Integrating Behavioral Health and Primary Care for Comorbid Behavioral and Medical Problems
NCT ID: NCT02868983
Last Updated: 2021-10-05
Study Results
Results pending
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
Recruitment Status
UNKNOWN
Clinical Phase
NA
Total Enrollment
4025 participants
Study Classification
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Start Date
2016-04-30
Study Completion Date
2021-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Behavioral problems are part of many of the chronic diseases that cause the majority of illness, disability and death. Tobacco, diet, physical inactivity, alcohol, drug abuse, failure to take treatment, sleep problems, anxiety, depression, and stress are major issues, especially when chronic medical problems such as heart disease, lung disease, diabetes, or kidney disease are also present. These behavioral problems can often be helped, but the current health care system doesn't do a good job of getting the right care to these patients.
Behavioral health includes mental health care, substance abuse care, health behavior change, and attention to family and other psychological and social factors. Many people with behavioral health needs present to primary care and may be referred to mental health or substance abuse specialists, but this method is often unacceptable to patients. Two newer ways have been proposed for helping these patients. In co-location, a behavioral health clinician (such as a Psychologist or Social Worker) is located in or near the primary practice to increase the chance that the patient will make it to treatment. In Integrated Behavioral Health (IBH), a Behavioral Health Clinician is specially trained to work closely with the medical provider as a full member of the primary treatment team.
The research question is: Does increased integration of evidence-supported behavioral health and primary care services, compared to simple co-location of providers, improve outcomes? The key decision affected by the research is at the practice level: whether and how to use behavioral health services.
The investigators plan to do a randomized, parallel group clustered study of 3,000 subjects in 40 practices with co-located behavioral health services. Practices randomized to the active intervention will convert to IBH using a practice improvement method that has helped in other settings. The investigators will measure the health status of patients in each practice before and after they start using IBH. The investigators will compare the change in those outcomes to health status changes of patients in practices who have not yet started using IBH.
The investigators plan to study adults who have both medical and behavioral problems, and get their care in Family Medicine clinics, General Internal Medicine practices, and Community Health Centers.
Behavioral health includes mental health care, substance abuse care, health behavior change, and attention to family and other psychological and social factors. Many people with behavioral health needs present to primary care and may be referred to mental health or substance abuse specialists, but this method is often unacceptable to patients. Two newer ways have been proposed for helping these patients. In co-location, a behavioral health clinician (such as a Psychologist or Social Worker) is located in or near the primary practice to increase the chance that the patient will make it to treatment. In Integrated Behavioral Health (IBH), a Behavioral Health Clinician is specially trained to work closely with the medical provider as a full member of the primary treatment team.
The research question is: Does increased integration of evidence-supported behavioral health and primary care services, compared to simple co-location of providers, improve outcomes? The key decision affected by the research is at the practice level: whether and how to use behavioral health services.
The investigators plan to do a randomized, parallel group clustered study of 3,000 subjects in 40 practices with co-located behavioral health services. Practices randomized to the active intervention will convert to IBH using a practice improvement method that has helped in other settings. The investigators will measure the health status of patients in each practice before and after they start using IBH. The investigators will compare the change in those outcomes to health status changes of patients in practices who have not yet started using IBH.
The investigators plan to study adults who have both medical and behavioral problems, and get their care in Family Medicine clinics, General Internal Medicine practices, and Community Health Centers.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Integrated Care (IC) Models for Patient-Centered Outcomes
NCT03451630
Diabetes
Asthma
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
+7 more
COMPLETED
NA
A Mobile Personal Health Record for Behavioral Health Homes
NCT01890226
Hypertension
Hyperlipidemia
Diabetes
COMPLETED
NA
Improving Communication About Patient Priorities in Multimorbidity
NCT02100982
Chronic Disease
COMPLETED
NA
Mind-Body Approaches for Medical Conditions
NCT03888261
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Psoriasis
Heart Failure
UNKNOWN
NA
A Behavioral Intervention for Depression and Chronic Pain in Primary Care (Relief-Hybrid)
NCT04290845
Chronic Pain
Depression
WITHDRAWN
NA
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The chronic diseases that drive the majority of mortality, morbidity and cost in America and around the globe are largely behavioral in origin or management. Tobacco, diet, physical inactivity, alcohol, substance abuse, non-adherence to treatment, insomnia, anxiety, depression, and stress are major causes of morbidity, mortality and expense, especially when chronic medical problems such as heart disease, lung disease, diabetes, or arthritis are also present. Behavioral problems can often be effectively managed with improved outcomes for patients, their families and the health care system, but the current health care system is often unable to provide such care.
Behavioral Health includes mental health care, substance abuse care, health behavior change, and attention to family and other psychosocial factors. Many people with behavioral health needs present to primary care and may be referred to mental health or substance abuse specialists, but this method is often unacceptable to patients. Two newer models have been proposed for helping these patients. In co-location, a behavioral health provider is located in or near the primary practice to increase the likelihood of successful referral and treatment initiation. An alternative is Integrated Behavioral Health (IBH) in which a Behavioral Health Clinician is specially trained to work closely with the medical provider as a full member of the primary treatment team. Although it is clear that the status quo of under-diagnosis or inadequate referral and treatment is not acceptable, it is not known which of the alternative models is best.
The research question is: Does increased integration of evidence-supported behavioral health and primary care services, compared to simple co-location of providers, improve patient-centered outcomes in patients with multiple morbidities? The key health decisions affected by the research are those made at the practice level: whether and how best to incorporate behavioral health (BH) services. At the patient level, the decision of whether to seek out or accept offered BH services will be influenced by the manner they are made available.
Aim 1: Determine if increased integration of evidence-supported behavioral health and primary care results in better patient-centered outcomes than simple co-location of behavioral providers without systematic integration.
Aim 2: Determine if structured improvement process techniques are effective in increasing BH integration.
Aim 3: Explore how contextual factors affect the implementation and patient centeredness of integrated BH care.
Aim 4: Assess the costs of implementing integration in this setting.
Aim 5: Covid Enhancement: What is the effect of the pandemic upon the effectiveness of IBH?
This is a prospective, cluster-randomized, mixed methods comparison of co-location of BH services vs. IBH in 3,000 subjects in 40 primary care practices around the US.
Usual care (the control comparator) for practices attempting to deliver BH services is co-location of a BH clinician within or adjacent to the primary care facility, without increased integration. The active comparator (the intervention) is Integrated Behavioral Health to support the delivery of protocol supported, stepped, data-driven, evidence-supported, BH care. In both cases, the expenses (such as salaries for the Behavioral Health Clinicians) will be paid by the practices. The intervention consists of training for practice leaders, Behavioral Health Clinicians, primary care providers, and office staff, a Structured Improvement Process support for practice redesign, and a toolkit of suggested tactics for implementing BH.
The target patient population is adults with multiple comorbid medical and behavioral problems receiving services in the target practice settings: Family Medicine clinics, General Internal Medicine practices, and Community Health Centers. The investigators will enroll 40 practices from around the country to represent a broad spectrum of US primary care sites including those serving racial and ethnic minority groups, low-income groups, women, seniors, residents of rural areas, and patients with special health needs, disabilities, multiple chronic diseases, low health literacy or numeracy and/or limited English proficiency. The intervention will be directed at the practices and its impact measured in a randomly selected sample of 75 patients with behavioral health needs from each practice for a total of 3000 patients followed for 2 years.
The primary outcome is the PROMIS-29, a patient-centered measure of global health and functioning. Secondary analyses will assess other outcomes important to patients as well subgroup analyses to allow exploration of what types of patients and practices benefit most from Integrated Behavioral Health. Aim 2 will study the effect of the intervention on practice structure and processes. Aim 3 will identify barriers and supports for successful integration. Aim 4 will assess costs of implementation.
The analyses for Aims 1 and 2 will use generalized linear mixed models of patient health status to perform intention-to-treat analyses as a function of experimental condition (co-location vs. integration), patient characteristics, and time of measurement, with multiple measures clustered within patients and patients clustered within practices. The parameters of interest are the central tendency (mean), statistical significance (P values) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of the adjusted change in PROMIS-29 domain score since before the intervention. Each of the 8 outcome domains in the PROMIS-29 will be modeled individually as 8 separate hypotheses with adjustment for multiple comparisons. Secondary outcomes (Communication, Empathy, Adherence, etc.) will use similar models. Aim 3 will use mixed methods analysis of surveys, focus groups, key informant interviews and other data sources to explore the relationship between the context of the intervention and the patient-centeredness of the resultant care. Aim 4 will use a survey of practice managers in a subset of practices to collect information on staffing changes,staff time, supplies and capital expenses incurred as part of implementation.
Behavioral Health includes mental health care, substance abuse care, health behavior change, and attention to family and other psychosocial factors. Many people with behavioral health needs present to primary care and may be referred to mental health or substance abuse specialists, but this method is often unacceptable to patients. Two newer models have been proposed for helping these patients. In co-location, a behavioral health provider is located in or near the primary practice to increase the likelihood of successful referral and treatment initiation. An alternative is Integrated Behavioral Health (IBH) in which a Behavioral Health Clinician is specially trained to work closely with the medical provider as a full member of the primary treatment team. Although it is clear that the status quo of under-diagnosis or inadequate referral and treatment is not acceptable, it is not known which of the alternative models is best.
The research question is: Does increased integration of evidence-supported behavioral health and primary care services, compared to simple co-location of providers, improve patient-centered outcomes in patients with multiple morbidities? The key health decisions affected by the research are those made at the practice level: whether and how best to incorporate behavioral health (BH) services. At the patient level, the decision of whether to seek out or accept offered BH services will be influenced by the manner they are made available.
Aim 1: Determine if increased integration of evidence-supported behavioral health and primary care results in better patient-centered outcomes than simple co-location of behavioral providers without systematic integration.
Aim 2: Determine if structured improvement process techniques are effective in increasing BH integration.
Aim 3: Explore how contextual factors affect the implementation and patient centeredness of integrated BH care.
Aim 4: Assess the costs of implementing integration in this setting.
Aim 5: Covid Enhancement: What is the effect of the pandemic upon the effectiveness of IBH?
This is a prospective, cluster-randomized, mixed methods comparison of co-location of BH services vs. IBH in 3,000 subjects in 40 primary care practices around the US.
Usual care (the control comparator) for practices attempting to deliver BH services is co-location of a BH clinician within or adjacent to the primary care facility, without increased integration. The active comparator (the intervention) is Integrated Behavioral Health to support the delivery of protocol supported, stepped, data-driven, evidence-supported, BH care. In both cases, the expenses (such as salaries for the Behavioral Health Clinicians) will be paid by the practices. The intervention consists of training for practice leaders, Behavioral Health Clinicians, primary care providers, and office staff, a Structured Improvement Process support for practice redesign, and a toolkit of suggested tactics for implementing BH.
The target patient population is adults with multiple comorbid medical and behavioral problems receiving services in the target practice settings: Family Medicine clinics, General Internal Medicine practices, and Community Health Centers. The investigators will enroll 40 practices from around the country to represent a broad spectrum of US primary care sites including those serving racial and ethnic minority groups, low-income groups, women, seniors, residents of rural areas, and patients with special health needs, disabilities, multiple chronic diseases, low health literacy or numeracy and/or limited English proficiency. The intervention will be directed at the practices and its impact measured in a randomly selected sample of 75 patients with behavioral health needs from each practice for a total of 3000 patients followed for 2 years.
The primary outcome is the PROMIS-29, a patient-centered measure of global health and functioning. Secondary analyses will assess other outcomes important to patients as well subgroup analyses to allow exploration of what types of patients and practices benefit most from Integrated Behavioral Health. Aim 2 will study the effect of the intervention on practice structure and processes. Aim 3 will identify barriers and supports for successful integration. Aim 4 will assess costs of implementation.
The analyses for Aims 1 and 2 will use generalized linear mixed models of patient health status to perform intention-to-treat analyses as a function of experimental condition (co-location vs. integration), patient characteristics, and time of measurement, with multiple measures clustered within patients and patients clustered within practices. The parameters of interest are the central tendency (mean), statistical significance (P values) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of the adjusted change in PROMIS-29 domain score since before the intervention. Each of the 8 outcome domains in the PROMIS-29 will be modeled individually as 8 separate hypotheses with adjustment for multiple comparisons. Secondary outcomes (Communication, Empathy, Adherence, etc.) will use similar models. Aim 3 will use mixed methods analysis of surveys, focus groups, key informant interviews and other data sources to explore the relationship between the context of the intervention and the patient-centeredness of the resultant care. Aim 4 will use a survey of practice managers in a subset of practices to collect information on staffing changes,staff time, supplies and capital expenses incurred as part of implementation.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Arthritis
Asthma
Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease
Diabetes
Heart Failure
Hypertension
Anxiety
Chronic Pain
Depression
Fibromyalgia
Insomnia
Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Problem Drinking
Substance Use Disorder
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
Allocation Method
RANDOMIZED
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Primary Study Purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Blinding Strategy
SINGLE
Outcome Assessors
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Integration
The intervention consists of training for practice leaders, BHCs, PCPs, and office staff, a Protocolized Redesign Process support for practice redesign, and a toolkit of suggested tactics for implementing Tasks A through D:
A. Identification B. Assessment C. Treatment D. Surveillance
Group Type
EXPERIMENTAL
Integration
Intervention Type
OTHER
The intervention consists of training for practice leaders, BHCs, PCPs, and office staff, a Protocolized Redesign Process support for practice redesign, and a toolkit of suggested tactics for implementing Tasks A through D:
A. Identification B. Assessment C. Treatment D. Surveillance
Co-Location
A Behavioral Health Clinician (BHC) such as a psychologist or counselor is housed in or near the primary care practice.
Group Type
NO_INTERVENTION
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Integration
The intervention consists of training for practice leaders, BHCs, PCPs, and office staff, a Protocolized Redesign Process support for practice redesign, and a toolkit of suggested tactics for implementing Tasks A through D:
A. Identification B. Assessment C. Treatment D. Surveillance
Intervention Type
OTHER
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Over 18 years of age
* At least one target chronic medical condition:
* arthritis
* asthma
* chronic obstructive lung disease
* diabetes
* heart failure
* or hypertension.
* Evidence of a behavioral problem or need:
* Diagnosis of:
* anxiety
* chronic pain including headache
* depression
* fibromyalgia
* insomnia
* irritable bowel syndrome
* problem drinking
* substance use disorder
* OR persistent use of certain medications used for behavioral concerns:
* antidepressants
* anxiolytics
* opioids
* antineuropathy agents
* OR persistent failure to attain physiologic control of a medical problem:
* blood pressure\>165 while on 3 or more medications
* A1C \> 9% for 6 months)
* OR the presence of three or more of the target chronic medical conditions.
* At least one target chronic medical condition:
* arthritis
* asthma
* chronic obstructive lung disease
* diabetes
* heart failure
* or hypertension.
* Evidence of a behavioral problem or need:
* Diagnosis of:
* anxiety
* chronic pain including headache
* depression
* fibromyalgia
* insomnia
* irritable bowel syndrome
* problem drinking
* substance use disorder
* OR persistent use of certain medications used for behavioral concerns:
* antidepressants
* anxiolytics
* opioids
* antineuropathy agents
* OR persistent failure to attain physiologic control of a medical problem:
* blood pressure\>165 while on 3 or more medications
* A1C \> 9% for 6 months)
* OR the presence of three or more of the target chronic medical conditions.
Exclusion Criteria
* Not seeking care at a participating practice
* Inability to consent due to cognitive and/or developmental impairment/delays
* Living in the same household as a previously enrolled study participant
* Inability to consent due to cognitive and/or developmental impairment/delays
* Living in the same household as a previously enrolled study participant
Minimum Eligible Age
18 Years
Eligible Sex
ALL
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Arizona State University
OTHER
Sponsor Role
collaborator
State University of New York at Buffalo
OTHER
Sponsor Role
collaborator
Case Western Reserve University
OTHER
Sponsor Role
collaborator
DARTNet
UNKNOWN
Sponsor Role
collaborator
National Committee for Quality Assurance
OTHER
Sponsor Role
collaborator
University of Massachusetts, Worcester
OTHER
Sponsor Role
collaborator
Patient Centered Outcomes Oriented Research Institute
UNKNOWN
Sponsor Role
collaborator
University of Vermont
OTHER
Sponsor Role
lead
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Benjamin Littenberg
Professor
Responsibility Role
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Benjamin Littenberg, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Vermont
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Vermont
Burlington, Vermont, United States
Site Status
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
United States
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
van Eeghen C, Soucie J, Clifton J, Hitt J, Mollis B, Rose GL, Scholle SH, Stephens KA, Zhou X, Baldwin LM. Implementation outcomes from a randomized, controlled trial of a strategy to improve integration of behavioral health and primary care services. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Nov 8;24(1):1361. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11801-7.
Reference Type
DERIVED
Nagykaldi Z, Littenberg B, Bonnell L, Breshears R, Clifton J, Crocker A, Hitt J, Kessler R, Mollis B, Miyamoto RES, van Eeghen C. Econometric evaluation of implementing a behavioral health integration intervention in primary care settings. Transl Behav Med. 2023 Aug 11;13(8):571-580. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibad013.
Reference Type
DERIVED
Rose GL, Bonnell LN, Clifton J, Natkin LW, Hitt JR, O'Rourke-Lavoie J. Outcomes of Delay of Care After the Onset of COVID-19 for Patients Managing Multiple Chronic Conditions. J Am Board Fam Med. 2022 Dec 23;35(6):1081-1091. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2022.220112R1. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
Reference Type
DERIVED
Bonnell LN, Troy AR, Littenberg B. Exploring non-linear relationships between neighbourhood walkability and health: a cross-sectional study among US primary care patients with chronic conditions. BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 19;12(8):e061086. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061086.
Reference Type
DERIVED
Ma KPK, Mollis BL, Rolfes J, Au M, Crocker A, Scholle SH, Kessler R, Baldwin LM, Stephens KA. Payment strategies for behavioral health integration in hospital-affiliated and non-hospital-affiliated primary care practices. Transl Behav Med. 2022 Aug 17;12(8):878-883. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibac053.
Reference Type
DERIVED
Cross AJ, Thomas D, Liang J, Abramson MJ, George J, Zairina E. Educational interventions for health professionals managing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in primary care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 6;5(5):CD012652. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012652.pub2.
Reference Type
DERIVED
van Eeghen C, Hitt JR, Pomeroy DJ, Reynolds P, Rose GL, O'Rourke Lavoie J. Co-creating the Patient Partner Guide by a Multiple Chronic Conditions Team of Patients, Clinicians, and Researchers: Observational Report. J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Apr;37(Suppl 1):73-79. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07308-0. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
Reference Type
DERIVED
Crocker AM, Kessler R, van Eeghen C, Bonnell LN, Breshears RE, Callas P, Clifton J, Elder W, Fox C, Frisbie S, Hitt J, Jewiss J, Kathol R, Clark/Keefe K, O'Rourke-Lavoie J, Leibowitz GS, Macchi CR, McGovern M, Mollis B, Mullin DJ, Nagykaldi Z, Natkin LW, Pace W, Pinckney RG, Pomeroy D, Pond A, Postupack R, Reynolds P, Rose GL, Scholle SH, Sieber WJ, Stancin T, Stange KC, Stephens KA, Teng K, Waddell EN, Littenberg B. Integrating Behavioral Health and Primary Care (IBH-PC) to improve patient-centered outcomes in adults with multiple chronic medical and behavioral health conditions: study protocol for a pragmatic cluster-randomized control trial. Trials. 2021 Mar 10;22(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05133-8.
Reference Type
DERIVED
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
WLPS-1409-24372
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.
Web Platform to Integrate Behavioral Health
NCT03351374
UNKNOWN
Reducing CVD Risk in Caregivers: A Brief Behavioral Activation Intervention
NCT01802554
COMPLETED
NA
Association Between Cardiovascular Diseases and Mental Illness
NCT06239246
RECRUITING
A Behavioral Intervention for Depression and Chronic Pain in Primary Care
NCT03265210
COMPLETED
NA
Healthy Heart Habits
NCT04158219
COMPLETED
PHASE1/PHASE2
The Health Access and Recovery Peer Program
NCT01725815
COMPLETED
NA
Healthy Mind Healthy You: A Study of Mindfulness
NCT03844321
COMPLETED
NA
Impact of Community-Based Biofeedback Program on Drug Use and Mental Health Among People Experiencing Homelessness
NCT05897580
COMPLETED
NA
Behavioral Health Program for Short-Stay Nursing Facility Residents & Care Partners
NCT07220486
RECRUITING
NA
Structuring the Integration of Care Management Services For Medicaid Enrollees Recipients With Chronic Illness, Substance Abuse Problems and Possible Psychiatric Disorders
NCT00399373
TERMINATED
Improving Well-Being for Older Adult Family Dementia Caregivers
NCT03881631
COMPLETED
NA
Promoting Well-being and Health in Heart Failure
NCT04829617
RECRUITING
NA
Feasibility and Implementation of a Healthy Lifestyles Program
NCT03258138
COMPLETED
NA
Physical Health in Midlife: Influences of Adversity and Relationships Over Time
NCT01853332
COMPLETED
Mindfulness to Improve Elders' Immune and Health Status
NCT01027780
COMPLETED
NA
Chronic Pain Management In Primary Care Using Behavioral Health Consultants
NCT04680000
RECRUITING
NA
Mind-body Interventions in Cardiac Patients
NCT01270568
COMPLETED
NA
A Resilience Building Intervention to Promote Successful Aging
NCT03294655
COMPLETED
NA
Health Coaching for Chronic Multisymptom Illness
NCT04157101
COMPLETED
NA
My Healthy Brain: Preserving and Promoting Brain Health Through Evidence-based Practices
NCT04537728
COMPLETED
NA
Peer Navigators for the Health and Wellness of People With Psychiatric Disabilities
NCT05018351
UNKNOWN
NA
Promoting Mental and Cognitive Health in Old Age Through Scalable Evidence-based Interventions
NCT07072338
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
Cardiac Rehabilitation for Cardiovascular Risk Reduction in People With Severe and Persistent Mental Illness
NCT05659498
UNKNOWN
NA
Evaluation of a Health Promotion Intervention for Persons With Mental Illness
NCT00215189
COMPLETED
Homing in on Health: Study of a Home Delivered Chronic Disease Self Management Program
NCT00263939
COMPLETED
NA