to duloxetine at flexible standard dosages.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Escitalopram
Patients will be treated with an antidepressant drug (escitalopram) at flexible standard doses for 12 weeks. If no response after 4 weeks; shift to duloxetine arm.
Duloxetine
Patients who at 4 weeks of escitalopram have not responded will be shifted to duloxetine at flexible standard dosages.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age 18-65 years
* No previous antidepressant treatment the last 2 months
* Informed and signed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Duration of current depression more than 2 years
* Current or previous psychiatric severe co-morbidity
* Acute suicidal ideation
* Psychotic
* Previous non-response to Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI)
* Contraindication for SSRI treatment
* More suitable with treatment of alternative anti-depressive drug.
* Severe somatic co-morbidity
* Somatic medicine that can influence the trial
* Contraindications for MR-scanning
* Previous exposure to radioactivity \> 10 milli sievert (mSv) within the last year
* Alcohol or drug abuse
* Previous severe head trauma
* Pregnancy
* Breast-feeding
* Insufficient Danish skills
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Center for Integrated Molecular Brain Imaging, Copenhagen, Denmak
OTHER
Psychiatric Centre Copenhagen
UNKNOWN
Central Visitation, Region Hovedstaden
UNKNOWN
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Gitte Moos Knudsen
Chair, Professor, MD, DMSc
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Gitte M Knudsen, MD,Prof.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Neurobiology Research Unit
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Neurobiology Research Unit, Rigshospitalet
Copenhagen, , Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ostergaard SD, Bech P, Miskowiak KW. Fewer study participants needed to demonstrate superior antidepressant efficacy when using the Hamilton melancholia subscale (HAM-D(6)) as outcome measure. J Affect Disord. 2016 Jan 15;190:842-845. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.10.047. Epub 2014 Nov 7.
Jensen KHR, Aarestrup MR, Larsen SV, Kohler-Forsberg K, Knudsen GM, Jorgensen MB, Frokjaer VG. Psychoneuroendocrine profiles of unmedicated men with major depressive disorder and associations to treatment effects and sexual side-effects. Neurosci Appl. 2024 Feb 23;3:104050. doi: 10.1016/j.nsa.2024.104050. eCollection 2024.
Sankar A, Ozenne B, Dam VH, Svarer C, Jorgensen MB, Miskowiak KW, Frokjaer VG, Knudsen GM, Fisher PM. Association between brain serotonin 4 receptor binding and reactivity to emotional faces in depressed and healthy individuals. Transl Psychiatry. 2023 May 11;13(1):165. doi: 10.1038/s41398-023-02440-3.
Ip CT, Ganz M, Ozenne B, Olbrich S, Beliveau V, Dam VH, Kohler-Forsberg K, Jorgensen MB, Frokjaer VG, Knudsen GM. Association between the loudness dependence of auditory evoked potential, serotonergic neurotransmission and treatment outcome in patients with depression. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2023 May;70:32-44. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2023.02.008. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
Weber S, Frokjaer VG, Armand S, Nielsen JH, Knudsen GM, Joergensen MB, Stenbaek DS, Giraldi A. Sexual function improves as depressive symptoms decrease during treatment with escitalopram: results of a naturalistic study of patients with major depressive disorder. J Sex Med. 2023 Feb 14;20(2):161-169. doi: 10.1093/jsxmed/qdac016.
Dam VH, Stenbaek DS, Kohler-Forsberg K, Cheng Ip, Ozenne B, Sahakian BJ, Knudsen GM, Jorgensen MB, Frokjaer VG. Evaluating cognitive disturbances as treatment target and predictor of antidepressant action in major depressive disorder: A NeuroPharm study. Transl Psychiatry. 2022 Nov 8;12(1):468. doi: 10.1038/s41398-022-02240-1.
Fisher PM, Ozenne B, Ganz M, Frokjaer VG, Dam VN, Penninx BW, Sankar A, Miskowiak K, Jensen PS, Knudsen GM, Jorgensen MB. Emotional faces processing in major depressive disorder and prediction of antidepressant treatment response: A NeuroPharm study. J Psychopharmacol. 2022 May;36(5):626-636. doi: 10.1177/02698811221089035. Epub 2022 May 13.
Ip CT, Olbrich S, Ganz M, Ozenne B, Kohler-Forsberg K, Dam VH, Beniczky S, Jorgensen MB, Frokjaer VG, Sogaard B, Christensen SR, Knudsen GM. Pretreatment qEEG biomarkers for predicting pharmacological treatment outcome in major depressive disorder: Independent validation from the NeuroPharm study. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2021 Aug;49:101-112. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2021.03.024. Epub 2021 Apr 25.
Kohler-Forsberg K, Jorgensen A, Dam VH, Stenbaek DS, Fisher PM, Ip CT, Ganz M, Poulsen HE, Giraldi A, Ozenne B, Jorgensen MB, Knudsen GM, Frokjaer VG. Predicting Treatment Outcome in Major Depressive Disorder Using Serotonin 4 Receptor PET Brain Imaging, Functional MRI, Cognitive-, EEG-Based, and Peripheral Biomarkers: A NeuroPharm Open Label Clinical Trial Protocol. Front Psychiatry. 2020 Jul 23;11:641. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00641. eCollection 2020.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NP1
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.